|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
13 Jun 2001, 02:23 (Ref:104588) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 963
|
Pros and cons of your car (Pt. 2)
Yes, I know I did this thread some months ago in the gravel trap but now that we have this excellent Road car forum I figured that re posting it perhaps isn't a bad idea.
So, simple questions. What car do you have, what do you love about it and what do you hate about it. For me: I have a 1996 Peugeot 205 GRi (55000 Kms) Pros: - Terrific fuel economy. Sometimes I forget to fill it abou (about once every 2 weeks) but I just need some change to buy enough gas to get me trough the day. - Good performance for a 1.1L engine. - Small size means that it's very easy to park which is a good thing because most parking lots at the uni have very small places to park. - For some strange reason peugeot has a status similar to that of BMW or Merc over here (dunno why though). Well, maybe not that much nowadays but it still has a lot of status.....well above brands such as renault, Mazda, chevrolet.... -Visits to the mechanic are very rare and when they have to be made it's usually for minor things. -The ride is very smooth and both the steering and gearbox have are very soft. -The car looks so nice when it's clean.... - That CD stereo sounds soooooo nice. It really makes every traffic jam wothwhile. Cons - I think that when the designers designed the driving position they only had in mind small or medium size people. I'm relatively tall and the back of the seat is too short and my legs always end up touching the steering wheel even when I move the seat all the way to the back. - The cabin loses it's adjustment with time and it starts making a lot of noises, in particular over irregular terrains. However it just takes a re-adjustment to fix that. - Spare parts are by no means cheap. - It gets dirty very easily. Dark colors look so nice when they're clean but i haven't been able to keep the car clean for more than a week and if more than two weeks without a visit to the car wash and people will start looking at you with disgust. - Gap between first and second gear is too big. So, how about you guys?? BTW, no replies will teach me the lesson that sequels are never good |
||
|
13 Jun 2001, 02:41 (Ref:104595) | #2 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Hmmm, interesting topic Sharky
1998 Subaru WRX Pro's
Con's
|
||
|
14 Jun 2001, 13:12 (Ref:105120) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,058
|
2000 Nissan Pulsar SSS
Pros: - Very sweet engine. - Handles predictabely, if not quite the best around - Yokohama A539 front tyres - build quality - good exhaust note - cheaper than expected to insure - excellent fuel economy on the open road Cons: - original Dunlop Performa tyres (lasted only 12,500km) - fuel economy on premium unleaded (still not sure why) - not exactly a new design anymore - gaping hole in passenger door where the door lock used to be. |
||
|
14 Jun 2001, 13:57 (Ref:105137) | #4 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
14 Jun 2001, 23:34 (Ref:105324) | #5 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 67
|
Well, it's 1984 Fiat 126p...
Pros: 1. very cheap (£100) 2. fun to drive (twitchy) 3. very short wheelbase (1.86m)- great to drive in rain 4. engine where it should be (rear) 5. RWD 6. air-cooled engine 7. drum brakes (make you go spin-spin when applied in corner) 8. engine so loud that one doesn't need a radio 9. excellent seating position (one can get very far away from steering wheel and drive in almost reclining position with arms almost stretched out) 10. very cheap spare parts 11. good for chrash-course in mechanics (something that each owner *should* be familiar with) 12. because of it's size (3.11x1.38x1.33m) can be parked virtually anywhere 13. makes you go through corners as fast as possible, just to avoid the ordeal of accelerating (see cons 6.) 14. much younger than my previous '74 same make/model (bought and sold for, surprise-surprise, £100) Cons: 1. needs lot of care 2. Hardy-joints seem to break very oft 3. not a lot of space in the back (especially if it's behind me) 4. Porsche 911 sized boot 5. 12" wheels 6. underpowered (24 BHP) 7. relatively high and narrow, not a best combination to prevent keeling over in sharp corners Last edited by Wolf; 14 Jun 2001 at 23:36. |
||
|
15 Jun 2001, 12:25 (Ref:105460) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,366
|
Umm OK.
