Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 Jun 2000, 15:23 (Ref:6328)   #1
Franklin
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location:
Orlando, Florida, US
Posts: 211
Franklin should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Since CART, IRL, and F1 races are the only opportunity most people have to see how well sandwich composite construction holds up in a crash, many apparently come to assume that you have to have a $200,000 or $400,000 car to get that kind of strength. In reality, that kind of strength is inherent in almost any well made sandwich composite structure. The first person to survive a 200 mph crash while inside a sandwich composite monocoque was in 1983 at the Reno air races.
Franklin is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jun 2000, 17:14 (Ref:6329)   #2
KC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 2,762
KC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Laminated composites aren't new. In fact Rockwell created the stuff right here in Tulsa a lot longer before it was ever used for anything other than military applications. The place I work made the original layup presses for Rockwell that was contracted for F16 wing elements. Now, there are several small carbon-fiber layup shops in and around Tulsa that make parts for racecars and are becoming quite common. Most of the top fuel rail wing elements are made by a small company here in Tulsa, as well as some lightweight covers and boxes made of carbon fiber. The real trick to doing layup work is molding in the compound curves and elliptical intersections found in most race car bodies and monocoques. Some of this is real art work.
KC is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jun 2000, 19:15 (Ref:6330)   #3
Robin Plummer
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
England
Chelmsford, Essex, England
Posts: 326
Robin Plummer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Franklin shouldnt you be on the technical forum?
Robin Plummer is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jun 2000, 22:10 (Ref:6331)   #4
mapguy
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location:
Albany, NY, USA
Posts: 31
mapguy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Robin Plummer:
Franklin shouldnt you be on the technical forum?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

He should be on prozac.

mapguy is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jun 2000, 23:24 (Ref:6332)   #5
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
hehehehe
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2000, 06:38 (Ref:15779)   #6
floid2000
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location:
vero beach,florida,US
Posts: 276
floid2000 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Has anybody ever tried an F-16 "tub" in a race car like they use in the Hydroplanes ? Theyre VERY safe and wouldnt even get scratched at 250 MPH.
Maybe cost is the issue
floid2000 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aerofoil construction Tainan Racing Technology 5 16 Jun 2005 13:20
New pits under construction ! Fab Sportscar & GT Racing 36 15 Apr 2002 16:10
Race Car Construction KC Cool Sites 1 10 Oct 2001 03:05


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.