|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 Aug 2003, 17:12 (Ref:689854) | #1 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Move over Max, I can do better
Well, I cant really, but there are a few changes I would like to make.
Although initially in favour of the new qualifying format, I'd like to make some adjustments. I would like to ban refuelling totally, but if I cant have that, the following will be fine. Friday 08:30 - 12:30 : Free Testing # 13:30-14:30 : Practice 1 15:30 - 16:30 : Superpole * Saturday 09:45 - 10:30 Practice 2 12:00 - 13:00 Practice 3 15:30 - 16:00 Top 6 shootout @ Sunday 09:00 - 09:45 Warm up 02:00 Grand Prix # : Teams that take this up limited to 15 testing sessions during season * : As it is now, low fuel - flat out - ths will decide who gets into top 6 and the gris from 4th row back @ : Top 6 do it all again, one last crack at pole Personally, I like one lap qualifying, it adds another skill the drivers must master, and any X factor (that is'nt manuipluated) only makes the racing more interesting. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
16 Aug 2003, 17:22 (Ref:689859) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
That does make sense.
I like it actually! |
|
|
17 Aug 2003, 00:05 (Ref:690026) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
Jeez ANYBODY could do better than the idiots who 'run' f1 now
....sorry not implying that you are little better |
||
|
17 Aug 2003, 00:59 (Ref:690053) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 6,038
|
There's many different groups to please...
I think the current format is great for TV, but **** for those attending the race... a tumbleweed could roll through the track on Sunday morning at events without propers support races. |
||
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes |
17 Aug 2003, 01:45 (Ref:690063) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,071
|
This is my ideal format:
Friday 8:00 - 11:00 Open Testing 1 * 12:30 - 1:30 Practice 1 2:00 - 3:00 Qualifying 1 ** 3:30 - 4:30 F3000 Qualifying 1 Saturday 8:00 - 9:00 Open Testing 2 11:00 - 12:00 Practice 2 12:30 - 1:30 F3000 Shootout 2:00 - 3:00 Shootout Sunday 8:00 - 9:00 Open Testing 3 9:30 - 10:00 F3000 Warm Up 11:00 - 12:00 Warm-Up / Practice 3 12:15 - 12:30 F3000 Warmup 12:45 F3000 Race 2:00 - Grand Prix * Limited to 8 testing days per year ** Normal 12 lap maximum qualifying |
||
__________________
Don't let manufacturers ruin F1. RIP Tyrrell, Arrows, Prost, Minardi, Jordan. |
17 Aug 2003, 05:30 (Ref:690111) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
I have a different idea for qualifying. I think that on friday, it should be the same as it is now, except each person gets 2 flying laps and if you don't like them, you have the option for going out again at the end of the session for one flying lap, however if that lap is slower, too bad. Saturday however is what I would really change. As each running spot comes up, The person who has the fastest rtime from friday has the opportunity to take it, they can either take it or pass, then the second place driver has the option to run or pass,then so on down the list.
Basically make qualifying on friday worht something more than simply being stuck going last in case of rain. I should also mention that you cannot touch the car after the commencment of saturday qualifying, no changes to tire pressures wings or fuel strategy, you can pull the car to the grid and then start it at the appropriate time thats it, changes lose you a lap, not a start from pitlane. |
||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
17 Aug 2003, 12:53 (Ref:690305) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 778
|
The more I think about Wrex's scheme, the better I like it. The Top 6 Shootout is really appealing. I suggest running it on a three laps combined basis like the Indianapolis qualifying. Adds to the suspense. It is also a pretty neat solution to the testing problem.
|
||
|
17 Aug 2003, 21:35 (Ref:690559) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,707
|
good idea, especially about the top 6 shoot-out.
would give the specators another chance to see the top drivers who pull in most of the cash. |
||
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now" Douglas Adams. 1952-2001 |
17 Aug 2003, 21:36 (Ref:690562) | #9 | |
Retired
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 632
|
The problem is Wrex that I have already earmarked myself to be the head of the FIA. Therefore, all your suggestions will have to go via ME.
I like them! You have my permission to instigate them starting next season. |
|
|
17 Aug 2003, 21:50 (Ref:690582) | #10 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Wow! What a conincedence Suzy, I have myself earmarked for Bernies's job. I have no doubt we will work well together. A Michael and Mika fan, who'd have thought?
|
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
17 Aug 2003, 21:58 (Ref:690588) | #11 | |
Retired
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 632
|
Only if I can have Bernie's salary to go with Max's job!
Anyway, I like both Mika and Michael (but I like Mika best of all). |
|
|
17 Aug 2003, 22:22 (Ref:690607) | #12 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
No way, thats why I want Bernies Job.
As for Mika/Michael, same in reverse. Truth is, these decisions have factors we never consider (or in some cases) or care about, ie costs. While I'm a traditionalist at heart, today we need some changes that maintain manufacturer interest (technolgy), entertainment (increased X-factors) and reduce expenditure. So rewarding the limited testing further is a good thing, and having qualifying after only 1 hour at the track will reward the teams and drivers that can 'dial it in' quicker than others. The top 6 shoot-out is just for entertainment, but will give a driver that lost a couple of tenths in Superpole another chance, without the risk of falling off the front 3 rows. Without race fuel, it really will be a straight battle as well. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
18 Aug 2003, 00:54 (Ref:690689) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 996
|
The only problem I see with the "top six shooutout" idea is how the parc ferme would factor in. The drivers who didn't get in would lose the extra chance at tweeking their setup in the final qualifying, further increasing the disparity on race day. On the other hand, they would be able to setup their car however they wanted for race day without worrying about how the final qualifying would affect their fuel situation.
|
||
|
18 Aug 2003, 01:45 (Ref:690705) | #14 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Omega99, this would'nt be a problem, as there are no Parc Ferme rules. Qualifying and race would be seperate again
|
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
18 Aug 2003, 02:13 (Ref:690715) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
Friday
8am - 12pm - F1 Official Testing (Factored in is the limit of 15 days testing for all teams) 1pm - 2pm - F1 Practice 1 2:30pm - 3:30pm - F1 Qualifying 1 (6 laps) 3:45 - 5pm - F3000 Practice 1 Saturday 9am - 10am - Practice 2 10am - 11am - F3000 Practice 2 Midday - 1pm - F3000 Qualifying 1:30pm - 2:30pm - F1 Qualifying 2 (6 laps) 3pm - 3:30pm - Superpole (Top 10) Sunday 9am - 9:30am - F3000 Warm-up 10am - 10:30pm - F1 Warm-up 12pm - F3000 Race 2pm - F1 Race |
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sensible move from GP2 | Kicking-back | National & International Single Seaters | 31 | 12 Sep 2005 16:38 |
[FIA GT] GNM move to FIA too | pink69 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 6 Sep 2002 17:43 |
To move or not to move... | Ralf's Girl | Formula One | 2 | 31 Jul 2000 22:17 |