|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
8 Feb 2005, 17:29 (Ref:1220602) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
Land Speed Records
do they count if the attempt is done on ice?
|
|
|
8 Feb 2005, 17:34 (Ref:1220605) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 871
|
Wouldn't that be a water speed record
|
||
|
8 Feb 2005, 17:49 (Ref:1220614) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
well thats what im asking! lol.
|
|
|
8 Feb 2005, 18:41 (Ref:1220666) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
Thirty five years ago, snomobile factories put big money into speed records, and at a site I saw a little while back, the first V-8 powered speed sled, built in ten years, will make an attempt this year. Bob |
|||
|
8 Feb 2005, 18:47 (Ref:1220672) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 601
|
is there anywhere long enough for a thrust ssc type attempts?
|
||
__________________
I love the deadlines. Especially the sound of them screaming by... |
8 Feb 2005, 19:40 (Ref:1220725) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
If you mean on ice, well, the surface would have to be smooth, and therefore, miles of ice would have to be graded (or a hoarde of Zambonis would have to prep. the ice ) plus there is a problem with pressure building underneath the ice (this causes trouble with cars and trucks going too fast on lake roads), and stopping would be strictly by parachute. Snowmobiles, use a short track mainly for reasons of cost of preparing a track on ice. It used to be a quarter mile but depending on where it is, some still run to 1,000 ft.(many are only 600 ft. now) and they still get going very fast. If there was big money in it, speeds and distances would increase dramtically. I did some freelance works at Winterfest, in Wisc. ten years ago(they had speed runs one day and drags the next) and asked what it would take to have both the speed runs and drags on longer tracks, and the person in charge said money. She said, you find some one to put up the money and we will build any length track you want. Bob PS-The last year I was there, the gent running in the unlimited speed class, who had the year before had a vehicle with a 500 in.cu. Arias Hemi, came back with the previously mentioned vehicle and another powered by a 500 in.cu. Arias DOHC V-8; such glorius sounds! Last edited by Bob Riebe; 8 Feb 2005 at 19:48. |
|||
|
9 Feb 2005, 22:27 (Ref:1221413) | #7 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
anyone know the official word on this? would the machine have to have wheels as well as blades/skates/things?
|
|
|
9 Feb 2005, 23:54 (Ref:1221494) | #8 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,206
|
LSR machines should have (at least?) four wheels. All of which much touch the ground for the entire measured distance IIRC.
Last edited by Adam43; 9 Feb 2005 at 23:56. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
10 Feb 2005, 00:06 (Ref:1221500) | #9 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,837
|
A comment
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced |
10 Feb 2005, 08:55 (Ref:1221712) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Feb 2005, 12:20 (Ref:1221894) | #11 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 98
|
Land speed record...
Now that everthing is jet driven... I've always wondered why they don't just use an F14.. fly it up to the measured mile.. at MACH2 say ? touch down just before... do the mile and lift off again.. do it the other direction... bingo ! Surely you just need special wheels that won't blowout ? I wonder how fast you can taxi a jet fighter anyway... ? I think it all went a bit meaningless after it stopped being wheel driven. Last edited by DaveStyles; 10 Feb 2005 at 12:20. |
||
|
10 Feb 2005, 13:01 (Ref:1221940) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 871
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
10 Feb 2005, 13:14 (Ref:1221962) | #13 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 392
|
Quote:
Or just take its wings off! |
|||
__________________
Lionel Hutz, attorney-at-law. What's that, a broken neck? Great! |
10 Feb 2005, 14:09 (Ref:1222003) | #14 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
already bin done. www.landspeed.com
|
|
|
10 Feb 2005, 19:07 (Ref:1222259) | #15 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 164
|
Henry Ford (THE Henry Ford) broke the LSR in January 1904 driving a Ford Arrow (what else) on ice over Lake St Clair near Detroit. His record was 91.37 MPH. Another ice LSR attempt is currently being planned. www.sonicwind.com
|
|
|
11 Feb 2005, 12:40 (Ref:1222909) | #16 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 98
|
I don't believe it...
it was my master plan, and they beat me to it ! grrr ! |
||
|
23 Feb 2005, 16:13 (Ref:1233631) | #17 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
so back to original question! is there any rule that says you have to run on a certain surface? and what the rule on wheels?
|
|
|
4 Mar 2005, 23:41 (Ref:1242757) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
I don't think there are any rules as to what surfaces you have to run on.