BMW K1100 RS. Pros (don't know any but am open to offers): - 78 kws and 230 kilos - goes fast - able to carry two people in relative comfort - is black - panniers (saddle bags but better) - handles OK - reliable - top speed (240 klms/hr) - fuel consumption, 5 litres per 100 klms or 20 klms a litre Cons: - little heavy in the tight stuff - I like V twins for 'feel' this is a 1100cc fuel injected four with ABS brakes and the best thing of all heated hand grips. |
||
|
17 Jun 2001, 21:25 (Ref:106266) | #7 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 6
|
own car pos and cons
Skoda 130 Rapid
Pro Nobody would steal it! Con My wife won't drive it, she wants a Peugot 205! |
||
|
17 Jun 2001, 21:43 (Ref:106276) | #8 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 67
|
Luigi- how is that a con? I call it two pros... :lol:
|
||
|
18 Jun 2001, 14:46 (Ref:106449) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 460
|
Mazda RX7 Series 2, 1983.
PROS: - Cost me less than $2000, and all I need was a screen and tyres to pass roadworthy. - Solid little 12A engine which can be very economical if I keep it under 3000 revs, but sucks fuel when I don't. I learnt this is a big hurry. - Rails are the straightest ever recorded on an RX7 of this age. It will make a good future shell for our race car. I have been told by our pit crew, if I bend it they will break me. hehehe. - Manual, first one I have ever owned (I am 21 and have only owned one other car) - Can do most of the work on it myself, as our race car is a Series 2 Mazda RX7, and I have worked on a majority of sections of the race car. - Only fits two people confortably. Now I can never be the designated driver ever again. hehehehe. - If it gets stolen soon, I will have made a profit, as it is insured for over $6000. CONS - The 12A lacks a bit in the power department, would prefer at 13B. - No boot space, so I can't use it when I go on holidays. - Doesn't fit enough people, so I can't take everyone Wakeboarding. - A lot of minor problems which need to be fixed for personal pleasure. ie. two or three switches, some interior, Dash, Clock. - No Sunroof (but then again, can still use it for racing car) - Not a Series 6. |
||
|
19 Jun 2001, 15:40 (Ref:106902) | #10 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
the shed.
bmw 316i 1989/1990 shed.
pros - **left indicator no longer ticks twice as fast as the other one (which arse put a lorry bulb in it?!) **hurrah for standard top notch bmw handling! i may not be able to out drag most new beemers but sure as hell i can outsmart them on the roundabouts **left hand drive. lots more visibility on motorways. **french plates. ner ner traffic wardens.. **makes a nice noise when you put your foot down. ** top(ish) speed 112mph. it will go faster. i just chickened. **good on petrol (averege 35mpg. YEAH baby.) **my best friend. cons - **engine lifted stright out of a small childrens go kart. **bloody heavy car. **too big. **not enough legroom in the back. **clutch is wearing out. **nowhere to put box of 6 chicken mcnuggets and sauce. **no drinks holder. **no cd player. tape player is phillips jobby that is connected up to factory standard giant headphones, which freak out at the first sign of fatboy slim or daft punk. **too slow up to 80mph (saw sticker on the back of a camper thing once - 0-60 in 3 days. that's my shed..) **gear ratios all wrong. can do 40mph in 5th. is screaming at 90mph. that'll do for now. |
|
|
20 Jun 2001, 01:50 (Ref:107178) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,702
|
Nissan 200SX
Plus Excellant acceleration in all gears. Great handling in dry, incl power slides in 1 & 2 Leather seats A/c 6 CD auto changer Nice shape (in my view) Low revs at high cruising speeds Nissan reliability Low servicing costs Entertaining views of girls getting out of low slung cars in high slung skirts Passing Nova's whilst I'm in third at 80 mph Minus Low grip in wet under power Tyre wear at rear (8,000 miles) possibly due to above power slides Rattle under rear boot lid Spark plugs at £16 each Blue metallic gets very very dirty very very quickly Boot space looks good but hinges require a lot of room All Mondeo / Astra drivers know that they can beat me off at the lights, then following their cars seeing the smoke / dust from their exhausts as they rev to 7k RPM plus in the attempt. Insurance costs Unable to see front and back bumbers. I really had to think of the minuses, all are outweighed by the pluses 10 fold All other 200SX drivers I have meet agree, very few cars come close for the price. Simon |
