|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
23 Feb 2002, 14:21 (Ref:221232)
|
#1 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,189
 |
Ferrari will use a Sauber painted in red ?
Only kidding. They would if the backup slaves are faster than Schumacher on friday. We will see....LOL
|
||
|
|
|
23 Feb 2002, 15:11 (Ref:221242)
|
#2 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 496
|
 hahahah.... Well, that will help to patch up the failure of the f2002.
|
||
|
|
__________________
Greatness does not consist in receiving honours but in deserving them. Aristotle
|
|
23 Feb 2002, 20:17 (Ref:221333)
|
#3 | ||
|
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,944
 |
Well there's obviously something wrong with the new car - they wouldn't want to use the "old" car unless the new one wasn't up to scratch, would they?
|
||
|
|
__________________
280 days......
|
|
23 Feb 2002, 21:40 (Ref:221380)
|
#4 | ||
 Race OfficialVeteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,038
|
They say it's beacuse they haven't got total reliability on the new car yet.
|
||
|
|
__________________
The Priest Catcher Honoured recipient of the BARC Browning Medal
|
|
23 Feb 2002, 21:42 (Ref:221381)
|
#5 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,759
|
and a new combination of engine/gearbox that apparently isn't 100% legal yet
|
||
|
|
|
|
23 Feb 2002, 22:21 (Ref:221408)
|
#6 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,035
|
Stranger, you've been listening to Ron too much...
If they havent got a race distance on the car yet then should they really risk it? Or are they gonna play a practical joke and take the F2002s just to make everyone look stupid? |
||
|
|
__________________
le bad boy
|
|
24 Feb 2002, 00:56 (Ref:221495)
|
#7 | |||
|
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 289
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
24 Feb 2002, 01:24 (Ref:221504)
|
#8 | |||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,491
 |
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
24 Feb 2002, 04:56 (Ref:221560)
|
#9 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 479
|
Ferrari are probably starting with the F2001 for partly all the reasons mentioned here...not to mention from Max and Bernie's POV; it would help liven up the championship if Michael and Ferrari have a bit of a deficit after the first few races.
|
||
|
|
|
|
24 Feb 2002, 11:42 (Ref:221642)
|
#10 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 663
|
All this stuff about leagality and trouble with the F2002 is silly. Ferrari are only taking the F2001 because their is a higher attricion rate in the early races and their F2001 car is already a great car (look at their season last year). The track suits the F2001 so it looks like a very good idea.
All of ferraris rival have their fingers crossed that they are quicker that the F2001 because if they can not match the F2001 haw in hell are they going to beat the F2002. (sorry about the spelling but I am an australian) |
||
|
|
__________________
It is not enough to succeed. Others must fail - Gore Vidal
|
|
24 Feb 2002, 12:46 (Ref:221662)
|
#11 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,491
|
Must have come in on the Tampa
|
||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sauber to drop the Ferrari engines in 06? | Snapple | Formula One | 26 | 9 Feb 2005 18:17 |
| Ferrari and Sauber sharing more than everyone thought | Jukebox | Formula One | 33 | 19 Mar 2004 21:39 |
| Sauber / Ferrari agreement - legal? | Sodemo | Formula One | 26 | 16 Jan 2004 18:38 |
| Sauber to use same engine as ferrari in 04 | eein | Formula One | 16 | 13 Jan 2004 10:41 |
| Do F1 cars have to be painted? | Sharky | Racing Technology | 11 | 10 Jan 2001 20:10 |
Linear Mode
