|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Apr 2007, 08:48 (Ref:1891609) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,623
|
Soft tyres, hard tyres
Watching and lsitening to qualies yesterday, I noted the comments on the usage of soft and hard tyres
As it stands, no one appears to relish using the hard ones and is doing everything to limit the amount of time and laps spent on them. Stategies are being planned around damage limitation on the time lost while using them. It's like a certain shirt in my wardrobe - I only wear it when the rest are in the wash and there ain't any other options. I'm not keen on it but it gets a public airing only when circumstances demand. My take is that the soft and hard compound during the race is a silly old sausage. Let's give them the option to use the fastest compound possible for a given track and conditions. And, while we're at it - why not slicks (flame bait!) Any thoughts? |
||
|
15 Apr 2007, 09:09 (Ref:1891628) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,246
|
I think theres the strong possibility that Bridgestones desire to remain "talked about" through the use of 2 compounds used in the race could end up turn negatively, as it seems the 2 selected compounds are never going to be close on any given circuit. Theres always going to be one thats completely unsuited to track conditions, which is sure to draw plenty of criticism through its use.
|
||
|
15 Apr 2007, 09:42 (Ref:1891647) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
The current regulations are a logical consequence of the control tyre. Bridgestone wants us to keep spending attention to their products.
|
||
|
15 Apr 2007, 11:49 (Ref:1891770) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Just c and p'ing some of the rules
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Apr 2007, 15:25 (Ref:1892004) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
The desire to keep TV schedules running smoothly ensures that this is unlikely. A decapitated head on the start-finish straight would probably mean Safety Car now.
If teams only had to use one type of tyre, far more tyres would be wasted, so there are economic reasons for the soft/hard balance. The rules need tweaking though - Liuzzi switching to softs in the Safety Car period meant that he had no 'disadvantage' from the 'inferior' hards. |
||
|
15 Apr 2007, 15:29 (Ref:1892009) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
I think it would have been a better idea to have only compound per weekend.
|
||
|
15 Apr 2007, 15:32 (Ref:1892018) | #7 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,181
|
I think its intriguing to be able to see how the cars perform on two different compounds. I am sure it means compromises in design and setup as well. Doesn't bother me at all.
|
||
__________________
"And the most important thing is that we, the Vettels, the Bernies, whoever, should not destroy our own sport by making stupid comments about the ******* noise." - Niki Lauda |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Indy Circuit is so hard on tyres? | Greenback | Formula One | 7 | 8 Jul 2006 13:37 |
2005 tyres - hard as nails | sonic | Formula One | 29 | 20 Oct 2004 08:37 |
Tyres: hard or soft? | Adam43 | Formula One | 2 | 9 Jun 2002 14:31 |
Bridgestone Motorsport Extra Soft tyres... | Sparky | Formula One | 5 | 21 May 2000 15:45 |