|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 Mar 2007, 10:37 (Ref:1869006) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 522
|
Champ car undertray
Hi all,
Im wondering if anybody has photos of the undertray of a champ car. Reason is im working on a formula SAE car for university and we are researching the possibility of implementing ground effects on the car this year. So if theres any photos of the undertray of the car lying around that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. |
|
|
18 Mar 2007, 08:48 (Ref:1869953) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,943
|
Ground effects at 40 kph?
|
||
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive. |
18 Mar 2007, 09:18 (Ref:1869970) | #3 | ||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 319
|
I don’t have any pictures to show, but I have looked at most undertrays on any kind of race car. Aero is an area where it is very hard to "copy" anything
as small variations is of big influence. However, it is a good idea to take a close look at what has been done to other cars as it might enlighten one about layouts. As Notso ask, "Ground effects at 40 kph?", I have tried a flat underside at different rake and at a ground setting of 3". Measured at the shifter location under the car and at 90 mph it could be raked to pull 3" of water. But as well to produce a lift, raked the other way. The area under the car is quite large so we will have some "effect", and a simple calculation will tell what will happen at other speeds. But of course we got other numbers out the sides of the car. I am not a guru of ground effect, but I have seen that understanding "aero" is mandatory to get results, and what we see on other cars must be looked at in its relation to circumstances. Not really an answer to your Q, just some thinking... Regards Goran Malmberg |
||
|
18 Mar 2007, 11:22 (Ref:1870061) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 522
|
Yeah, eventhough the cars genarally only corner at 60kph, if done correctly GE can actually still help. Performance isnt the reason we are doing it though, its to give the team an opportunity to learn about it and understand it which will be invaluable experience down the road.
|
|
|
18 Mar 2007, 13:13 (Ref:1870175) | #5 | |||
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
I am working with designing a Corvette right now, which is supposed to take advantage of Gf . I will show some numbers later on which could be interesting as it is a "one man job without very much money". Which means that it is the kind of result anybody could calculate to get (or hopefully better ). Allthrought I am 63 years old I am doing this for the same reason as you, learn more. Goran Malmberg |
|||
|
19 Mar 2007, 10:37 (Ref:1871232) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
There has been tons of media coverage of the new Panoz Champcar so I'd be surprised if there weren't some images of the underbody in one of the technical magazines.
You may also want to look at the GP2 tunnel/skirt configuration? |
|
|
19 Mar 2007, 12:14 (Ref:1871320) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 508
|
Quote:
Copying F1 or Champ Car ideas is the quickest way to losing in FSAE IMHO. Questions: Do you have a good wind tunnel? Do you have access to good CFD software? Do you know how to use the CFD software NOW? If the answer to any of those questions is no, don't do an aero package for the car. A bad aero package is worse than no aero package in FSAE. Ben |
|||
|
19 Mar 2007, 12:48 (Ref:1871345) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 522
|
To answer your questions:
Kinda yes yes At the moment we arnt deffinately going to incorperate in into the car, its just a research and investigation stage for now. We dont want to copy CC type undertrays but we want to study them and learn how they work. If anythign this year will be a simple design to help the team learn about GE and progressivly research and develop it for the coming years. |
|
|
19 Mar 2007, 14:43 (Ref:1871432) | #9 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 48
|
if you're doing this to learn, don't put it on the car at competition. the judges will tear you in two.
|
||
__________________
"A racecar engineer can only sleep in one bed, but he can fill that bed with many women." --Claude Rouelle |
20 Mar 2007, 07:44 (Ref:1872031) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 508
|
Quite right - we will :-)
Either design it as an integral part of the car from day 1 or not. Don't add it in later. By all means do the research, but be big enough to realise that you need to wait a year to put it on a car. Ben |
||
|
27 Mar 2007, 10:29 (Ref:1877505) | #11 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
|
Hi,
If I am your FSAE Judge, you REALLY need to be able to justify your aero decision! PC |
|
|
27 Mar 2007, 15:54 (Ref:1877732) | #12 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 48
|
don't take it lightly. the teams with the BEST aero packages (UMR etc), 100s of hours in the tunnel, excellent 3d CFD models, the whole shebang, still get killed in design.
|
||
__________________
"A racecar engineer can only sleep in one bed, but he can fill that bed with many women." --Claude Rouelle |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Forsythe Annouces Four-Car Superteam For 2006 Champ Car Atlantic Championship | coyote9999 | ChampCar World Series | 14 | 14 Jan 2006 21:52 |
Johannson makes it official: A two car Champ car team in 2003 | Jay | ChampCar World Series | 20 | 23 Dec 2002 17:55 |