|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Nov 2004, 17:25 (Ref:1144902) | #1 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 478
|
GM Not Interested
Taken From The Seattle Times regarding GM leaving the IRL after 2005
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
racinthestreets "If dreams don't come true - are they lies?" The Boss |
4 Nov 2004, 17:28 (Ref:1144907) | #2 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
ChampCar bosses want to keep a single engine supplier.
It keeps costs down and keeps stability in the series. |
|
|
4 Nov 2004, 17:40 (Ref:1144925) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
It's been rumoured for a while that if Kalkhoven bought cosworth that there would be an offer to GM to co-badge the new champ car engine. We'll see.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
4 Nov 2004, 19:28 (Ref:1145011) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 341
|
GM is moving away from 'open wheel' because it is not a good return on their investmant (that is what they are saying). If TG and the Indy 500 does not make sense, I really don't see what CCWS has to offer them right now.....unless, of course KK would pay them to badge an engine, and I find that very doubtful.
NASCAR with Chevy and Pontiac, and Grand AM with Pontiac seems to be their focus. They have just announced a new GTO program for GARRA's GT class next year. They also have the Corvette program in ALMS, and Caddy program in Speed World Challange. Both seem very successful for them as well. Last edited by Brian W Keske; 4 Nov 2004 at 19:33. |
||
__________________
Cleveland (Lakewood), Ohio |
4 Nov 2004, 19:56 (Ref:1145047) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
In terms of CC engines Ford essentially pays to have their name associated with them. Theoretically some other company might be interested in doing the same. A GM brand would make some sense because they wouldn't have to worry about other companies comming along and out spending them. How many millions do they spend gambling for success in both ALMS and World Challange compared to a sure thing for perhaps the same cost in CC?
Last edited by Snrub; 4 Nov 2004 at 20:00. |
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
4 Nov 2004, 20:48 (Ref:1145088) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 341
|
Good questions Snrub.
As we are not privy to these board room meetings, they must be looking at ROI reports and comparing various series. It looks like they (GM) feel 'open wheel' formula style racing in the USA is not meeting their expecatations w/the IRL, and do not feel CCWS would be any better. Perhaps worse. We don't know if they are looking for sales/financing vs. 'general' name exposure/recognition. The ALMS and World Speed Challange makes sense to me, but GARRA? Who is watching? On TV, or at the track, the audiance numbers are dismal. |
||
__________________
Cleveland (Lakewood), Ohio |
4 Nov 2004, 21:10 (Ref:1145101) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,301
|
Putting your product (engine, tires, oil, or otherwise) in a race car only pays if you are winning, at least on a fairly regular basis. You then have to spend money to make it. If you compare the alternatives of where GM can spend it's money to get a return it's pretty easy to see that open wheel racing is not the place to be unless you have a deal like Ford with Champ Car and you can't be beat.
There has been continual talk on the forums about 90% of the fans anymore are just casual fans. If that is the case, which it probably is, you can reach most of those casual fans by running ads about your cars during the races instaed of actually racing them and get a lot bigger bang for the buck because the casual fans don't realize or care if your engine is in the car that won or lost. This holds true for just about any formula raced in North America except NASCAR. Couple all of that with the circumstances of shareholder returns (bad, bad, bad, for motorsport) and the choice for GM becomes simple. |
||
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!" |
4 Nov 2004, 22:56 (Ref:1145184) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,409
|
For how long is the contract for Cosworth to supply engines?
|
||
|
5 Nov 2004, 00:17 (Ref:1145227) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 478
|
I think it is for this year only. No renewal that I know of.
|
||
__________________
racinthestreets "If dreams don't come true - are they lies?" The Boss |
5 Nov 2004, 03:50 (Ref:1145273) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 865
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Nov 2004, 04:27 (Ref:1145279) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 996
|
In other words, the best driver...
|
||
|
5 Nov 2004, 05:11 (Ref:1145286) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Can't argue with that, Omega!
|
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
5 Nov 2004, 05:13 (Ref:1145287) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
...drewdawg was that a sarcastic comment? Don't we want the best driver to win, rather then the best equipment?
Brian, you're most likely correct. As you suggest I suspect they like the tie in to their product lines. They probably think that people buy Cavaliers and Malibus because people have a favorable impression of an unrealted shadow body Corvette. I think that impression is true when we are talking about Cadys. Realistically I think GM's problem is that their brand images stink (and rightfully so). Everyone knows the Corvette is an anomoly for GM. For GM to improve public preception, they need to have highest level succes because people don't pay nearly as much attention to the GTS Corvette as the Audi R8. A gaurenteed competitive CC engine deal is perfect from that perspective. As for Grand Am support, I think GM made the right call. The series might have some serious problems, but considering it's growth rate, competitive racing amd low-cost, I don't think it will be a problem long term. Besides, when was the last time you saw a GM branded race engine have more power then a Toyota? |
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
5 Nov 2004, 12:38 (Ref:1145491) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,409
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Nov 2004, 13:33 (Ref:1145525) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,301
|
I think a lot of that will depend on who ends up with Cosworth Racing. In reading between the lines on a lot of things I have the impression that the engine formula is stable through the '06 season. No guarantee, just an implied desire. I'll see if I can find some links.
|
||
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!" |
5 Nov 2004, 18:39 (Ref:1145687) | #16 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 478
|
Seems like I remember about March or April that Ford declined to renew the contract. The question is does the current contract run through 2005?
|
||
__________________
racinthestreets "If dreams don't come true - are they lies?" The Boss |
5 Nov 2004, 19:16 (Ref:1145716) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,301
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!" |
5 Nov 2004, 20:36 (Ref:1145770) | #18 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
7 Nov 2004, 03:13 (Ref:1146478) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
I personally feel that having GM in Champ Cars would be an overall good thing because of the potential competition between them and Ford. Champ Cars can definitely market that. And I think that it'll make for a very interesting series.
It's like the bitter competition between Honda and Toyota, only that the average North American doesn't know how deep their competitive natures are. But people here definitely know how competitive GM and Ford are with each other. To me it seems pretty ovbious! |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
7 Nov 2004, 05:59 (Ref:1146512) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
And now that GM is globalizing the chevrolet brand it's a prime time to jump in. Ford already said earlier this year that they would welcome another manufacturer in champcar.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
7 Nov 2004, 07:39 (Ref:1146522) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
ChampCar, on the other hand, said the exact opposite in a recent interview with AutoSport. Tres Hombres don't seem overly keen on engine competition in the short term.
|
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
7 Nov 2004, 08:32 (Ref:1146544) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,183
|
Didn't Chevy say recently that they weren't interested in joining another OW series :confused:
|
||
__________________
Give them good ol' boys the chrome horn PT! |
7 Nov 2004, 08:33 (Ref:1146545) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Yes. Very recently.
The thread seems to be aptly named. |
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RBR interested in JPM | Mr V | Formula One | 36 | 25 Mar 2006 04:09 |
[TV] Just if anyone is interested | MacMan | Armchair Enthusiast | 10 | 8 Jan 2004 13:48 |
[Magazines] anyone interested | rocket | Armchair Enthusiast | 3 | 17 Jul 2003 14:44 |
For anybody who's interested....... | Gaz | National & International Single Seaters | 1 | 18 Feb 2002 21:26 |