Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 Dec 2002, 01:10 (Ref:455860)   #1
FilW
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Devon
Posts: 155
FilW should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Corner Weights

I am not sure what is meant by corner weights. Is it the weight at each corner, ie the wheel, as the name suggests or is it something far more sinister? What is the significance of corner weights, how do you measure them and adjust them etc.........Sorry if I sound a bit dense!
FilW is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2002, 01:22 (Ref:455864)   #2
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It is as you suspected the weight of each individual corner and is a very important part of the handleing of the car from these you can find, front/rear bias,side to side bias(partically on ovals) you use it as the basic start point for weight transfer.
It can be adjusted by a variety of means but most common are either physically moving weight in the car items such as batteries,fire bombs,driver,fuel cell etc or by adjusting the hieghts of the spring platforms bu packers under the spring or adjustable spring seats.
You need either a set of scales(longacre etc) if scales are unavailable you can use a public weigh bridge and some time but I would be suspect as to the accuracy of this method
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 23 Dec 2002, 01:53 (Ref:455873)   #3
ultimatebilly
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4
ultimatebilly should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The total weight of the car is dispersed between the corners. The weight is measured from the bottom of the tyre because that is what is touching the ground. the aim is to get the wiehgt accros the car the same. ie. the front left the same as the front right. and the same goes for the rear, although obviously it will be a higher value at the rear if its a rear engined single seater.

When a driver gets better it is posible to bias the weights so that as he/she brakes into a corner the front right (if its a right hand corner he/she is braking into) will remain a little heavier and avoid locking the wheel.

the way most people do it with a push rod car is to pretty much leave the front pushrods alone (assuming the chassis is level) and just to lengthen the rears or shorten them to adjust the corner weights.

so

say the front left is too heavy and the chassis is level or as level as your going to get it, you want to shorten the right rear to take weight away from the front left. Its an idea not to do all the adjustment on one corner at the back, try and do it in equal measures on both sides so as to minimise the adjustment on each corner.

hope this makes sence

Billy
ultimatebilly is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Dec 2002, 01:01 (Ref:458557)   #4
boyracer
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location:
western australia
Posts: 153
boyracer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
As I understand, diagonal weights matching is more important than left/right, as weight moves diagonal across the car. ie left rear to right front ( left hand corner)
boyracer is offline  
__________________
Happiness is seeing the race ....... in your rear view mirror
Quote
Old 28 Dec 2002, 02:49 (Ref:458596)   #5
Warwick
Racer
 
Warwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
New Zealand
New Zealand
Posts: 441
Warwick should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dont think so,as that would screw up your braking for a start if RF and LF weighed different,we always set front the same and rear the same.
Warwick is offline  
__________________
Eat right,
Stay Fit,
Die anyway!
Quote
Old 29 Dec 2002, 21:37 (Ref:459750)   #6
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
On oval and to an extent the "cross weight" is very important at a cars performance will change a lot by going from say 50.5% to 49.7% not as big a deal on road course,and naturaly measured with the driver and fuel in the car.
If you have identical LF & RF and the same at the back you will infact have 50.0% cross weight.Try changing it to a bit heaveir RF ,LR and see the change.
NASCAR do it by the adjusters in the rear window and CART cars have a driver adjustable system,you wouldn't think a that such systems would be in place for nothing now would you?.It does work and can be checked by turning on just two scales at the display and seeing the percentage.
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 30 Dec 2002, 05:05 (Ref:459913)   #7
Jukebox
Veteran
 
Jukebox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Malaysia
KL
Posts: 2,212
Jukebox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Onlooker
On oval and to an extent the "cross weight" is very important at a cars performance will change a lot by going from say 50.5% to 49.7%
When you mentioned this, what pops in my mind would have something to do with the camber positions that contributes quite considerably to the weight of each sides.

Try to view this discussion thread
Jukebox is offline  
__________________
more hors3epower
Quote
Old 30 Dec 2002, 09:30 (Ref:459975)   #8
JR Ewing
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,537
JR Ewing should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by boyracer
As I understand, diagonal weights matching is more important than left/right, as weight moves diagonal across the car. ie left rear to right front ( left hand corner)
Nope, you adjust diagonally. For example, if your right front is 'light' you may lengthen the left rear w/bone to push more weight down here and on the right front. This will also lighten the left front a touch. There are other ways of adjusting it as well but, on simple cars at least, this si the most common.
JR Ewing is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jan 2003, 19:55 (Ref:462249)   #9
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Errr, hope you mean 'pushrod' as opposed to w/bone there JR... as stated, you would be creating quite a mess of problems...
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 3 Jan 2003, 04:25 (Ref:462486)   #10
boyracer
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location:
western australia
Posts: 153
boyracer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So when setting corner weights, of course you aim for as close as possible, but for tin lidded race cars there are many factors working against you. So what is an acceptable tolerance 3kgs 5 or maybe 10 ??
boyracer is offline  
__________________
Happiness is seeing the race ....... in your rear view mirror
Quote
Old 4 Jan 2003, 12:53 (Ref:463504)   #11
FilW
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Devon
Posts: 155
FilW should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks for all your help guys!?!
It makes a bit more sense now, next thing is to try it on the car!
I'm sure I'll be back for more advice.
FilW is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jan 2003, 22:53 (Ref:464864)   #12
verglas
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
Warwickshire, England
Posts: 271
verglas should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
just another nugget of advice.. don't forget to include yourself in the calculations, and either sit in the car when adjusting, or put bags of weight where you would be sitting. Especially important when checking ride height, which is another can of worms!!
verglas is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jan 2003, 04:46 (Ref:467015)   #13
Jumbo240z
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1
Jumbo240z should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Some info...