||
|
24 Jun 2001, 21:56 (Ref:109289) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,525
|
I'll do them in size order:-
Mk 2 Granada 2.3 LX- pros It's big. It can carry lots of stuff and four passengers in comfort. Good towing car (with added 'Pump up the back end of the car so your lights don't point at the sky when towing' shocks) Power steering and a decent sized engine make it an easy drive. Cons It's big 25 mpg Can be difficult in small car parks Series one Dutton Sierra (Ford 1600 crossflow) pros Two seats and a big load space Great in traffic, small 'footprint' and fairly nippy. Tight turning circle, great in small car parks. Not very likely to be stolen (!) Fibreglass won't rust Cons Only two seats 27 mpg noisy (not a good noise!) grotty paint Vincent Hurricane Pros It's fun Fibreglass won't rust It's fun It's noisy (good noise!) Cons 25 mpg Only two seats, but hey, who cares? Hood don't fit very well, but who needs a hood? Parts are sometimes difficult to find Not as fast as it was, engine in need of a rebuild/replacement (110 000 miles since the last rebuild) |
||
|
28 Jun 2001, 11:38 (Ref:110712) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,491
|
Volvo V70 AWD (the low version)
Pros: Great handling and road holding, No wheelspin on wet roads under acceleration, nor even on icy patch on road to Thredboe, Great safety features like SIPS and side air bags, Great extras like TRACS, ABS, very good leak proof sun roof, great 9 speaker sound system, fog lights, Low pressure turbo gives great low speed torque and good acceleration, Very comfortable on long hauls, Great to sit on rear compartment while putting ski boots on, Cons: Expensive tyres and tyre wear rate is not good, Rear axle hop on tight corners which I cannot find a solution to, Not allowed to drive fast on winding roads Not allowed to turn music up Expensive service, Lousy windscreen wipers,(too slow for heavy rain) Cannot carry large objects like other wagons because of bar just behind rear seat about 1 metre above floor of rear compartment, Other drivers hate Volvos and will get angry when I overtake, |
||
|
29 Jun 2001, 08:37 (Ref:111084) | #14 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
1 Jul 2001, 11:51 (Ref:111715) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 5,549
|
2000 Ford AU Falcon Futura 4.0 Automatic station wagon (estate car).
Pros: 157kw (210hp). Room for five adults and LOTS of luggage. Excellent towing ability with leaf sprung live rear axle. Four wheel discs, ABS, 16" alloy wheels, cruise control and CD player all standard. Local product and very popular, therefore service and parts are VERY easy to get. 7km/litre (20 mpg) when towing over 1 1/2 tons. Err, umm......excellent tyre wear, it has done 46,000km (28,750 miles) and still wears the original tyres. Cons: It's a Ford, and everything that goes with that. The AU Falcon is one of the ugliest cars ever built in Australia. It handles much worse than my previous car, a Holden VT Commodore. It sucks a lot more fuel than a VT Commodore. |
||
|
2 Jul 2001, 15:39 (Ref:112130) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 963
|
Ah, I just thought of a couple more cons and pros....
PROS Very big glove compartment. Something very rare nowadays. Ideal for putting a lot of CD's with their respective cases and no need to buy one of those 10Cd packs. CONS No temporizer on the windshield wiper. Well, at least it has a "one touch" function Vinil trunk cover means that everything slides and if you'0re carrying delicate stuff you'd better tie it up with something. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pros and cons of push & pull rod rear suspension | TEAM78 | Racing Technology | 24 | 2 Jan 2014 20:46 |
Pros & Cons of All-up FF Weight Minimum Please??? | dikko | Club Level Single Seaters | 71 | 6 Feb 2006 19:13 |
World class pros or wealthy amateurs? | KPC | Touring Car Racing | 62 | 15 Mar 2003 18:42 |
Pros and cons of your car. | Sharky | Road Car Forum | 16 | 5 Nov 2000 01:48 |