|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 13:04 (Ref:1706685)
|
#1 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
 |
Releasing cars from pits into the path of other cars...
There used to be a time when it was a cardinal sin to release a car from a pit box into the path of another car already underway down pit lane.
What has happened to this rule as it seems now that teams release cars when they feel like it and rely upon the car already underway to take evasive action to avoid a collision. The cars then trundle down pitlane side by side. Is this right and "safe"? |
||
|
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 13:06 (Ref:1706697)
|
#2 | |
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
 |
Don't really see a problem with it. They know what they are doing.
If it was done in the old Monaco pit or something, it'd be a bit daft. |
|
|
|
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 13:12 (Ref:1706710)
|
#3 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Yeah, but the point is that it used to be a punishable offense, you could not release a car into the path of another, yet now is "seemingly ok" to do, was there a rule change?
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 13:14 (Ref:1706714)
|
#4 | |
|
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I'm not really sure on it. It is an interesting one.
I think the problem has been releasing cars directly into the path of another car. Like with Barrichello and DC at Imola 2000. Now they are released to run side by side. One to research after the race I think! |
|
|
|
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 13:48 (Ref:1706777)
|
#5 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,387
|
Well here in Australia, if you release your car into the path of another and the driver already in the fast lane has to take diversive action, you'll recieve a drive through. Simple as that. It's too dangerous, I remember seeing two V8 driver racing each other at 40 km/h in the pit lane, side by side...
|
||
|
|
__________________
"A lot of people go through life doing things badly. Racing’s important to men who do it well. When you’re racing, it... it’s life. Anything that happens before or after... is just waiting." - Steve McQueen
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 14:06 (Ref:1706806)
|
#6 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
The Kubica / Alonso one could have been dangerous, but both drivers were alert to the situation. I'm not sure if there is an official rule change on this - if not, Robert could feasibly get a time penalty added on for the team's infringement. If Massa had finished one place behind him, he definitely would have.
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 Sep 2006, 15:20 (Ref:1706937)
|
#7 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
If there were two lane pitlanes like in most Champ Car venues, there'd be no problems...
|
||
|
|
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| wish list of cars to be made to gt1 cars | slicktsax | Sportscar & GT Racing | 24 | 6 Oct 2005 09:02 |
| GP 2 cars are approximately 3 secs faster than the F3000 cars | Frank_White | National & International Single Seaters | 18 | 5 Nov 2004 23:06 |
| IMSA GTP cars should have been 2,000+ horsepower cars | Green Monster | North American Racing | 29 | 17 Jun 2004 01:20 |
| F1 Safety Cars / Medical Cars | Mark Stevens | Formula One | 8 | 21 May 2004 18:10 |
| 2003 Touring cars - what predictions for teams and cars (and colours!!) | adamp_uk | Touring Car Racing | 16 | 17 Oct 2002 20:12 |
Linear Mode
