|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Jan 2014, 02:39 (Ref:3356919) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
|
V8 COTF Chassis - who has a new one?
I was just wondering if anyone knows who will be running a new chassis this year, and who will be using last years?
At this stage now, you would thing most teams would want at least 1 spare. My Guesses - (could be wrong, please correct me if so) GRM - 2 new due to change in manufacturer 888 - 1 new for Lowndes, Whincup to use last year's Bathurst car. I haven't heard about anyone else building new cars, although I imagine HRT will have to build at least 2 due to the team expanding in size and to replace the car totaled at Eastern Creek. |
||
__________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions? |
22 Jan 2014, 02:57 (Ref:3356924) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
|
Quote:
Also i read that Nissan was in the process of building there spare car. I also think FPR were doing the same thing... |
||
|
22 Jan 2014, 03:14 (Ref:3356926) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
The major difference they found was accommodating the engine (plus other smaller things like pick-up points etc). So in theory they could adapt the 2013 cars for 2014. |
|||
|
22 Jan 2014, 04:23 (Ref:3356936) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,117
|
|||
|
22 Jan 2014, 04:24 (Ref:3356938) | #5 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,511
|
That seemed to be the original plan, although it seems it may not have occurred/be necessary, with what is said to be a brand new chassis for Mr Slade, and presumably another for Mr Tander unlocking both a 4th car and a spare for that squad...
|
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
22 Jan 2014, 04:25 (Ref:3356939) | #6 | |||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,511
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
22 Jan 2014, 06:23 (Ref:3356949) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
|
|||
__________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions? |
22 Jan 2014, 07:26 (Ref:3356955) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
BJR cars were in pieces just recently, receiving a raft of updates.
SBR Falcon is apparently the spare chassis and apparently a ways behind in development, but given the JRR REC shift, theyll have a compelete Mercedes spare. |
|
|
23 Jan 2014, 03:09 (Ref:3357258) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
|
Erebus also have a new car being built as well...
|
|
|
23 Jan 2014, 05:44 (Ref:3357272) | #10 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,511
|
|||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
23 Jan 2014, 21:40 (Ref:3357637) | #11 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 242
|
From Speedcafe:
http://www.speedcafe.com/2014/01/24/...n-restructure/ WR016 for Slade WR018 ex. D'Alberto for Percat WR019 continues with Tander WR020 debuted by Percat in Sydney will be Courtney's car WR021 & WR022 under construction as team spares |
||
__________________
Very Very stupid indeed!! |
24 Jan 2014, 11:04 (Ref:3357904) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,193
|
Whats the goss on when COFT can creep into develop series, considering in two years time we say goodbye to Commy and Falc ?
We know the cost as teams come and go in the Dev series , will this be a burden again or wil the dev series go like some years back to a small field? Couldnt they allow a few mods to the last of the cars, pr coft , to extend the life? No use having a series if the cost will retard the racing. |
||
|
25 Jan 2014, 00:03 (Ref:3358288) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
One point of interest will be whether teams need to upgrade chassis' as often. If - as the theory goes - the chassis themselves are fairly universal - then when it comes time to upgrade from model to model, they can simply slap on new bodywork and keep racing the same chassis. That could seriously damage the re-sale market for V8 series machines. Of course some will buy new machines regardless, because newer will be fresher and better, but for some of the second-tier DVS teams, they may just life their cars longer. Probably won't know for another 6-8 years though. And who knows what else will have changed in that time. |
|||
|
25 Jan 2014, 00:52 (Ref:3358300) | #14 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,511
|
The question then might be is if a chassis is logbooked as a Volvo for example, whether the owner was allowed to change to Mercedes bodywork, aero & engine
|
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… #CANCERSUCKS #GOCHIKO Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! |
25 Jan 2014, 00:58 (Ref:3358301) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
I'd say they're just log-booked as the chassis number (detirmined by the cage constructor) for this very reason.
