|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 Nov 2007, 22:26 (Ref:2078265) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
|
Rise and decline of race series
Once again this winter we have new club racing series being proposed with predictable reactions from competitors and organisers. I have been thinking for a while about how many series have come and gone and there seems to be a recurring pattern.
A fledgling series is formed by club or individual and flourishes or flounders in it’s first season depending on how happy the prospective competitors are once the racing starts. If the series flourishes, over the next few seasons it gains championship status and attracts more entrants, some new, some from other series, all entering for their own reasons. These could be hope of success, wanting to be associated with a succesful series or even just the desire for close and clean competition. The series will now be called succesful in.club racing. But by this point the problems will probably have already started. Those with eligible cars who want to compete will have joined. The cream will have risen to the top and those who only wanted success but haven’t got it will begin to look elsewhere. If the standard of driving has been allowed to deteriorate others will leave. Unless new drivers can be persuaded to begin racing or existing racers be persuaded to get new cars a peak will have been reached. New series may have come along which are more attractive because they allow more or less modifications and therefore cheaper car running costs or lower lap times. As the number of competitors begins to drop bad driving may go un-punished as the organisers seek to keep those racing in their series. The series declines and amalgamates or dies. Although very simplistic, this seems to apply to many series from the past. Everything from special saloons (70’s), Clubmans/ Sports 2000 etc (80’s) to Road saloons/ Mod prods (90,s). Has it always got to be this way? |
||
|
29 Nov 2007, 23:41 (Ref:2078315) | #2 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 45
|
Assuming what you say is true; do you have a view of a different scenario? After all, isn't there a natural lifecycle to these things? And times change, Series and Championships evolve.
|
||
|
30 Nov 2007, 08:43 (Ref:2078495) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
A natural lifecycle is one thing Meldrew (who are you by the way?) a deliberate hijack from within of a successful fledgling racing series is something entirely different especially as that series or organising club has done nothing wrong whatsoever just that someone could not get their own way on something so decided to take their ball away and try to stop the game however other balls can be bought as there are still players interested in the original game.
If Hometunes question is serious and not a windup Al (me) post then I will answer from my personal experiences with ModProds. When we sat down with a blank sheet for the regs and Brian Sheridan's entrapereral zest for gaining sponsorship and getting publisity the championship (it was from day one a championship) kicked off very successfully. In mind at all times was a need to keep costs down but allow guys latitude to construct competitive cars that were fun to drive but within a set budget. That budget was indeed set with a buying plate. Then unfortunately over the passage of time my original carefully prepared regulations slowly got hijacked and changed with naive people putting their oar in and not realising what difference an on the face of it, minor change could really effect the whole balance of the championship also the money boys crept in and campaigned (and got against my better judgement) the buying/selling plate rule dropped I mean who wants to risk an ex-BTTC Tourer or ex-Brock Tourer but the point is that’s not what this championship was about. Another good example of this was freedom of wheel diameters which equated to massively oversized and unnecessary and expensive brakes (we were on list 1a tyres so these massive brakes were not worth the expense) also oversized tyres with Mk2 escorts turning up on massively wide 17/18" rims, it was starting to get silly. This and a series of other stupid railroaded decisions like letting in de-turboed Cossies (Cossies were not allowed in) and latterly after I left other things like Rose joints/Rod ends and allowing cars in like Evo M3's all stacked up to its eventual decline. Also organisations like Combe liked what we were doing after inviting us down there and virtually immediately started their own series Combe Saloons based on our regs to further water down the pool of drivers as did Lydden Hill. Local championships like this and DMN (not knocking them they are doing a great job for the racer who does not want to travel) now take their toll even more with petrol over £1 a litre and just getting to the circuit costing a fortune. However saying all this the championship lasted what 15 years . I would personally call on the MSA to do its job and put a stop to this nonsense and give championships/series a chance to flourish before granting permissions for other start ups that are so similar to others already established. Last edited by Al Weyman; 30 Nov 2007 at 08:51. |
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
30 Nov 2007, 10:13 (Ref:2078568) | #4 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
There is a natural lifecycle because we are all human and all seek new experience. However, so much of this is counter productive and wasteful of organiser and competitor energies. |
|||
|
30 Nov 2007, 10:19 (Ref:2078574) | #5 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 8
|
Victor Meldrew said
Quote:
Chris |
||
|
30 Nov 2007, 10:19 (Ref:2078575) | #6 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
Just thought we might discuss other series and if anyone thinks this cycle can be changed. Last edited by hometune; 30 Nov 2007 at 10:22. |
|||
|
30 Nov 2007, 10:54 (Ref:2078589) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
in that case I appologise for suggesting it Hometune and it is in fact an interesting question you have asked. A lot of it IMHO is in the psychy (spelling?) if race drivers as believe me they can be a very fickle bunch.
