Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 Mar 2004, 16:58 (Ref:920259)   #1
Edmonton
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 422
Edmonton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Flat Engines

What are the advantages/disadvantages of these in racing?
Edmonton is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Mar 2004, 17:14 (Ref:920269)   #2
Richy_Rich
Racer
 
Richy_Rich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
France
France
Posts: 470
Richy_Rich should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Low center of gravity would be the main advantage, I think.
Richy_Rich is offline  
__________________
The wonderful dexterity of Hannu Mikkola, makes me want to shake hands with the whole of Finland.
(Architecture And Morality, Ted And Alice - Half Man Half Biscuit)
Quote
Old 26 Mar 2004, 18:34 (Ref:920345)   #3
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
I think that Subaru struggle for power in their boxer engines.
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 26 Mar 2004, 20:44 (Ref:920522)   #4
KC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 2,762
KC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The only problem I see with a boxer style motor is that it can be hard to package between the suspension components on a road car. Porsche has pretty much solved the horsepower issues with the design over the last 30 years. With most car designs ther eis more room front to back than side to side. Of course, FWD setups favor a shorter engine when mounted inline with the axles.

Biggest advantage would seem to be low center of gravity and low overall height. Easier to package under a low profile shape. This can also be a challenge if the engine is wide enough to be in the way of suspension mounts.
KC is offline  
__________________
Never forget #99
Quote
Old 26 Mar 2004, 23:29 (Ref:920692)   #5
chunder
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
England
Stevenage
Posts: 8,298
chunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridchunder should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
A few manufacturers still use them.
Alfa used them for a while with some success, but like an earlier thread said, they struggle foir outright power I think.
Subaru also make a flat 6 I reckon.
And Porsche have so much experience that they have got all the problems licked, using different types of cooling and turbos for the power.
chunder is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Mar 2004, 23:10 (Ref:922369)   #6
cannardd
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
London, England
Posts: 111
cannardd should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The main reason for Porsche switching to water cooling is emissions, for which you want a constant(ish) controllable engine temp and it is very difficult to do that with air cooling.

It also has an added benefit of being quieter, which helps them in the EU drive-by noise tests.

A flat-4 is an ideal setup for a front engine 4WD car though.
cannardd is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 02:14 (Ref:922448)   #7
GTV27
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location:
Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 706
GTV27 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Why are there any power issues associated with a flat engine (I've not previously heard of it as an issue)?

As an admirer of the Alfa and Subaru boxer engines (not to mention Porsche and Ferrari), I'd appreciate if this could be elaborated on.
GTV27 is offline  
__________________
"If a man could be crossed with a cat, it would improve the man but deteriorate the cat."
Mark Twain
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 15:55 (Ref:922985)   #8
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
the inlet/exhaust tract is a bit tricky to do due to the length and complexity I would guess. That would probably affect torque and power is a function of torque (or is it the other way round :confused: )

Dont they also have to use a lot of balancing weights in a flat 4 which would affect throttle response I guess...
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 16:21 (Ref:923014)   #9
avsfan733
Veteran
 
avsfan733's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Rochester
Posts: 1,618
avsfan733 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ya thats definitely a problem. Especially once you go the turbochargin route. you have to run one set of primaries all the way accross the engine then run the intake back.
I thought that part of the reason for flat engines was there inherent balance though?
avsfan733 is offline  
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 17:05 (Ref:923059)   #10
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
porsche used balancing shafts in their engines didnt they.

engines really arent my thing. enjoy them but havent really studied them too much () so am groping in the dark.
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 18:21 (Ref:923158)   #11
KC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 2,762
KC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I think they only used balancing shafts in the 968 massive four cylinder engine. I don't think the flat 6's needed any additional balancing other than a harmonic balancer on the crankshaft.
KC is offline  
__________________
Never forget #99
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 19:57 (Ref:923259)   #12
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
ah that would make sense.
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 20:41 (Ref:923304)   #13
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
a flat 4 is far better balenced than an inline 4 due to the fact that the pistons and rods always have an opposite number travelling in the exact opposite direction.
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 29 Mar 2004, 21:26 (Ref:923362)   #14
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Exhaust problems are not impossible to solve.... just difficult at times - my Alfasud has 4->1 exhaust.... just don't look too closely at the ground clearance (or lack). Of course with a turbo it's extra difficult and may result in some undesirable compromises being made.

However, when compared to an inline four, a four cylinder boxer has another advantage - the very short crankshaft has 3 main bearings, instead of 5 in an inline 4. So less friction and the potential for more power rather than less.
alfasud is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Mar 2004, 08:06 (Ref:923659)   #15
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Surely the surface area of the bearings will be similar though as it still has to withstand similar peak same gas forces acting upon it?
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 30 Mar 2004, 17:20 (Ref:924235)   #16
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i'm not so sure on that one, in a normal inline engine all the load is taken by the lower bearings because the crank is being pushed down onto them, but in a flat engine, both sides of the bearings take the load, so you dont actually need as bigger a bearing, as its the area that takes the load thats important not the actual bearing size.
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 30 Mar 2004, 19:13 (Ref:924368)   #17
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
The engine must still fire one cylinder at a time so the crank is still effectively going to be pushed away from the burn.

