|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
1 Apr 2008, 18:07 (Ref:2167182) | #1 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,894
|
[WTCC] Race 3 & 4 - Puebla (MEX), 5/6 April 2008
Quote:
|
||
|
1 Apr 2008, 20:14 (Ref:2167293) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,857
|
The question is will the track stay together this time?
Would expect the diesel Leons to be quick due to the twisty nature of the track. What does everyone else think? |
||
|
1 Apr 2008, 20:32 (Ref:2167307) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,706
|
Chevy think they will be able to get onto the podium. But a few weeks ago, they were afraid of being blown away by the turbodiesels, due to the high altitude of Puebla. They announced that they would speak with the FIA about the turbo-pressure of the SEAT's. Apparently they have had succes, and the Seat's are slowed down? Or is it just PR-talk?
|
||
|
1 Apr 2008, 21:07 (Ref:2167350) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
The skimmed milk air will cause SEAT to utterly dominate. I think they will absolutely axe murder the BMWs and Chevys, no doubt.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
1 Apr 2008, 22:15 (Ref:2167403) | #5 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
wazz'up??? |
1 Apr 2008, 22:16 (Ref:2167405) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
|
||
|
2 Apr 2008, 08:44 (Ref:2167605) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,153
|
I hope they actually managed to put tarmac on the track that sticks together this time...
|
||
|
2 Apr 2008, 16:55 (Ref:2168005) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Puebla is probably the worst track that the WTCC visits, in every aspect. That said, I hope that Chevrolet can at least put out a moderate result. Why doesn't WTCC race at Mexico City?
|
||
|
2 Apr 2008, 17:47 (Ref:2168039) | #9 | ||||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
Quote:
well...if you consider that the promoter of the race owns the track, is a FIA delegate in the World Motorsports Council for Latin-American region...apart of the fact that like i said VW HQ's are located just 50 KM down the highway in Mexico city direction... CIE/OCESA doesn't rent the Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez cheap either... Last edited by Net-Ranger; 2 Apr 2008 at 17:52. |
||||
__________________
wazz'up??? |
2 Apr 2008, 18:05 (Ref:2168046) | #10 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,894
|
If they have solved the tarmac problems it's a great track
|
|
|
2 Apr 2008, 21:51 (Ref:2168193) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,484
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
3 Apr 2008, 00:17 (Ref:2168261) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
I couldn't save in time to go down to Mexico for the race, oh well.
Turbo-Diesel cars are effected by high altitude, just not as badly as N/A engines and that makes sense. Why should the FIA step in when SEAT has chosen to run the TDI car at additional cost to them, when FIA created the rules to allow for Turbo-Diesel car to enter? I don't know what people thought that TD's wouldn't be competitive in small car racing around 300hp, which BMW has won in VNL competition with a 120d and VW has won the Spa 24 in class with its Golf TDI before. Does that mean N/A engines can't be competitive? Sure but you're going to throw some money at it and BMW, Honda and GM all have direct injection production cars, more compression on the same fuel will allow more power, but you'll have a hard time matching the torque of a TD and there isn't much you can do about it but add weight. When the WTCC comes back to Europe the playing field will be leveled a bit, I wouldn't make an adjustment. |
||
|
3 Apr 2008, 13:20 (Ref:2168655) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,706
|
Compression rate is limited by the S2000-rules. Although i'm no engineer whatsoever, that's probably the main reason together with the maximum of 2000cc and probably a restricted air-intake, that all the different engines produce about the same power; 270-285 hp in normal conditions. The dieselrules must make sure imo that those engines must performe in the same way, when engineered well. Maybe even a little bit less power, becouse it will be compensated by a higher torque. That means also a limited air-intake, compression-rate and cilindersize, and off-course a limited turbo-pressure. I think it is hard to believe that there is nobody at the FIA who could have calculated the turbo-pressure that is able to get comparable engineperformances out of a well engineered dieselengine, as a well engineered petrolengine would deliver.