It is very easy to get disallousioned with some aspect of a championship and for that to spread like wildfire, what is in one year could be finished the next. Take any leading championship/series, its riding high but something could easy change maybe guys getting fed up with being blown into the weeds by a handful of front runners, anything. As racing is run generally by unpaid amatuers it can creep up on you then wham its too late to address as organisers are often last to hear paddock gossip and mumblings. Prehaps with the internet and boards like this what is going down can feed back and be addressed by organisers more readilly than in the old days. |
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
30 Nov 2007, 12:38 (Ref:2078648) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,686
|
Examples of series that recovered from a slump -
Castle Combe GT's Ford Mod Prods It certainly can be done but takes a massive amount of effort to rejuvenate/relaunch. I think most people involved generally don't have the time or money to do it. In both those instances there was the desire and resources to ride through the 'rough patch', adapt the series to what people wanted and build it back up again. Part of the problem is you have two often totally confilicting priorities. You want rule stability to keep people happy but you also need to adapt to changing trends and competition. Mod Prods was a very good example. It got increasingly modified (and potentially more expensive) which meant fewer people could do it. However the people that were left were split between wanting to keep things as is and wanting to change things further. The end result was whatever you did, half the people were going to be dissappointed. |
||
|
30 Nov 2007, 15:22 (Ref:2078764) | #9 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
|
I wonder if the people behind fast fords had changed. I've never had anything to do with them but you come across a lot of people in other series who raced with them at various times.
The idea of info finding it's way back to the organisers quicker than before may be the thing which changes this pattern of rise and decline. Last edited by hometune; 30 Nov 2007 at 15:25. |
||
|
30 Nov 2007, 21:01 (Ref:2078987) | #10 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9
|
too many series if you ask me,and more to the point too many series where the regs are so different so that racing in more than one series competitively is very difficult.
maybe if the series organisers had some way of having similar regs rather than one trying to keep cars away from another then maybe,just maybe drivers would be able to race in more than one series therefore having several healthy championships instead of 1 or 2 healthy and the rest struggling |
|
|
1 Dec 2007, 19:36 (Ref:2079489) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
I said so many times in the past that championships should draw their rules from the Blue Book.
Production Saloons, Modified Saloons, Special Saloons Production Sports, Modified Sports. One make saloons or sports can draw their regs from the Production rules. Makes it all simple. Simple to understand, simple to police, simple for people to jump from one series to another, etc... But that's too easy isn't it. Rob. |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
2 Dec 2007, 15:34 (Ref:2079940) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,297
|
Well Rob, that's what the BARC south east are trying to do; Tin tops (for production saloon cars on "road" tyres) DMN (modified saloons) and sports/saloons (for space frames, special saloons, modsports).
|
||
|
2 Dec 2007, 15:42 (Ref:2079945) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Ever thought about splitting the later two into a separate race Rod?
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
2 Dec 2007, 16:53 (Ref:2079963) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,071
|
its often disgussed, ultimately entry sizes are the deciding factor
|
||
__________________
AKA Guru its not speed thats dangerous, just the sudden lack of it! |
3 Dec 2007, 11:57 (Ref:2080555) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 597
|
Quote:
Did Barry Barnes ever run an Elan at Brands - I seem to remember an Elan running against the BMW works team at an international Brands race, and BMW getting all ****ty about it, as the elan was beating them - I believe they protested the thing and got it chucked out ( could be my memory playing tricks on me - ah pass me my carpet slippers ! ) Alan |
||
__________________
Before crticising another man, try first walking a mile in his shoes. Then when you do criticise him, you'll be a mile away, and you'll have his shoes! |
3 Dec 2007, 14:11 (Ref:2080665) | #16 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 235
|
A difficult area, is this. Series come and go, usually for two or three major reasons. Firstly, the manufacturer/vested interest behind it lose interest (Formula Vauxhall/Vauxhall Junior/F First/F Forward all spring to mind). Secondly, driving standards lead people to give up (Sports 2000?) and third, alternatives come along which "steal" the competitor base. None of these things is easy to fight. However, Sports 2000 is a glowing example of how to breathe new life into a moribund formula. Sports 2000 is now among the best supported series in UK motor sport, offers affordable cars with manageable running costs, and importantly, has a very strict driving standards policy. People have been excluded from races and even the series for ignoring this code of conduct. The result is 30+ grids over three major series (Duratec/Pinto/Historic) and races at the best circuits (Brands and S/S GP etc). I've been in it for the first time this year, and I don't regret the decision at all. See www.Sports2000-srcc.com if you're interested.....?
|
|
|
3 Dec 2007, 16:13 (Ref:2080736) | #17 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 300
|
I still miss Special Saloons. I know it has been stated many times, but there must be many sheeted over in lock-ups around the country doing nothing. There are regional championships around, but not supported as well as in the 70's. I still find it amazing that people still prefer to run modern chassis with Crossflow engines. Especially with the shortage of crossflow engines.