|
|
|
27 Jan 2014, 04:06 (Ref:3360341) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
Although my point was more around upgrading from (for example) a 2015 Commodore to a 2017 using the same chassis and different panels. I think with the subtle (and in the case of the Merc - not so subtle) differences in chassis between manufacturers that it might be more trouble than it's worth to try and change between manufacturers. |
|||
|
27 Jan 2014, 07:15 (Ref:3360382) | #17 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 372
|
Are DJR building up the spare they had or just jigging the old #12 back to glory?
|
|
|
27 Jan 2014, 10:15 (Ref:3360430) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,193
|
|||
|
27 Jan 2014, 21:59 (Ref:3360757) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
In addition - having a spare car also means having an extra set of spares. Because you need the spares handy without having to rip them back off a race car. Plus they can almost always repair existing cars between rounds (back-to-back flyaways are rare). They'll always have a spare shell (in various stages of build) at the workshop (or be able to access one) so that if the race car is a write off then they can just build up the new one. The exception is Triple 8 - they're contractually obligated with both Vodafone and now Red Bull to have a fully-built spare ready to go. This way there is no chance that they will miss a round. |
|||
|
28 Jan 2014, 12:06 (Ref:3361036) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 590
|
||
|
28 Jan 2014, 21:44 (Ref:3361280) | #21 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 242
|
It is my understanding that the SBR Falcon Chassis was labelled SBR COTF 22 as the 22nd chassis they have constructed.
In 2013, The chassis were: Car 4, Holdsworth SBR24-EM02-2012 Car 9, Engel SBR23-EM01-2012 Car 47, Slade SBR25-EM03-2012 With the carry on numbering for SBR, the EM for Erebus Motorsport and the year of construction. Source of information V8 Sleuth. As for 2014, I do not know who is in what chassis. They are all the same age. Maybe Holdsworth keeps his and Davision takes over the chassis that Engel used. As for the original FG COTF, maybe it can be updated and converted to a Mercedes and dubbed SBR22-EM00-2012??? It might be leased/sold off to a Dunlop Series team with view of entering it as a wildcard for Sandown/Bathurst in 2014 & 2015 and then used in the Development Series in 2016 when they are eligible. I am sure Matt Stone Racing would have a close eye on it. |
||
__________________
Very Very stupid indeed!! |
28 Jan 2014, 22:06 (Ref:3361300) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
|
Yes but the modifications required to convert it to a Merc from a Falcon were significant, especially the front-end modifications to accommodate the engine.
It's possible - my point is that the amount of extra work required would mean it's far more cost and time efficient to simply buy a second-hand version of whatever make of car you intend to run. |
||
|
29 Jan 2014, 22:08 (Ref:3361854) | #23 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
Anyway it appears I was close with the Erebus chassis for 2014: http://www.speedcafe.com/2014/01/30/...8-development/ |
|||
__________________
Very Very stupid indeed!! |
29 Jan 2014, 23:28 (Ref:3361897) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,200
|
Quote:
Except maybe for GRM - nobody else has tried to convert from one manufacturer to another, so there's no other known comparison to make. Again - my point is that any car CAN be converted to a different manufacturer's, but the effort and cost required means it's not going to be the preferred solution. |
|||
|
30 Jan 2014, 10:22 (Ref:3362020) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
As I understand it, packaging is the very reason GRM have opted to build two new Volvo-specific chassis. I would suspect that the existing Holdens will be modified over the course of the season to act as spares.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More V8 Supercar Chassis Histories | anthony81901 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 39 | 9 May 2013 00:50 |
Age of Current V8 Supercar Chassis | Gaz170 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 14 | 9 Apr 2012 12:11 |
V8 Supercar Chassis Histories | Noonz1 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 181 | 18 Jun 2010 10:22 |
2005 V8 Supercar Chassis | anthony81901 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 5 | 4 Mar 2005 12:25 |