|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
19 Oct 2003, 08:33 (Ref:755624) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
Penalties
I don't know if the simple ten-second penalty awarded to Rossi is fair.
It's a fact that a jump start is given a stop-go penalty. Why is passing under the yellows not given the same penalty when the advantage is the same? Jump-start - a rider can make an unfair advantage (for example, Debon in Malaysia) Passing under yellow - make up a position illegally - unfair advantage. IMO both should either have a stop-go penalty or a simple 10 second add-on to the race time. (BTW, I'm taking nothing away from Rossi's superb victory. This is just a question I've been pondering.) |
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
19 Oct 2003, 08:57 (Ref:755640) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,508
|
I agree entirely, I think he should have gotten a stop go penalty. IMO passing under a yellow is a worse offence than a jump start because it is a safety issue designed to protect the track marshalls, not just taking an unfair advantage. Maybe they should change the flag colour, he obviously cant recognise bright yellow. Brilliant ride though!
Glad to hear Troy is OK, that fall looked very nasty. |
||
__________________
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. {Oscar Wilde} |
19 Oct 2003, 09:24 (Ref:755654) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 920
|
i think that a 10 second penalty for a jump start would be a lot fairer then a stop-go (you may as well pull into the pits if you get a stop-go).
And i do agree that passing under yellow is worse then a jumpstart. yellow is a safety issue, jumpstart is about fairness. |
||
|
19 Oct 2003, 09:55 (Ref:755694) | #4 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,475
|
Do they have Stop-Go in MotoGP?
|
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
19 Oct 2003, 10:40 (Ref:755764) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,538
|
Would have been a bit more interesting if he had been given a drive/ride through penalty...........
We would have got to watch him carve his way through the field..... |
|
__________________
If your not confused......You dont know whats going on... Diesel..........The fuel of the future |
19 Oct 2003, 12:16 (Ref:755840) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 747
|
Don't agree stop go penalties ruin racing.Ten second penalty was sufficient under the circumstances.
|
||
__________________
Lend me your brain I am building an idiot. |
19 Oct 2003, 14:00 (Ref:755950) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
You think the 10 second penalty didn't ruin the race?
It was a borefest! A stop and go would at least have given us some 'carve through the field' action! Last edited by ASCII Man; 19 Oct 2003 at 14:02. |
|
|
19 Oct 2003, 15:08 (Ref:756057) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
the stop&Go doesn ruin our races . but do ruin riders races .. ..
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
19 Oct 2003, 15:18 (Ref:756064) | #9 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
I dont care if it makes the racing more or less exciting, it's a punishment to a rider not a 'spice things up' penalty.
Although I'm a Rossie supporter, I thought the penalty was ridiculious. Passing under a yellow is as bad as it gets (and can be quiet dangerous) and he should have got a drive through. |
||
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael |
19 Oct 2003, 22:22 (Ref:756386) | #10 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 19
|
rossi should have had to pull into pit lane and take a stop / go penalty. maybe 5 seconds? u see in formula 1 how long it takes to come into the pits and stop . as to fair or not tough, what if rossi had taken out one of the marshalls or docs seeing to bayliss? i know there was no chance of it today but that is what the yellow flags are there for .
|
||
__________________
Those who risk nothing, do nothing, achieve nothing, become nothing- tribute on dave jefferies tombstone-fastest man on the Isle of Man 1972-2003 RIP |
20 Oct 2003, 00:40 (Ref:756469) | #11 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 298
|
I think that they should make those damn flags more visible for the riders.
Somehow I doubt that they miss them on purpose. |
||
__________________
Sideways is always more fun. |
20 Oct 2003, 07:51 (Ref:756639) | #12 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,265
|
i think 10 sec penalties are the way to go - ride through penalties are shyte and ruin races .... as for rossi yesterday - how could he see that flag
|
||
|
20 Oct 2003, 08:11 (Ref:756653) | #13 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 274
|
The problem is the stupid rule for GP's. If there was a stationary yellow the point before then Rossi wouldn't off had anything to complian about.
|
||
|
20 Oct 2003, 13:48 (Ref:757000) | #14 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9
|
I don't think the problem is the lack of a stationary yellow, (although I think that this is a better system) after all, for MotoGP you have to have 3 waved yellows before an incident so there should be more of an opportunity to see them.
I agree that the penalties are the wrong way round though. I have come close to being flattened a few times by riders not slowing down for incidents, and I have seen marshals injured on more than one occasion. It's my neck out there and if the competitors ignore my safety I would penalise them heavily , world champions or not. |
||
__________________
Bruce Parrot |
21 Oct 2003, 11:18 (Ref:758125) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,058
|
It's a tough call. I think it's a fair call under the circumstances. While it was a difficult flag to see, it's not impossible.
You cannot compare the penalty for two different situations like jump start and overtaking under yellow. There are too many variables for each to say what set penalty should be applied. |
||
|
21 Oct 2003, 23:48 (Ref:758869) | #16 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 474
|
The ten second penalty is fare. It is not the penalties fault that in this day and age a rider is good enough to pull that sort of gap in that short a time. Maybe the stewards need to sit down and make it say 15 or 20 second penalty and loss of 10 points or something.
|
||
__________________
"And to all those who oppose, Hmm well" Guns n Roses |
25 Oct 2003, 11:38 (Ref:762588) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
it makes you wonder if rossi had of kept the win at donnington had he been aware of the penalty during the race, quite simply the penalties are the wrong way round, a jump start is not a safety issue, if you take things one step further then you could have riders deliberatly passing under yellows knowing they will gain more than 10 seconds advantage.
|
||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Penalties: | Saloon56 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 8 | 9 Oct 2005 10:10 |
Should there be penalties? | Knowlesy | Formula One | 37 | 28 Sep 2004 06:25 |
EC Penalties | rdmdog | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 14 Apr 2004 01:58 |
Too many penalties?! | DNQ | Australasian Touring Cars. | 7 | 15 May 2001 06:05 |
Penalties? | Gerard | Formula One | 6 | 21 Jun 2000 03:18 |