I agree with the suggestion of simplified rules, as has been done by BARC-SE and copied by CSCC. |
||
__________________
Life is more fun at 60 than when I was 18 ! Arrive at the great motor sport circuit in the sky with a big grin, shouting "that was fun! What's next?" |
3 Dec 2007, 18:33 (Ref:2080850) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I doubt there are many Flat Out if truth be known because the problem always is they are worth more broken than complete in most cases. I remember one of our guys trying for ages to sell a very hot Astra, gave up and advertised it for breaking and sold the lot and for quite a bit more. Thats the problem you have a car and it does not fit a certain criteria that someone may want to race in, chassis might be OK but engine or box could be wrong but they may suit another formula and it devalues it, there is a lot to be said for what Racing 59 stated earlier.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
4 Dec 2007, 12:31 (Ref:2081341) | #19 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 119
|
Last time I spoke to Lawrence Cutler, he still had his Midget, but was too busy with work to come out and play. I'll give him a wake up call some time this month to see what his plans are. It was good in the old days (cue wobbly voice), when we had simple saloon races, and sports car races. What killed them off was the usual story - some people went too far with the mods, and the rest got fed up with the expense of keeping up. A danger facing the currently successful DMN and LMA series. Whilst they continue with their excellent variety, this shouldn't happen though, as being fastest Thingi Mk 93 looks OK (even if you are 32nd on the grid).
|
|
|
6 Dec 2007, 22:29 (Ref:2083212) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,523
|
If you recall Tim, Super Road Saloons was a burgeoning series in the early 90's, and was wiped out by changes to the rules which "demonised" a large number of the cars that were series regulars. The classes were simple, the rules were simple, and it was very very popular.
Post 1997, the series collapsed, numbers fell from being able to run two oversubscribed races at each meeting, to grids of six or seven cars. It wasn't a case of spending more to keep up, it was "you can't run that here mate, off out of it" |
||
__________________
There is no substitute for cubic inches. Harry Belamonte - 403ci Vauxhall Belmont!! A 700hp wayward shopping trolley on steroids!! |
7 Dec 2007, 10:34 (Ref:2083482) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,686
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
7 Dec 2007, 13:20 (Ref:2083608) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I think it was also becoming harder to get competition cars through the MOT with emission testing and all, driving to and from the circuit was not really a good idea IMHO.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
7 Dec 2007, 20:01 (Ref:2083892) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,276
|
no al don't say that mr dodwell will be along shortly..
|
||
|
7 Dec 2007, 20:35 (Ref:2083914) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I know, me and Tim have discussed it several times at the track recently. He has a point in that it should have stopped guys pushing it the full 10/10ths either on the track or the engine tune but unfortunately thats all well and good in theory but when those lights turn to green..........
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
7 Dec 2007, 20:38 (Ref:2083917) | #25 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 25
|
Like some of you other old gits, I have seen the cycle of up/down and out many times. I cut my teeth in Modsports in the '70s - first with a Turner, then with an obscenely quick Midget, until I decided to try to emulate the Red Arrows at Croft and finished up in Darlington General. I then decided to build a car for the then fledgling Donington GT championship. My Mallock-based MG Midget was great for the first year, but thereafter Formula 2 cars fitted with a blowmoulding of a Skoda body et al appeared - and I was history. Donington tried to keep the series going by mandating a roof. Don't know if you've ever tried fitting gull-wing doors to Midget,but believe me, it wasn't easy. My car along,with many others, become less and less competitive (and also bl**dy awful to drive) until the series ceased to be.
Unfortunately, I tend to agree that this cycle is more or less unavoidable, as those who really want to win at all costs(quite literally) will, over a few seasons, cause any series to become less attractive, particularly to those of us who just race for fun - so the overall number of competitors reduces. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MSA decline some championship permits in 2008 | Mark Mitchell | Racers Forum | 68 | 16 Sep 2007 19:59 |
The decline of in car footage...... | Knowlesy | Formula One | 38 | 25 Nov 2006 18:01 |
jordans decline -designers | RWC | Formula One | 9 | 14 Mar 2004 23:17 |
Article on Button's steady decline | f1manoz | Formula One | 55 | 3 Aug 2001 16:19 |
[Magazines] Decline of motorsport journalism? | Gerard | Armchair Enthusiast | 13 | 23 Jul 2000 20:57 |