|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
21 Jan 2006, 06:58 (Ref:1505734) | #1 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,573
|
Historic Racing
This is prompted by a discussion a few of us had recently.
Really what constitutes an historic race (in terms of age and type of machinery) and when did “historic” racing start? As many know I race a Capri. It’s a Mark 3 and was built by Ford in 1978 so its now 28 years old. We race in the “Classic” Group 1 Championship and of course the Top Hat 70’s Saloons. But I understand other’s viewpoint that it is not an “historic” car in terms of age yet it is eligible to run in historic race meetings. So can the car qualify as a Historic-racing car? And when did we decide that club racing was really “Historic” racing (the TRC championship is perhaps the one true “modern” club racing championship in terms of machinery and regulations). That is a growing perception among many including me. My point being that clubs like the MG Car Club ran meetings catering solely for MG for many years, it was club racing in its purest sense but of course the cars were getting older until eventually there was nothing less than 15 years old racing on the bill. Whilst that club now includes MGF’s, Rs etc. it can still class its meetings as “historic” race meetings. So thoughts anybody? |
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
21 Jan 2006, 09:29 (Ref:1505787) | #2 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Well, the VSCC have been in 'historic' racing for years, and I seem to remember that the Griffith formula races for 1950's sports cars started in the late 60's (I think!). I am not aware of a particular point that we have identified in time when an old racing car becomes 'historic'. However, if I see a grid full of Capris, Dollies, 2002's, Rover 3500's, XJS etc, then I'm reminded of the past; it must therefore be historic. And, is not a Porsche 962, a historic racing car, even though it is from the 80's? Certainly, those races now held, recalling the Group C/GTP period are every bit as nostalgic for some as the GT cars of the 60's or sports cars of the 50's that we see at Goodwood, for example. They are all nostalgic for me as each represents a period of motor racing in my past. They all attempt to recall 'history'; ergo they are a form of 'historic' racing.
It does, of course, become harder to decide when you have a 'spread' of cars as described by Peter, above, but if a grid is predominantly composed of cars built (say) over 15 years ago, is it not, in general, representing the past? |
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 10:30 (Ref:1505816) | #3 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,840
|
I remember watching what was listed as a 'historic single seater' race at Snetterton in 1969. Neil Corner won if I remember correctly in a 250F and I also remember a Lotus 16. What I do distinctly remember about it was Morley's 24 litre Bentley being started on the grid. The mechanic had a sack barrow full of batteries which they plugged in to get her going. It started from the back and was up to 2nd by the hairpin, but then came the time to use the brakes which put the old girl back down the order again!
The 250F for example was only 12 years old or so at the time, they were considered historic then so no worries on the Capri Peter! So would a 1993 Damon Hill Williams or whatever be deemed historic now? Perhaps the term Historic racing should be renamed by all clubs and associations as 'Historic and Classic' Racing. Afterall, two of the biggest historic (and classic) meetings now are called the Silverstone and the Le Mans Classics. |
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 10:46 (Ref:1505830) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,968
|
As Peter says, there are relatively few contemporary racing championships - although in terms of tin-tops there is certainly more than just the TRC championship that fits this particular bill. It is only natural, too, that as time goes on more and more cars are built, and my definition more and more 'old' cars will be knocking around. In motorsport there may be good reasons for this - modern road cars tend to be a bit bigger and heavier and less suited to racing maybe, so people stick with older models. Older cars are probably easier to fiddle with, too.
I don't think the terms 'Historic' or 'Classic' racing should necessarily be purely determined by age, either. It would be more appropriate surely to define a car in such a way if it was considered a classic car, or an historic one for some motoring, or motorsport, reason - because of a technical leap it made, or particular success on the race track. |
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 12:04 (Ref:1505911) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
30 Year Rule?
I was under the impression that it was a rolling 30 years. So in 2006 it would anything Pre 1976 that would be 'historic'.
With Veteran and Vintage being clearly defined I suspect it is about time that additional eras were named and standardised. So with terms like Classic and Historic you could easily fill the gap from 1945 to 1975. However as motorsport expanded rapidly in the postwar years each of the new deined eras would have to have multiple classes e.g. F1, F2, F5000, FF1600 etc. I would have thought the HSCC would be the ideal body to set the standards. |
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 12:09 (Ref:1505917) | #6 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
21 Jan 2006, 12:17 (Ref:1505932) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,968
|
I wasn't suggesting that the nomenclature be strictly applied to include or exclude cars from competition... It is more the fact that there are some cars that I would find it difficult to call 'historic' or 'classic'. Take Renault 5s that race in CTCRC. Yes, there was a thriving championship for those cars from the 1970s onwards - but to me they aren't historic or classic, just old. Perhaps there is a need for a more general term - 'old car racing'!
|
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 12:27 (Ref:1505946) | #8 | ||
The Scarlet Pimpernel
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,274
|
Old car racing- anything over 25 years ,cheap to expensive
|
||
__________________
john ruston |
21 Jan 2006, 13:06 (Ref:1506002) | #9 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
There are two debates here really aren't there? Firstly, there is the one around classification of certain periods, and/or racing cars, described as Veteran, Vintage, PVT, Classic, Historic or, just 'Old' as referred to by Ian and John. On the other hand, there is the all embracing term 'historic' racing which is the one I'm struggling with. It covers all the above classifications, but where to draw the line? Strictly speaking, last year's F1 cars are part of history, but not yet 'historic'. I rather like John's simple definition, although would probably argue for 15 years rather than 25. Afterall, the GroupC/GTP race series is definitely a 'historic' series.
