|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Nov 2002, 15:39 (Ref:434728) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Bridgestone voices safety concerns
Can someone copy and paste the story from autosport.com on this matter, I cannot access it, and no other website has this story.
Many thanks. |
||
|
22 Nov 2002, 15:58 (Ref:434742) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 230
|
Bridgestone voices safety concerns
Hisao Suganuma explains implications of new rules Teams will have no wet weather tyre choice in 2003 Formula 1's new rule of allowing its tyre manufacturers to bring just one type of wet-weather rubber to each grand prix in 2003, could have safety implications. That is the view of Bridgestone's technical manager Hisao Suganuma, who believes the limitation to one tread pattern and compound is too severe. "Personally, I would prefer to have at least two types of rain tyre allowed at each event," he said. "Reducing the range of rain tyres available to just one specification does have safety implications. Weather conditions are completely unpredictable. In my view, a choice of tyre is necessary but we have to work within the new regulations" "Even though the decision on which specification to take to each race will be taken very carefully, in the end the weather may not be as expected and the tyre may not suit the particular conditions we encounter on any given day. "In my view, a choice of tyre is necessary but we have to work within the new regulations so this represents another fresh challenge for us." Bridgestone is to increase its wet tyre development to find the best compounds and tread patterns in the next three weeks of pre-Christmas F1 testing. |
||
__________________
How comes abbreviation is such a long word? |
22 Nov 2002, 18:57 (Ref:434855) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
They should start investigating whether they can create "intelligent" rubber. Like it would alter the compund stiffness, possibly even sidewall characteristics and the like depending on the environmental conditions surrounding.
I have no idea if this is possible, or if it is whether it would be allowed or not (I suspect not since the tyres have to have a common performance throughout, I think), but I would still investigate it if I was them. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
22 Nov 2002, 20:03 (Ref:434898) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,421
|
I suspect this rule is just to give Michelin teams a better chance in wet conditions. But Michelin need far more wet weather experience.
|
|
|
23 Nov 2002, 00:19 (Ref:435077) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Strange I can't remember Bridgestone's wet tyres being as bad in their first years of F1.
|
||
|
23 Nov 2002, 01:49 (Ref:435092) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 6,038
|
I wonder if this the first step towards all-weather tires in F1... just a thought...
|
||
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes |
24 Nov 2002, 04:37 (Ref:435622) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 459
|
http://www.michelinf1.com/content/xml/3types_en.xml Check out the difference in tread between the intermediate and wet tire. Is a "true" compromise possible at this point? Doubt it.
Who came up with this idea anyway? |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bridgestone blame Safety Car period for tyre issue | Nicholosophy | Formula One | 29 | 20 May 2005 03:22 |
F1 safety concerns | Gabrio | Formula One | 30 | 16 Feb 2005 16:21 |
Concerns about dehydration safety! | Hugh Jarce | Formula One | 25 | 26 Mar 2003 15:13 |