|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
28 Sep 2001, 16:05 (Ref:152729) | #1 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 46
|
Michael's first win.
Wry was Nigel Mansel smiling while Michael was saying how good it felt to beat Nigel fare and square?
|
|
|
28 Sep 2001, 16:31 (Ref:152744) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,189
|
Re: Michael's first win.
Quote:
|
|||
|
28 Sep 2001, 16:39 (Ref:152751) | #3 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 46
|
Why was it a joke?
|
|
|
28 Sep 2001, 16:45 (Ref:152758) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
maybe nigel felt it wasn't fare and square |
||
|
28 Sep 2001, 17:03 (Ref:152767) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,189
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
28 Sep 2001, 19:54 (Ref:152873) | #6 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 46
|
No not a joke Michael thought he had out driven Mansel. But the only reason he won was that Nansel's car had broken an exhaust header and lost considerable power giving the race to Michael. Thats the reason Mansel was smiling while Michael was spouting off.
|
|
|
28 Sep 2001, 20:07 (Ref:152884) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,477
|
Why do you ask the question when you know the answer.
|
|
|
28 Sep 2001, 20:10 (Ref:152886) | #8 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 46
|
Why not you didn't know the answer about Michaels first win.
Last edited by ginazimski; 28 Sep 2001 at 20:12. |
|
|
28 Sep 2001, 23:19 (Ref:153054) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 535
|
|
|
|
29 Sep 2001, 09:56 (Ref:153176) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
I did, but I was probably asleep when you posted!!!
Mansell was doing his usual job at the 1992 Belgian GP, dominating the race, but due to some thoughtful tactics from a certain TGF (seeing his team-mates tyres blistering, he pitted first), he managed to take the lead in the confusion of all the pitstops. Mansell soon closed the gap to TGF to around 5 seconds, but then his exhaust broke (leading Murray to believe his engine was about to go kaput), lost power and he finished 22 seconds behind. Senna would have been a deserving winner. He stayed out on slicks for oh so long, and pitted for wets just when the rain was about to stop. Very unlucky. |
||
|
29 Sep 2001, 15:00 (Ref:153287) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
how did you know TGF saw the blister? |
||
|
30 Sep 2001, 00:46 (Ref:153509) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
TGF fell behind team-mate Brundle after a slight off. Following closely, he later said that he saw his team-mates tyres were starting to blister due to the track drying out, so gambled that the rain had finished and pitted first.
Which proved a masterstroke I guess, as he took the lead and won. |
||
|
30 Sep 2001, 10:39 (Ref:153616) | #13 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 535
|
was it Brundle's turn to pit? if yes then thats wrong, if no, dont see anything wrong with TGF pitting first even if he saw the blisters, Brundle should know better that his tires were 'damaged' and should pit ahead of TGF since he's in front.
|
|
|
30 Sep 2001, 11:23 (Ref:153629) | #14 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Does it really matter. Does anyone seriously believe Nigel "Big Sook" Mansell had any chance against MS in the long term.
Apart from DC and Button, he is the most overated driver in British history. Why don't these former 'hacks' just retire and stay quiet. |
||
|
30 Sep 2001, 12:17 (Ref:153656) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 535
|
Quote:
but they have to make a living still |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Could Michael's new contract be bad for Ralf? | billaboy | Formula One | 11 | 28 Jun 2003 20:48 |
Any guesses on what Michael's... | slicktoast | Formula One | 10 | 6 Apr 2003 01:00 |
Michael's at his best when he's behind the opposition | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 46 | 16 Jun 2002 12:24 |
Michael's new toy | Gt_R | Formula One | 11 | 1 Sep 2001 02:43 |
The seat next to Michael's | Gerard | Formula One | 63 | 30 Jun 2001 14:32 |