|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Jun 2004, 17:34 (Ref:1016824) | #1 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Safety Car usage with a crash on main straight?
Regarding the issue of whetehr the cars should've been taken down the pitlane durin ghte safety car perod at Indy, the excellent F1 Rejects website's race review offered this alternate view:
Quote:
If you want to merge this with ane xisting thread on the subejct, feel free |
|||
|
26 Jun 2004, 18:46 (Ref:1016872) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,035
|
Its an idea but if the track is bad enough to warrant using the pitlane shouldn't the red flag be shown....
|
||
__________________
le bad boy |
26 Jun 2004, 19:39 (Ref:1016902) | #3 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
It's very rare in F1 for this type of accident to happen on the main straight.
However, if the field were taken through the pit lane by the safety car, I don't see any problems. As soon as the SC is called for, most teams dived into the pits anyway, and this would be the same. At the point the safety car picks up the leader, everyone will form in a queue behind him anyway, so it'll be a whole lap later before the field is brought through the pitlane behind the SC. Pitting at that point would put you to the back of the queue - as it would now if you came in from behind the safety car. Most "quick stops" actually happen before everyone has caught the safety car - and this would be the same. |
|
|
26 Jun 2004, 19:56 (Ref:1016915) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 286
|
No problem to use the pit lane but they shouldn't be allowed to pit until the track is clean and can be used again
|
||
__________________
BMW+Williams+Montoya+Alonso=Dream Team! |
26 Jun 2004, 20:01 (Ref:1016917) | #5 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Why not?
|
|
|
27 Jun 2004, 09:39 (Ref:1017274) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 511
|
I think that they should have used the oitlane, but if not they should have at least made it mandetory for all cars to have the tires checked for debris. That would make sense.
|
||
__________________
Happiness is finding a bar of Dairy Milk Caramel in the fridge. |
27 Jun 2004, 10:59 (Ref:1017317) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
27 Jun 2004, 12:39 (Ref:1017413) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 511
|
Well, it seems like the only way would be to make them all pit about 5 laps after and have the tires changed. Simple. Well, actually not simple, nothing in this sport ever is!
|
||
__________________
Happiness is finding a bar of Dairy Milk Caramel in the fridge. |
27 Jun 2004, 13:09 (Ref:1017444) | #9 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
FerrariFanatic - it sounds like you're just complicating things.
Every team has the option to pit their car for new tyres. If they choose not to, then have a puncture, then they've only themselves to blame. |
|
|
27 Jun 2004, 23:31 (Ref:1018221) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 639
|
Quote:
The Grumpy1 |
||
|
28 Jun 2004, 16:35 (Ref:1019041) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,527
|
If you consider the race track to be too dangerous, Stop the race - simple.
|
||
__________________
There's an old F1 adage, 'If you want to finish first, first you have to be a duplicitous little moaning git' |
28 Jun 2004, 17:31 (Ref:1019107) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
I'd like to see them go back towards stopping the race, but the lap 1 crash was a far more important time to stop things, considering the amount of debris on the track. Using the safety car through the pitlane is a progressive diea that should be considered.
|
||
|
29 Jun 2004, 15:56 (Ref:1020240) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,244
|
I just wish they'd stop trying to continue the race at all costs for their TV and advertising backers, and consider the implications.
If they'd have thrown a red at Indy, chances are that the teams would've changed their tyres themselves as a precaution, problem solved! I thought they learnt their lesson from Australia 2001 and Monza 2000, when you had people seriously injuried on track, and they STILL kept the field out there, circulating, putting marshals and medics in danger and also making it harder for them to communicate through noise issues, and THEN the ambulance had to pull over and let the field through....crazy! A red after the start could've saved all that trouble...they DID do it at Hockenhiem 2001 after all. (Please no conspiracy theories about M.Schu being out of the race, I can see that one coming a mile off! ) |
||
__________________
We need to win like you need to breathe.... |
29 Jun 2004, 20:58 (Ref:1020659) | #14 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 380
|
They should have stopped the race on the first lap, they did it before why not in indy...
It is so cool to have a restart... BTW...They should ban pit-stop durring the first lap of a yellow flag like in others series. |
||
__________________
Beep Beep!!! IF you look in Your mirror it's allready too late , i just passed you... |
29 Jun 2004, 21:02 (Ref:1020670) | #15 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,182
|
I always thought it would be good to have a SC that starts half way around the lap. A problem at the first corner (or before the pit lane exit) means the race cars have to negotiate the accident before being brought under control of he SC.
Or red flag the race. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ba Tyre Wear/vy Hms Fuel Usage? | Grimace | Australasian Touring Cars. | 16 | 13 May 2005 06:24 |
Safety car usage (EuroBOSS) | redshoes | Marshals Forum | 62 | 13 Oct 2003 08:43 |
Crash barrier safety???? | calcium | Marshals Forum | 33 | 29 Apr 2003 20:53 |