I am probably missing something but cant see how the crank can exert a force on the bearing on the 180 degrees facing up the bore :confused:
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 31 Mar 2004, 09:54 (Ref:924989)   #18
StephenRae
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Wales
North West
Posts: 871
StephenRae should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
A 4 cyl. boxer engine is essentially two x two cylinder blocks bolted together. Surely this must be inherantly stronger than having big end caps?
StephenRae is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Mar 2004, 10:51 (Ref:925044)   #19
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
the big end caps only take the load when at TDC on the exhaust stroke.

unless the crank journal is pushed through the rods big end there will still be big end bolts allowing the con rod to be removed from the engine...
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 31 Mar 2004, 19:13 (Ref:925557)   #20
graham bahr
Veteran
 
graham bahr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
England
cambs
Posts: 2,071
graham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridgraham bahr should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
yes the crank is pushed away from the burn, but the burn is in two opposing directions, so the load is spread.

the flat 4 alfa engine has conventional rods and bigends, its the main caps that are different, the two cylinder blocks are joined on there bottom sides by the lower half of the main bearing which is turned through 90 degrees compaired to a normal main, and the cap is fitted through a hole in the top of the crankcase, and is tied unto the rest of the engine by the head bolts in a similar manor to the rover k series engine.

Last edited by graham bahr; 31 Mar 2004 at 19:14.
graham bahr is offline  
__________________
AKA Guru

its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it!
Quote
Old 6 Apr 2004, 12:58 (Ref:932234)   #21
BugEyed
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location:
Malvern Hills
Posts: 233
BugEyed should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Packaging

Flat engines fell out of fashion in racing when under-car aerodynamics were used to provide downforce in the '80's. In F1 at that time Ferarri were running their Flat 12, but they were unable to successfully exploit the downforce available because of the width of the engine, whereas the relatively narrow DFV allowed the use of full length venturis. They subsequently went to a 90 degree V6 for their F1 turbo before going 72 degree V10 for their normally aspirated engines. Modern race engines now tend to run very narrow V angles to make the engine as narrow as possible (despite the inherent imbalance involved) to allow the best possible aerodynamics.

Duncan

Last edited by BugEyed; 6 Apr 2004 at 13:06.
BugEyed is offline  
__________________
No longer enjoying the majority of the VSCC's events.
Quote
Old 6 Apr 2004, 16:34 (Ref:932470)   #22
imull
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location:
Isle of Mull.
Posts: 601
imull has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
I must be missing something Graham but I still cant figure out how you get this "burn in two opposing directions" bit.

Surely there is only one cylinder firing at once...?
imull is offline  
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by...
Quote
Old 11 Apr 2004, 10:09 (Ref:936356)   #23
noodles
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 36
noodles should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Bugeyed, interestingly, the initial turbo V6 ferari engines were 120 degrees ,as in the 126 series of cars (i.e Pironi & Villeneuve etc. cars) before moving to a 90 degrees for the 1987 season.
noodles is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Apr 2004, 06:58 (Ref:936994)   #24
alfasud
Veteran
 
alfasud's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
New Zealand
Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 972
alfasud should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm not sure I'd like to claim any expertise in engine design theory, but in practice, the three main bearing boxer-4 engines do tend to have less overall bearing area than a 5-main bearing inline-4 cylinder engine. Reduced crankshaft flex probably helps.

Interestingly, I remember reading about the Ferrari flat-12. For sports prototype racing, these had 7 main bearings, but when they began developing the engine for 3.0L F1 engines, they used 4 main bearings, for reduced friction.

http://www.ddavid.com/formula1/fer312b.htm
alfasud is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Apr 2004, 09:09 (Ref:942392)   #25
eclectic
Racer
 
eclectic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Scotland
Glasgow, Scotland.
Posts: 491
eclectic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Boxer engines? Lovely things I have one in my Citroen 2CV 1964, 425cc! Last week it seemed to be even slower than usual, traced to a loose spark plug, amazingly it was still able to take two adults up the hill out of my village, albeit at snail's pace in 1st!
eclectic is offline  
__________________
"Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting"

Steve McQueen.
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flat out at 50 grichie87 National & Club Racing 45 3 Aug 2005 19:19
Flat spot Marbot Formula One 25 14 Jan 2005 12:18
[Books] Perry McCarthy- Flat Out Flat Broke Utopian Armchair Enthusiast 22 27 Dec 2004 18:32
Flat Engines Edmonton Formula One 20 16 Dec 2003 20:48
Flat out - Flat broke! Super Tourer Formula One 21 23 Jul 2002 11:59


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.