Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Indycar Series

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 Jun 2010, 04:52 (Ref:2704898)   #1
rush1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 576
rush1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It is official, Turbos back in Indy Car

THe following I think is pretty big news. Hopefully they can now get other manufacturers involved in the IRL starting in 2012.


Looking for some technical diversity in the Izod IndyCar series? Wait until the 2012 season. Officials announced new engine rules that not only focus on improving fuel economy, but may also allow an array of manufacturers to become involved with the series.

Presently, power in each and every IndyCar racer comes courtesy of a 3.5-liter V-8 developed and manufactured by Honda. Come 2012, cars will use engines sourced from several different companies, although they must conform to some basic specifications. At this point, the preliminary spec sheet calls for an engine that is turbocharged, capable of running on ethanol, has a maximum displacement of 2.4 liters, and no more than six cylinders.

In racing, those regulations are anything but stringent. IndyCar’s idea was to inspire companies to develop various engine designs to aim for the perfect balance of fuel economy and power. Fuel economy will be a critical factory, as IndyCar plans on ultimately regulating power output. Although no firm rules have been set, it’s believed output will be restricted between 550 and 700 horsepower, depending on the track.

“We will continue to evaluate rules that will keep a level playing field across the board with the various engines that could enter our sport,” said Brian Barnhart, president of competition and racing operations for IndyCar.

“For example, we could see a V-6 competing against an inline-four at all Izod IndyCar series events in the future. We will require reference engines as a benchmark in performance while looking at sonic air restrictors, fuel flow restrictions, and more as key criteria for competition.”

Although a chassis supplier has not yet been set for the 2012 car, this instills any interested manufacturer with a greater challenge, as they will need to design and build a chassis capable of housing any number of engine configurations.

Source: IndyCar
rush1 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2010, 05:06 (Ref:2704905)   #2
JagtechOhio
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
United States
Powell, Ohio USA
Posts: 2,311
JagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The formula is great. The questions are:

Will another manufacturer or engine builder make the investment to complete against the Honda V6? It's an RSVP invitation, not a done deal.

Why not allow engines which fit within the stated parameters to compete now?

Why regulate the current Honda V8 out of existance after 2011? The requirement for establishing equivilancy of different engine platforms has been acknowledged by the IRL. Why not enable low budget teams to continue using their current package beyond 2011, until engine and chassis upgrades are within their budgets?

There is already another thread in progress on this topic, you might want to join in the discussion there.
JagtechOhio is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2010, 13:02 (Ref:2705051)   #3
gttouring
Veteran
 
gttouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location:
USB 3.0
Posts: 4,536
gttouring should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
so it is up to 2.4 liters and a max of 6 cylinders.
does the angle of the opposed cylinders matter? can it be straight?
so a global racing engine from the big manufacturers can get in there and race no problem, and if a team want to shell out for a billet crank and modify the motor to be 2.4 liters its up to them..
this could be win win.
although the max capacity seems to be production size based- what is this 155CuIn?
bump it to 2.5 liters like the old old Indy formula and we have a tie in and a comparo to technology growing and creating more efficiency and power
must it be turbine supercharged? or gear/ belt driven as an option? superchargers on the street could be awesome with that whine. i suppose a turbo is more efficient and relevant so this is where they'd go.
one turbo or max number specified?
I have read all sort of press releases and none of these questions have really been answered or details pertaining to have not been addressed- or they don't know
gttouring is offline  
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story.
Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET
I am shameless ...
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2010, 20:15 (Ref:2705205)   #4
Bob Riebe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Minnesota
Posts: 2,351
Bob Riebe User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by rush1 View Post
THe following I think is pretty big news. Hopefully they can now get other manufacturers involved in the IRL starting in 2012.

“We will continue to evaluate rules that will keep a level playing field across the board with the various engines that could enter our sport,” said Brian Barnhart, president of competition and racing operations for IndyCar.
Same spec. crap only different pile.
Bob Riebe is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2010, 21:13 (Ref:2705227)   #5
JagtechOhio
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
United States
Powell, Ohio USA
Posts: 2,311
JagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Bob, there isn't any real reason so far to suggest you are wrong. Honda V6 relaces Honda V8, period.