Ice might not be the best surface to run on, the wheels of any car would heat up quite a lot at mach 1, they'd probably melt the ice and start sinking into it slightly which would rapidly increase rolling friction. I remember reading this was a problem for the Thrust SSC team initially when they ran in the Black Rock desert, the surface was too soft. The official speed is the average of two runs through a timed section a mile long (the run up to that mile can be as long as you like however), where the runs are completed in opposite directions to negate the effect of winds and must also be completed within one hour of the first run. The cars have to have 4 wheels, and all 4 wheels must remain in contact with the road for the entirety of the measured mile. I don't think you could do it with an F14. If you tried to land a plane at those speeds the undercarriage would simply fail, nevermind the tyres which would probably also explode. They're both designed for use within specific limits, and LSR attempts aren't a consideration! Last edited by pirenzo; 4 Mar 2005 at 23:46. |
||
|
6 Mar 2005, 20:11 (Ref:1244871) | #19 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
|
On Thursday 4th February 1988, not far from the Artic Circle on the frozen lake Hornavan, near the village of Arjeplog, in North Sweden, a Renault 21 Turbo driven by Jean Pierre Malcher attains the World Speed record on Ice, reaching a top speed of 250.610 KPH/155 MPH using Michelin studded tyres.
http://www.renault21turbo.homestead....ce_record.html |
|
|
14 Mar 2005, 11:34 (Ref:1251496) | #20 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 248
|
so as long as the vehicle has four wheels in contact with the floor, its elidgable? i was think about the sonic wind concept. just have four tiny wheels somewhere (size of ball bearings or somethin) along with the blades which the thing would run on.
|
|
|
15 Mar 2005, 19:04 (Ref:1252743) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
yeah. But you have to remember that if the car bottoms out, you'll slow down, and also, the wheel tracks will diminish in size the smaller they are. They've got to be visible if you want to prove they were in contact the whole time...
LSR is quite interesting though. You have to think about all sorts of things which you wouldn't in a racing car. Such as rolling friction as I mentioned above. Most sorts of friction would be desirable in a car, as that is what the car grips on. If you're being forced along by a huge jet engine, you want the wheels to turn with as much ease as possible. I think Thrust SSC's wheels were akin to a train's... |
||
|
17 Mar 2005, 19:43 (Ref:1254493) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 8,298
|
Sonic wind has been in around for about 10 yeras now and is a rocket sled on ice basically.
hae always wondered ow ice rund can be allowed especiall wi the vehicle running on runners rather tan wheels. Afer all that is a whole area of engineering left nulland void. Anyone who knows te history here willknow that Arfons was gonna break Breedloves 600 run in the green Monster whe he put out a wheel bearing and and smashed te thing o smithereens so being able to not worry about designig wheels and stuff seems very unfair. And as for the whold thing being a bit pointless afe the wheels stopped being driven. Well I for oe can applaud the breaking of the sound arrier on land as one of the most amazing achievements of the last 20 years both in an emotional and engineering sense. Read Nobles ook and ten tell me it was all a bit pointless!! |
||
|
17 Mar 2005, 21:13 (Ref:1254578) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
Indeed, Arfons was lucky to escape with his life!
|
||
|
17 Mar 2005, 23:13 (Ref:1254681) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
At about 500mph the fellow found that he not only had a yellow stripe down his back but over his entire body. Arfons wanted to buy the car back, as he knew it could easily beat Noble's 633 mph, but the person he sold it to wanted millions for what he paid thousands for, so Arfons built the small car, but he knew that one was only good for about 650 mph, which with the speed both Breedlove and Green were hitting was not even worth the effort. Sad as I really would have liked to see what the Monster would do a BlackRock. Bob |
|||
|
7 Apr 2005, 09:18 (Ref:1272333) | #25 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 56
|
In danger of sounding like a nerd, a jet flying at Mach2 would be impossible to control precisley enough to touch down for the length of the test strip. And ejection is impossible above the speed of sound (not sure of the exact cutoff speed), the pilot would be torn apart by the air.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
another land speed record question | DanJR1 | Racing Technology | 4 | 15 Apr 2005 00:08 |
Land Speed Record costs? | DanJR1 | Racing Technology | 16 | 4 Feb 2004 14:54 |
World Land Speed Record Attempts | racer69 | Motorsport History | 15 | 9 Jan 2003 17:16 |