|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Mar 2012, 13:47 (Ref:3038307) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 867
|
Air bags v. Thin pillars
I'm getting on a bit now, and I'm a little bit stiff when I turn my head. It happens to us all in time.
I have noticed that when I parallel-park I have real problems being able to see what I'm doing, and have to rely on the door mirrors. That shouldn't be a difficulty to any reasonably competent driver, but that's hardly the point. Looking over my left shoulder :- The driver's head restraint completely blocks the rear window The passenger's head restraint blocks about a third of the rear nearside window The C-pillar blocks the bit in between The frustrating bit is that it's all in the name of safety - I know that I can remove the head restraints, but it's the airbag factor which is now so important to manufacturers. Only the number of cup-holders seems to be a more saleable feature in the brochure. The C-pillar on my Golf must be about 1.5 feet thick. "Back in the day", before all the paranoia, you could actually see all around you whilst driving because of the thin pillars and thus excellent visibility. I'm not anti-safety, but can't there be a happy medium? I've been in many minor accidents, and one or two major ones, but I've never needed an airbag yet. (My daughter hit black ice once, clipped the verge and barrel-rolled twice into a field - not one of the airbags on her Yaris operated). To be honest, given the choice, I'd rather buy a car I could see out of than one with umpteen airbags I'll probably never need. Who else has to peer forward at junctions to see what's coming? I just know at this point you'll all be ready with stories about people you know who had lives saved etc.! Out of curiosity, what would you rather have - more glass or more bags? |
||
|
11 Mar 2012, 16:03 (Ref:3038343) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,446
|
I agree, I drive all sorts of vehicles every day and it seems that it's not only the safety factor aspect that has done it with blind spots caused by very thick A posts but also "fashion".
As for some of the sports supercars they are almost impossible to see out of when reversing, but then I suppose you just get your butler to park it |
||
__________________
Balls of steel (knob of butter) They're Asking For Larkins. ( Proper beer) not you're Eurofizz crap. Hace más calor en España. Me han conocido a hablar un montón cojones! Send any cheques and cash to PO box 1 Lagos Nigeria Africa ! |
11 Mar 2012, 16:07 (Ref:3038344) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Thicker pillars also contribute to better roll-over protection. If it is a problem perhaps think about a rear view camera. (Or Land rover bumpers )
Regards Jim |
||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
11 Mar 2012, 17:13 (Ref:3038374) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 867
|
Quote:
Point taken,but I don't intend to roll unless I have to! I just feel that the whole "elf & safety" thing is being taken to extremes. We're not being given a choice. I don't do technology - sat navs remain unused . It's a lot quicker to look on a map. Maybe it's all just pressure from Governments on the manufacturers, trying to reduce NHS bills. They'll be insisting we wear crash helmets to the shops before long. |
|||
|
12 Mar 2012, 04:10 (Ref:3038620) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,647
|
|||
|
12 Mar 2012, 13:05 (Ref:3038791) | #6 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
it's a fair point, particularly if you prefer hatchbacks. i guess the c-pillar is the one at the back where the boot is? in which case i find that depending on the car, the mirror solves that blind spot, it just needs setting up carefully.
for parking, my most recent 2 cars have had rear parking sensors (audio beepy ones, not the fancy telly dashboard display) which really helped with visibility when parking. i'd definitely recommend trying to pick up your next car with those. |
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
15 Mar 2012, 17:57 (Ref:3041669) | #7 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,479
|
There is, of course, a very simple solution......
|
||
|
16 Mar 2012, 12:18 (Ref:3042171) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 867
|
mmm.... must just get my medallion and chest-wig!
|
||
|
26 Mar 2012, 09:26 (Ref:3048550) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 867
|
Just seen a statistic in today's paper:-
2000 fatalities in UK last year froom road/rail accidents 3000 fatalities in UK last year from "falls" I know there may have been more deaths on the road if air-bags had not been fitted, but all the same! Talk about nanny states - we're not allowed to think for ourselves any more. I expect to be asked to complete a risk-assessment form next time I cross the road, or perhaps wear a crash-helmet on the bus just in case it hits a low bridge. Get rid of these airbags,please! I'm quite prepared to accept the consequences. |
||
|
26 Mar 2012, 09:45 (Ref:3048561) | #10 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,479
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intercooling on a race car. Air to air, or air to water? | Chris Wilson | Racing Technology | 11 | 2 Feb 2009 23:46 |
Thin Orange Line | Ian Lewis | Marshals Forum | 189 | 29 Sep 2003 16:19 |
Thin orange line | Ian Lewis | Trackside | 3 | 29 Jul 2003 14:02 |