|
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 13:16 (Ref:1506014) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Quote:
My Formula Ford is described as a Classic (It's 26 years old) but could be raced not only in the Classic Championship but with the current cars as well. (Well it would if I had the money) |
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
21 Jan 2006, 13:53 (Ref:1506045) | #11 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,840
|
The Germans have the simple answer - they call everything 'oldtimer'.
|
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 13:58 (Ref:1506047) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
21 Jan 2006, 13:58 (Ref:1506048) | #13 | ||||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
21 Jan 2006, 14:01 (Ref:1506051) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
21 Jan 2006, 14:03 (Ref:1506052) | #15 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Does 'oldtimer' convey the right message, though? Does Lola T400, BMW 635CSI or Jaguar XJR14 fit that description?
Alan, I agree with the 'fun' bit, but I think we need to have headings of some sort, so that we can identify what we are addressing - just take a look at all the forums on 10-Tenths? Last edited by John Turner; 22 Jan 2006 at 09:43. Reason: an 'are' too many! |
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 18:39 (Ref:1506181) | #16 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 3,797
|
As an aside to this debate, I was browsing through some editions of Thoroughbred and Classic Cars magazine today. Dating from 1975 they were cheerily reporting on the CSCC's fledgling saloon series which was allowing cars of pre-1957 design. Meanwhile the magazine was sponsoring a sports car series which allowed Cobras, Elva Mk7s and Ferrari GTOs. Some of these would have been but a decade old at the time.
And yes, the letters page was getting very animated with the debate over whether a Ford Zodiac or an MG Magnette could ever be classified as a classic car! |
||
|
21 Jan 2006, 18:46 (Ref:1506185) | #17 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
21 Jan 2006, 20:04 (Ref:1506231) | #18 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 410
|
UK Historic rallying uses 3 categories. These used to be called (and still are by some) Historic, Post Historic and Classic but are now offficially Historic 1, 2 and 3. It is more than coincidence that the cut off date of 31.12.67. keeps all Escorts out of the first category and the date of 31.12.74. keeps Mk2 Escorts out of the second category too. The final cut off date of 31.12.81. is the end of the previous FIA Appendix J (that preceded Groups N, A and B). The new categories of 1, 2, 3, make it simpler to add further ones as time moves on.
Historic racing is somewhat more complicated and needs to go back a lot earlier but might benefit from a more widely recognised standardised period split? |
|
|
21 Jan 2006, 20:23 (Ref:1506233) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
I understand the view that a Renault 5 is hard to construe as a 'Classic' or infact any Hatch back (maybe this is the cut off point, when they introduced front wheel drive hatchbacks and/or cpu's). However the mid engined Renault 5's I would definitely call classic. So therfore I think it is (or should be) as much the model of car than the actual age. Take my old pre-73 Camaro, it seems to please a lot of people trackside and I would classify that as a classic, powerful two door coupe that looks sharp and makes all the right noises, a model with a lot of racing history but if you took say a Chevrolet Caprice saloon from the same period and as old I would say old tub and definite at least not in motorsport circles, NOT a Classic. Same as Pete's Capri or a Ford RS2000 Mk1 or 2, a classic undoubtedly, Mk 3 or 4 Cortina same year, old tub.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
21 Jan 2006, 21:28 (Ref:1506276) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,820
|
Quote:
with ref to another thread, I suspect many of the folk that love to knock the BB have never read it... |
|||
__________________
a salary slave no more... |
22 Jan 2006, 00:11 (Ref:1506356) | #21 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 28
|
Its worth remembering how the categories came into being: Vintage was coined by the VSCC in 1933 to apply to cars prior to Dec 31 1931 because there was perceived to be a difference in cars after that date. The same can be said of Historics; After about 1960 all racing cars became rear engined. Thus, although a 250F was only 12 years old in the late sixties it was an anachronism. Thats what we should call it! Anachronistic Racing!!
|
||
__________________
"Memory is not an infallible tool", I can't remember who said that.... |
22 Jan 2006, 10:29 (Ref:1506509) | #22 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 410
|
Quote:
|
||
|
23 Jan 2006, 10:20 (Ref:1507144) | #23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,718
|
its difficult as some cars of similar ages are most definitely not, take early 70's, Capri, Escort etc . . .classic cars in every sense . . . Allegros and Marinas on the other hand, just aren't ( although there are some Quantity surveyors out there who consider them desirable )
generally 25 years old is getting on for classic status I think as for old timer . . .is that referring to the cars or the owners/drivers ? |
|
|
23 Jan 2006, 19:20 (Ref:1507537) | #24 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 238
|
My escort was built 36 years ago and is still the same today as it was then, but because it had a rover engine fitted and raced in special saloons it is neither regarded as historic or classic and has to race against modern cars or not at all !!!!!
|
||
|
23 Jan 2006, 20:11 (Ref:1507582) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,699
|
Peter maybe some of you guys with these old cars could form a Historic Special Saloon registry and try to get a couple of meetings going. From what I have seen here there will be a lot of spectator interest at least.
|
||
__________________
You can't polish a turd but you sure can sprinkle it with glitter! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historic Racing | Crash and Burn | Cool Sites | 1 | 23 Dec 2001 11:11 |