One of the chassis makers doesn't have plans for a semi-stressed 4 cylinder anyway. If they are selected, it will be stressed V6 only. That eliminates an awful lot of potential players, who haven't done anything more than interviews.

Same old IRL, lots of talk about the future and no specific plans to expect one. Time for them to and get to work.
JagtechOhio is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2010, 23:29 (Ref:2705271)   #6
bjohnsonsmith
Race Official
20KPINAL
 
bjohnsonsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
United States
London, England
Posts: 23,756
bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!
This is good now fingers crossed on sorting a new chassis out and getting that right.
bjohnsonsmith is offline  
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying."
Colin Chapman.
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2010, 04:42 (Ref:2705332)   #7
rush1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 576
rush1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JagtechOhio View Post
Bob, there isn't any real reason so far to suggest you are wrong. Honda V6 relaces Honda V8, period.

One of the chassis makers doesn't have plans for a semi-stressed 4 cylinder anyway. If they are selected, it will be stressed V6 only. That eliminates an awful lot of potential players, who haven't done anything more than interviews.

Same old IRL, lots of talk about the future and no specific plans to expect one. Time for them to and get to work.
I like that the long term planning seems to be focused on getting other engine manufacturers into the IRL. If manufacturers other than Honda are involved it will be a success. If we are stuck with one player than this is all for nothing.

Picking a radical design for the new chassis is the way forward. It will garner the most amount of press and thus interest - something other car companies will notice.
rush1 is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2010, 04:46 (Ref:2705333)   #8
bjohnsonsmith
Race Official
20KPINAL
 
bjohnsonsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
United States
London, England
Posts: 23,756
bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!bjohnsonsmith is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally Posted by rush1 View Post
Picking a radical design for the new chassis is the way forward. It will garner the most amount of press and thus interest - something other car companies will notice.
The only thing is if it's too radical it could have the opposite effect.
bjohnsonsmith is offline  
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying."
Colin Chapman.
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2010, 05:00 (Ref:2705337)   #9
JagtechOhio
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
United States
Powell, Ohio USA
Posts: 2,311
JagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Rush, agreed on the engines 100%. Now it depends on manufacturers and builders accepting the invitation and making the investment. And how regulations for availability and equivalency are written.
JagtechOhio is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2010, 06:52 (Ref:2705350)   #10
Bob Riebe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Minnesota
Posts: 2,351
Bob Riebe User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by JagtechOhio View Post
Bob, there isn't any real reason so far to suggest you are wrong. Honda V6 relaces Honda V8, period.

One of the chassis makers doesn't have plans for a semi-stressed 4 cylinder anyway. If they are selected, it will be stressed V6 only. That eliminates an awful lot of potential players, who haven't done anything more than interviews.

Same old IRL, lots of talk about the future and no specific plans to expect one. Time for them to and get to work.
Next year is the one hundredth year since the first race and it will be, not quasi-mimic of the first with many makes (I wonder, if the rules were variety open, and a LARGE anniversary purse were offered, how many one-offs might have tried to make a name in that one race) but a glorified SCCA spec. formula race.
That annoys me to an extreme degree that the anniversary will be a joke at best.
Bob Riebe is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Jun 2010, 06:55 (Ref:2705353)   #11
JagtechOhio
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
United States
Powell, Ohio USA
Posts: 2,311
JagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJagtechOhio should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No joke in your post. All truth.
JagtechOhio is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turbos coming back in 2011? KAM Formula One 14 28 Feb 2007 17:47
FIA ready to cancel Indy verdict: Official now mark_l Formula One 55 17 Jul 2005 00:17
Official Indy 500 entry list. Down F0rce IRL Indycar Series 92 13 Apr 2005 22:43
The official Indy 500 chat thread marcus IRL Indycar Series 182 27 May 2003 00:21


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:32.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.