|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Mar 2003, 22:45 (Ref:530710) | #1 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,776
|
Lack of Mechanical Failures
Most of the incidents in the race were 'offs' but not that many mechanical failures.
Normally at the start of the season there are a few of these. Especially engines. For example, no machines actually went bang. I was very surprised. Of course there were a couple of mechanical failures, but what are people's thoughts on this? Have the engine manufacturers got themselves sorted out? |
||
__________________
Successfully crashing a probe into the moon is like saying you successfully swam the English Channel by having your corpse wash up on the beach. |
9 Mar 2003, 23:32 (Ref:530767) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 164
|
No just went very conservative for the first race of the season.
|
||
|
10 Mar 2003, 00:10 (Ref:530803) | #3 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 40
|
The weather was colder then usual in the race. The engines weren't under the regular stress of the heat. The clutch plates would be the first things to break I thought. Considering many cars entered the pits more then once.
|
||
|
10 Mar 2003, 03:11 (Ref:530882) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
Yeah,it was because of the lack of heat/racepace
...although i am hoping they all have done better ...But then again,the sunday honda BBQ has become abit of a nice tradition! |
||
|
10 Mar 2003, 04:58 (Ref:530928) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
well both of the Jags had mech failures, So did one Minardi and I think there were one or two others so not really that few as compared to normal
|
||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
10 Mar 2003, 06:42 (Ref:530961) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,212
|
Yup...quite a suprise because of no engine failures. Setups! that's why there were so many run offs...teams on intermediate might have had the car setup for wet condition.
|
||
__________________
more hors3epower |
10 Mar 2003, 17:00 (Ref:531675) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
There were only a few mechanical failures, which was impressive. Even Minardi got a car to the flag, albeit the spare. Clearly the new rules had no negative effect on reliability.
|
||
|
10 Mar 2003, 17:03 (Ref:531679) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,707
|
i was very suprised at the lack of engine failures, what was the reason given for Wilsons retirement, appart from that i cant remember any others.
|
||
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now" Douglas Adams. 1952-2001 |
10 Mar 2003, 19:11 (Ref:531855) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,035
|
I heard he got a stone in the radiator, well thats what Ceefax suggests anyway.
|
||
__________________
le bad boy |
10 Mar 2003, 20:00 (Ref:531913) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
The point is the first race didn't have the typical 1/2 DNFs due to reliability. I was quiet surprised. I guess that's the result of a mature formula and teams learning it's better to finish than to go out in a blaze of glory.
|
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
10 Mar 2003, 21:04 (Ref:532009) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,245
|
Or maybe everybody switched to saving-my-engine mode.
|
||
__________________
"ignorantia legis neminem excusat" |
10 Mar 2003, 23:29 (Ref:532194) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
Cars have been getting more reliable with every season. More and more nowadays cars retire due to spins or accidents, usually the latter...
|
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
11 Mar 2003, 06:47 (Ref:532404) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,867
|
Perhaps the reduced testing time Friday and Saturday had a role too. Besides the cool weather.
|
||
|
11 Mar 2003, 13:12 (Ref:532611) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 729
|
it seemed Webber and Heidfeld both had suspension failiures - was this due to contact or what?
|
||
|
11 Mar 2003, 18:59 (Ref:533074) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,376
|
BAR seemed to be the real mechanical miracle of the race. They went thru a load of engines in practice, but they got it right for the race as both cars finished.
Good job by BAR team! |
||
__________________
"I don't feel insecure about 'being girlie'. I do as much media as I can because I want this IRL series to be so kick-butt that NASCAR goes, 'Huh?'" Danica Patrick |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel/Mechanical Problems on the Last Lap | Snrub | ChampCar World Series | 5 | 10 Feb 2005 21:42 |
Mechanical Sympathy... | shiny side up! | Formula One | 39 | 19 Jun 2004 22:31 |
Michaels mechanical reliability | Mr V | Formula One | 29 | 28 Sep 2003 23:37 |
Mechanical Sympathy | FalconEL | Australasian Touring Cars. | 19 | 4 Jul 2003 23:28 |
Can a driving style cause mechanical failures nowadays? | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 26 | 2 Jul 2002 08:22 |