Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 Jul 2002, 20:22 (Ref:345703)   #1
billiaml
Racer
 
billiaml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
United States
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
Posts: 174
billiaml should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
engine rule

Minardi will be making an announcement sometime within the next month or so regarding their engine supplier for next year. And one of the rumored possibilities is Cosworth -- and Jordan has also been named as possibly using Cosworth power next year, too. BUT, Nikki Lauda has said that Cosworth will only supply 2 teams -- Jaguar and 1 other. Assuming Arrows is also using Cosworth next year (and, considering the way things have gone these last couple weeks, that's not completely guaranteed), there's a potential for 4 interested customers.

I seem to recall something about a proposed or upcoming rule regarding the number of engines that a team can use in a given weekend. However I can't remember whether a) it was actually a rule or simply a proposal and b) what's the rule?

Because, if that is the case, Cosworth could find itself with excess capacity -- and supplying 4 teams could be a more viable option than it is now.
billiaml is offline  
__________________
Can I help it if I think you're funny when you're mad?
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2002, 10:20 (Ref:346152)   #2
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
I think the proposal was to make all engine suppliers have to be able to supply at least 2 teams, if the demand was there. Which would mean that Lauda only has to supply 1 other team, but there's no upper limit, so if he feels that they have the capacity to supply engines to 4 teams, they can do that (though frankly I think he'd be crazy)
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2002, 10:40 (Ref:346168)   #3
MiniMe
Racer
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Noosa, Sunshine Coast
Posts: 413
MiniMe should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Asiatech was making noise about entering F1 as a complete team, though I reckon they have more apprenticeship yet to serve. Plus, the privateers HAVE to get in bed with the engine suppliers, otherwise go bust.

Stoddart has to realise that Minardi's main problem is engine technology, so he either demands Asiatech gets more power or find the money for another supplier.

Maybe Flavio will trade an engine for a testing spot for another of his protege's
MiniMe is offline  
__________________
Let no way be the way - let no limitation be the limitation!
The late great Bruce Lee
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2002, 11:09 (Ref:346191)   #4
Lee Janotta
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,936
Lee Janotta should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ford needs to separate the Rat from having any control over who Cosworth does or doesn't supply. They've always been there for the rest of the grid before. Teams absolutely depend on having access to at least a passably competitive engine at an acceptable price, and since their involvement began, that's meant going to Cosworth.

And let's be totally honest, Ford's got a _much_ better chance of a car winning a championship with the blue oval on the airbox if it's a Jordan than a Jaguar.
Lee Janotta is offline  
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!"
-Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2002, 13:51 (Ref:346332)   #5
billiaml
Racer
 
billiaml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
United States
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
Posts: 174
billiaml should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree with u on both counts. The rat should stick to being the team principal & let someone else take care of Cosworth.

Asiatech definitely needs to take some lessons from what Ford has done these past couple years. Even tho Renault has had a measure of success so far, doing both the engine & chassis isn't as easy as it looks.

The proposed engine rule that I was thinking about was more of a cost-saving measure similar to what they're doing in NASCAR by limiting teams to 1 engine per weekend as opposed to using 1 engine for practice, another for qualifying and a third for the race. Or maybe it was just that, after NASCAR announced their rule, a debate started as to whether or not F1 should do it as well.
billiaml is offline  
__________________
Can I help it if I think you're funny when you're mad?
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine rule clarified? Marbot Formula One 57 18 Mar 2005 01:10
Two races per engine rule. XJR14/WSC95 Formula One 2 17 Jan 2005 11:12
1 engine rule RWC Formula One 4 28 Sep 2003 12:46
One engine rule Wrex Formula One 5 16 Feb 2003 06:06
One engine rule Roselady3 NASCAR & Stock Car Racing 28 29 Dec 2001 16:08


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:45.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.