|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
27 Oct 2005, 00:27 (Ref:1444633) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Lola
Interesting article on Lola and Champcar:
http://www.champcarworldseries.com/N...le.asp?ID=9796 I remember some posters on this forum saying that Lola hadn't built any new cars for a while so there were some nice figures on sales numbers for the B2/00's 2000 19 2001 22 2002 32 2003 4 2004 2 2005 2 Looks like champcar has been a nice business for Lola. Sad to see them go. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
28 Oct 2005, 12:32 (Ref:1446013) | #2 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
|
The Lola are really built to last and must be good quality if you consider how many are running and how few have been sold recently, pity loyalty doesn't count for much with Champcar bosses.
|
|
|
28 Oct 2005, 12:34 (Ref:1446014) | #3 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
|
And i think the new Lola Champ CAr looked much better than the Painoz
|
|
|
28 Oct 2005, 14:50 (Ref:1446101) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,759
|
If another car is just as good (or even better) but the price is lower and you know that lower costs could mean more cars, what would you do?
Opt for the more expensive car? This has nothing to do with loyalty, pure financial, to survive. |
||
|
28 Oct 2005, 15:24 (Ref:1446121) | #5 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
|
I think the prices would have been very close (although clearly the exchange rate going forward is an unknown), cheapest is not always best, the aero performance of the new car whilst in close proximity to other cars is important, I think Lola with its in house windtunnel etc is best placed to produce a guaranteed result.
|
|
|
28 Oct 2005, 17:07 (Ref:1446187) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Compared to 10 or 20 years ago we now have the ability to design and build top quality formula cars in the USA. I don't see the exchange rate moving in the USA's favor anytime soon. It's sad to see Lola go, but it may be better with an American manufacturer for logistic and financial reasons.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
2 Nov 2005, 10:01 (Ref:1450231) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
The only concern is about panoz' ability to fulfill their commitments is what seems to be their biggest contract ever.
|
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
2 Nov 2005, 18:21 (Ref:1450682) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
This is why Panoz is going to have a busy 2006. They have to get ready for not only the construction of the chassis, but also the parts to support them. Plus backups and possibly training for the teams on how to maintain the cars.
But Panoz is a very professional company, like Lola. I am sure that they can handle it! |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lola T 97/30 | ss_collins | The Chassis History Archive | 2 | 26 Dec 2007 15:25 |
Lola-MG | BSchneiderFan | Sportscar & GT Racing | 12 | 9 Jul 2003 07:36 |
Lola | Osella | Sportscar & GT Racing | 14 | 25 Aug 2002 12:37 |
Lola | cv2000 | National & International Single Seaters | 12 | 18 Jun 2002 05:36 |