http://www.grmotorsports.com/cornerweight.html
Jumbo240z is offline  
__________________
Beginning Racer... but having a blast!
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 10:21 (Ref:474885)   #14
racealign
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
melbourne, australia
Posts: 41
racealign should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
just out of interst, how may of you guys have actually done corner weighing and adjustment on your own cars???
racealign is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 19:10 (Ref:475436)   #15
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've done it with a Kart and a Formula car, and helped do it with a stock car as well.
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 15 Jan 2003, 23:19 (Ref:475743)   #16
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I have plenty of times on about 6-7 different class of cars and for both oval and flat track over a 15 year period.
The theory is always the same just the numbers change
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 16 Jan 2003, 02:00 (Ref:475838)   #17
Red Dog
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Poole, Dorset, UK
Posts: 207
Red Dog should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And did you guys drive the cars before and afterwards?

I set my car up badly end of last season and it was driveable in the dry. But when I went to qualify at the next meeting at Snetterton it was cold and wet. I lost it very badly under braking for Russell and I could not work out what was wrong. Brakes locking front then rear.....five spins that day......oh dear, oh dear, much embarassment! I went to set it it up for the next season with a new set of four bathroom scales (it's not a heavy car) and bingo....the left front and right rear were light. Having got the figures to within 3 kgs the car's handling was transformed.
NOTE: if using bathroom scales they need to be cross checked with each other. They are consistent in themselves (test by weighing yourself ten times in a row) but the next set of scales will make you a different weight, so you have to allow for the differences when weighing the car. They were very cheap ones - £4.95 each!! I expect Longacre scales are a bit better.....
And very importantly the tops of the scales must all be level with each other and the car must be in ready to race condition with driver in full kit etc, tyres at normal pressure and all suspension angles set, and anti roll bars disconnected. Record everything you do so that you can revert if it all feels wrong on track.
Red Dog is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jan 2003, 21:25 (Ref:476613)   #18
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I have run into all of the things Red Dog talked about... very good points!
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 17 Jan 2003, 04:43 (Ref:476869)   #19
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No driving for me Red dog ( you can always find a driver with $$$$)
PS Do you set it up before every week end? There must have been a reason for the change in handling from dry to wet apart from the cross weight.
True as you say level the scales,calibrat and weigh it as you would race it.
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 17 Jan 2003, 16:32 (Ref:477420)   #20
THR
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
United Kingdom
Wolverhampton, England
Posts: 727
THR has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
we set it all up b4 every event... makes a lot of difference.. and eliminates the "ohh i wonder if the corner wieghts are right" varible at the track!!
THR is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jan 2003, 02:29 (Ref:487011)   #21
RWC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Qld.-australia
Posts: 2,083
RWC should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
"There must have been a reason for the change in handling from dry to wet apart from the cross weight"
That car is more sensitive to that aspect of setup in the wet
RWC is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2003, 06:12 (Ref:488030)   #22
Onlooker
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location:
Smoko
Posts: 1,994
Onlooker should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
My point was simply that is you had corect corner weights at both rounds then the problem is else where ie Dry Camber settings or hard spring/anti roll bar combination.Perhaps to get the speed in the wet you must adjust the shocks a certain way and that is no good in the wet?
Just food for thought.
Onlooker is offline  
__________________
Succes is a result of judgment,that is inturn a result of experience that has come from instances of bad judgment.

"Montoya made some last minute changes to his suspension but it seemed to effect it's handling"-Classic
Quote
Old 30 Jan 2003, 01:48 (Ref:490105)   #23
Red Dog
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Poole, Dorset, UK
Posts: 207
Red Dog should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Set up was the same for the two rounds but unchecked in between, and definitely wrong! The first track was dry (almost) and grippy. The second track was very, very slippery and cold. As RWC said, it was just a lot more sensitive. I now check the weights more frequently and carefully. Next thing I would like to try is some really sensitive double adjustable dampers....perhaps there might be some in a skip outside the old Penske place in Poole.....?
Red Dog is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Feb 2003, 23:26 (Ref:505964)   #24
FilW
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Devon
Posts: 155
FilW should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
When setting corner weights the book I've been reading, and Red Dog's earlier post, said to disconnect the anti roll bar before hand but won't the settings be altered again by reattaching it after?
FilW is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Feb 2003, 00:15 (Ref:506000)   #25
ultimatebilly
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4
ultimatebilly should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The roll bars should have Rose joints either end that you can adjust to make sure there is no Pre-load when they are reatatched.

Also if the dampers are adjustable make sure they are all backed off in adjustment to avoid them sticking down and confusing you as you jump on it between adjustments!

Billy
ultimatebilly is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTCC Car Weights Fechna Touring Car Racing 7 26 Aug 2005 21:40
Official weights LM 2004 vandijk Sportscar & GT Racing 13 9 Jun 2004 13:39
Weights in the British Rally X Series M.Lowe Rallying & Rallycross 2 25 Apr 2004 14:01
Weights distribution Alino Racing Technology 4 4 Sep 2002 03:06
Some weights... Fab Sportscar & GT Racing 6 17 Jun 2002 16:54


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.