But what do we see? Dieselrules without maximum turbo-pressures, the FIA who takes samples of the pressures and forbids SEAT to raise them in the Brazilean race, but then again says nothing about the next races. It is all very confusing. Having said that: when the rules are good in that the dieselengines on average match the petrolengines, the high altitude-races should be the terrain of the diesels, so SEAT dominance in Puebla is no evidence that the rules are bad and policy instead of engineering and drivingtalent is the way to win races. But we don't need evidence, since we have enough... |
||
|
3 Apr 2008, 14:44 (Ref:2168720) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
As I understood it they will adjust the allowed Turbo pressure at each race depending on relative performance. Pretty messy solution though.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2008, 22:33 (Ref:2169088) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
Somewhere, somebody will cry it doesn't matter. If the SEAT's are down on power in N/A mode, allowing less weight would be one way to help them. FIA helped RML by allowing higher than allowed compression ratios during the 2007 season. They are back to legalized limits this season. When SEAT starts winning with lightweight cars, BMW and GM will cry foul. You can't make everybody happy but as Dan Gurney said, when everybody is mad at you then your doing something right.... |
|||
|
4 Apr 2008, 22:16 (Ref:2169895) | #16 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 391
|
||
|
5 Apr 2008, 02:15 (Ref:2169984) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Most importantly, Chevrolet is the fastest of the petrol cars. That makes me all happy inside!
|
||
|
5 Apr 2008, 02:36 (Ref:2169991) | #18 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 39
|
hello everyone. i'm new here.
As my english is limit, plz help me in the future =] and i'm a die-hard bmw fan ! i have a question, are the BMWs going to use the diesel power engine in Mexico? thz =] |
|
|
5 Apr 2008, 08:48 (Ref:2170096) | #19 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 391
|
Hey Smokinjo (fan of Joachim Winkelhock? ). Welcome to the forum.
No, the BMW's aren't going to use the diesel cars in Mexico yet. It's still unknown if they are going to use it in Valencia for the third race of the season. |
|
|
5 Apr 2008, 09:33 (Ref:2170113) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Welcome to ten tenths, smokinjo.
It would probably make more sense for BMW to introduce the 320d at Brno. Similar to in F1 where engines have to last two weekends, in the WTCC engines have last four. I don't think they would gain anything by introducing it at Valencia or Pau and taking the grid drop unless the engine really is something spectacular, which is unlikely. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
5 Apr 2008, 10:07 (Ref:2170135) | #21 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 391
|
Good point
|
|
|
5 Apr 2008, 10:27 (Ref:2170144) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,153
|
Mario Theissen is strongly against Diesel engines. So as long as BMW can keep up with Seat with Petrol engines I strongly doubt we'll see the BMW's running on diesel.
|
||
|
5 Apr 2008, 10:35 (Ref:2170146) | #23 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 391
|
As long as yes. But BMW made it also very clear that if they can't they will come with a diesel engine. And they already have developed one and they think it will be much stronger than the SEAT diesel.
Let's just hope the diesels will be banned. |
|
|
5 Apr 2008, 10:44 (Ref:2170154) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,153
|
I'm not hoping that as they're just as much part of racing as petrols these days.
|
||
|
5 Apr 2008, 14:10 (Ref:2170344) | #25 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 450
|
Same here...they are just too quiet for racing purposes.
|
||
|
Tags |
wtcc |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WTCC] Race 1 & 2 - Curitiba (BRA), 1/2 March 2008 | FIRE | Touring Car Racing | 151 | 10 Mar 2008 22:21 |
WRC 2008 MEX Rally Mexico | flying finn | Rallying & Rallycross | 26 | 4 Mar 2008 12:08 |
[WTCC] Race 11 & 12 - Puebla (MEX), 29/30 July 2006 | FIRE | Touring Car Racing | 154 | 31 Jul 2006 22:31 |
[WTCC] Race 3 & 4 - Magny Cours (FRA), 29/30 April 2006 | FIRE | Touring Car Racing | 65 | 13 May 2006 17:23 |
[WTCC] Race 1 & 2 - Monza (ITA), 1/2 April 2006 | FIRE | Touring Car Racing | 101 | 4 Apr 2006 14:14 |