|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Mar 2006, 19:08 (Ref:1541888) | #1 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Qually update
Stop and yer out!http://www.crash.net/news_view~t~Sto...~id~126333.htm
|
|
|
9 Mar 2006, 20:15 (Ref:1541923) | #2 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
For those interested the new rule is 116a.http://www.fia.com/resources/documen...EGULATIONS.pdf
|
|
|
10 Mar 2006, 14:22 (Ref:1542888) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 238
|
So that's good -- can see cars now trying to limp back to the pits, dropping oil, fluids and debris everywherre....And then we have to shut down for 10 minutes to clean it all up again! We'll see.....
|
||
__________________
President, MMS, Canada |
10 Mar 2006, 15:53 (Ref:1542971) | #4 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,194
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Mar 2006, 16:45 (Ref:1543008) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,575
|
This is just stupid. So once again a driver is penalised unfairly. Why can't it be like the old days where a driver could just run back into the pits where there would be a mad scramble to get the spare car ready. That used to excite me far more than anything we have seen in the past few seasons.
A poor regulation decision once again. |
||
__________________
#teamyorkshire |
10 Mar 2006, 16:49 (Ref:1543013) | #6 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,194
|
Best cockney voice: It's an outrage I tell you.
It'll make little difference. There aren't any usuable spare cars anyway and how much time do they actually have to get everything ready. In one lap qualifying they didn't have this option anyway. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Mar 2006, 16:54 (Ref:1543016) | #7 | |||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,687
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
10 Mar 2006, 17:04 (Ref:1543019) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
People complain when the attention is taken away from the driver, and now they're complaining about a rule which ensures that driving errors are accurately penalised? Strange. Adam has corectly spotted that there are no spare cars anymore - the change removes an imbalance in terms of how long it takes to return cars at different circutis. In any case, a slightly-damaged car might have attempted to get as close to the pits as possible while dropping debris before this rule change.
|
||
|
10 Mar 2006, 17:22 (Ref:1543032) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 731
|
>>> looking at the regulation it does not say that you will be dropped places, it only says you can take no further part in that session...
|
||
__________________
Examining Specialist, Experienced marshal,Flag marshal. |
10 Mar 2006, 18:41 (Ref:1543096) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
What it does is prevent you from improving. So, whatever the minimum is that that time can attain is all you get.
So, if, for example, you set a time that qualifies you for the next "session", but then come to a stop on track, then the best you can achieve is the last spot of the next session. It is not a direct demotion, but it is potentially less than you otherwise may have achieved. |
||
|
10 Mar 2006, 18:46 (Ref:1543098) | #11 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Mar 2006, 18:51 (Ref:1543105) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Do they enter qualy from parc ferme conditions?
117) Each car will be deemed to be in parc fermé from the time at which it leaves the pit lane for the first time during qualifying practice until the green lights are illuminated at the start of the formation lap which immediately precedes the start of the race. I'm not being picky under the guise of knowing the answer. I am asking because I want to clarify whether or not I am missing something. |
||
|
10 Mar 2006, 19:22 (Ref:1543130) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 731
|
Martyn, read it again it says SESSION not qualifying... qually is now split into 3 sessions.
ie if you stop in session 1 that does not stop you from sessions 2/3 |
||
__________________
Examining Specialist, Experienced marshal,Flag marshal. |
10 Mar 2006, 19:29 (Ref:1543134) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Read the regulations.
They don't speak of qualifying being split into different "sessions". They talk about the qualifying session as one whole. The different segments are "periods". Thus, the regulations mean the entire 60-minute duration when they refer to the "session". |
||
|
10 Mar 2006, 19:59 (Ref:1543150) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 731
|
Thanks Dutton, it now seems as clear as mud lol.
But i believe i now understand it...... |
||
__________________
Examining Specialist, Experienced marshal,Flag marshal. |
10 Mar 2006, 20:13 (Ref:1543157) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Quote:
When taken all together, it is very simple. If a car stops out on track, at any point during the 60-minute duration of the qualifying session, then they can take no further part in the session (i.e. if there is 43 minutes left, then the driver may not partake in any of the remaining 43 minutes). I honestly do not see how it can be clearer. |
|||
|
10 Mar 2006, 21:56 (Ref:1543219) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 995
|
In the first two segments, the segment ends when time is out. I think the usual rule is used in last part. (driver is allowed to finish a lap if he started it before time ran out)
|
||
|
10 Mar 2006, 22:02 (Ref:1543222) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
We are talking about the driver not continuing due to stopping out on track, not the lap/flag question. Unless I am mistaken.
I am not sure about the point you raised. |
||
|
11 Mar 2006, 01:04 (Ref:1543306) | #19 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Mar 2006, 18:41 (Ref:1549704) | #20 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Possible changes to qually..................again!http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=35259
|
|
|
15 Mar 2006, 19:37 (Ref:1549729) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Incidentally, martyn, it seems the drivers can run their last laps like the old way in the final period.
Yep, I wouldn't be surprised to see the cruising aspect altered. It was always going to be like that, given that situation. It doesn't bother me to see the teams doing it, but it does seem rather pointless. |
||
|
15 Mar 2006, 20:13 (Ref:1549767) | #22 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Don't really see the point of the fuel credit laps,at least not from the casual viewer point of view anyway.
They ought to make the last 20 minutes into a mini-race.Now that would be something special. |
|
|
16 Mar 2006, 00:24 (Ref:1549955) | #23 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
16 Mar 2006, 01:09 (Ref:1549963) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 660
|
Simple solution - all cars run same size fuel tanks, and all cars start on full tanks. Then you can circulate to run the fuel down, or leave em heavy. Fuel left after Qual is race start fuel.
|
||
__________________
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce the complete works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know that is not true." -Robert Wilensky |
16 Mar 2006, 02:37 (Ref:1549984) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yet another qually format! | Marbot | Formula One | 23 | 23 Aug 2005 11:08 |
Qually 2 | Hazard | Formula One | 9 | 22 May 2005 11:45 |
First Qually discussion.... | ralf fan | Formula One | 51 | 2 Apr 2005 21:48 |
No change to qually | Marbot | Formula One | 5 | 24 Feb 2005 14:59 |
Qually to change again? | Marbot | Formula One | 48 | 14 Nov 2004 17:41 |