|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
20 Oct 2005, 11:08 (Ref:1438771) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 121
|
Are A1GP Cars Quick Enough?
Just noticed that Kovalainen in a GP2 car set a new GP2 record at Paul Ricard of 1.14 on slick tyres. Scott Speed set a time of 1.24 in the August test in the USA A1 Car. Seems that these cars are not that quick even compared to GP never mind F1. Any thoughts?
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 11:19 (Ref:1438774) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,968
|
I'd say speed is largely irrelevant.
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 11:36 (Ref:1438782) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
Lack of straightline speed is made up for by the low downforce and slick tyres producing close and exciting racing, they may look slow compared to F1 but they certainly arent slow. I think the spectacle the cars produce is far more important than them toucing 180-200mph. Perhaps we will see performance increases as the series develops. Im sure the rules & regs wont stay like they are year in year out.
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 12:06 (Ref:1438801) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,366
|
Personally id like to see the cars have a bit more top end, watching them on TV you can clearly see a differnce between them and the GP2 cars on straight line speed. Im not saying that the cars are slow, because they arent, they do however lack that "wow" factor IMO, which GP2 does have. IMO.
GP2 will be even faster in 2006 too, as reported in Autosport Magazine this week when Kovalinen recently tested the revised GP2 car, with Bridgestone slicks the car was around 2 seconds a lap quicker than the fastest time Piquet JR set at the recent test at Paul Ricard. That means that GP2 cars will be what, 5 seconds or so a lap faster than a A1 GP car in 2006? |
||
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite! |
20 Oct 2005, 12:32 (Ref:1438820) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
From what I have heard whilst its all well and good reading AS reports on some tyre testing - it is unlikely that the proposals will happen and the cars will be little changed for 06. AS seems to make a lot of assumptions and hope they are right, which in my situation we simply cannot and must not do. I have been chatting with some senior GP2 types recently and they seem to feel that the new package won't happen.
|
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
20 Oct 2005, 12:43 (Ref:1438833) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
Was it the same track layout at Ricard then??
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 12:54 (Ref:1438841) | #7 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 25
|
i think the cars are quick enough for the first season, i am pretty sure they can easily increase the power output of the Zytek, the car for sure can take up to 600bhp i would guess, and of course the tyres can be developed.
The A1 management are pretty dynamic,they will i am sure be watching how this first season goes,see how the drivers develop etc. |
|
|
20 Oct 2005, 14:19 (Ref:1438889) | #8 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
It was not the same track layout at Paul Ricard - one has to be very careful of that before determining car speeds.
Some fool on another forum looked at the Germany round and tried to claim A1GP cars were 15s a lap slower than the DTM! (He'd overlooked the fact that the touring cars used a layout which was about 1km shorter!) I think the A1GP cars are about the right speed, given the mix of experience among the drivers |
|
|
20 Oct 2005, 15:25 (Ref:1438932) | #9 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 104
|
It doesn't matter that the cars are not as quick as GP2. A1GP is a different series! They seemed plenty quick enough going round Brands Hatch.
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 16:03 (Ref:1438953) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 296
|
I'd say the car is too fast for 50% of the drivers in A1GP.
I was really looking forward to A1, but I find my interest waning as it becomes obvious that the cars may be equal but the drivers are totally mismatched. Now they've fixed the wheel nut problem (They say) I fear we may be seeing the same 3 or 4 drivers at the front every race. |
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 18:52 (Ref:1439067) | #11 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
20 Oct 2005, 19:38 (Ref:1439094) | #12 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,049
|
The absolute speed of an A1GP car is irrelevant.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
20 Oct 2005, 21:43 (Ref:1439204) | #13 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,749
|
John Watson was quoting 160 miles per hour on some of the in-field straights at Lausitz, this from exiting a the previous corner without the aid of traction control and computers automatically changing up through the gearbox at the perfect moment.
That sounds perfectly fast enough to me. |
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 22:43 (Ref:1439242) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,967
|
It's a tricky balance. People who want speed for speeds sake. People who want racing at the edge of a car's high-performance envelope. Easy to increase basic speed - up engine power.
I like the idea personally of A1's concept of picking a high-end formaula and making it work. Once it works, then, if need be, increase engine power, keep everything else the same ... that will increase braking distances, enhance the need for drivers, without aids, to control the cars on exit, all good stuff. Depends what the crowd want, commensurate with safety considerations. I suspect that most people cant' tell the difference between 160mph and 170mph. |
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 22:45 (Ref:1439243) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,967
|
I wish I could spell/punctuate properly after a bathtubfull of wine, on this, my birthday
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 22:45 (Ref:1439244) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,967
|
(I don't recall getting a card from you gits!)
|
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 23:06 (Ref:1439255) | #17 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,840
|
Happy birthday Mr.Jinxx - hic!
The speediest thing A1-GP need to do in the UK is get the TV coverage on terrestrial TV, highlights if necessary and in news reports. There are still a great number of households without Sky and no chance of seeing it, even at the pub when races take place in non-UK friendly timezones or when there is a football match on the other Sky channels. The mainstream media blurted out that it will be the 'new' F1 around the time of the Brands race, yet I bet they will not announce the winners of future races on the news as they do with F1. The biggest news to them typically was the car rolling at Paddock. |
||
|
20 Oct 2005, 23:18 (Ref:1439259) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 588
|
I think the worst thing in A1 is presently the wheel nut problem and I hope that in Estoril, teams will not have this problem. In my opinion, A1 tried to do what F1 presently does not have ie, overtaking, sprint race, scores for pole position sitter and fastest lap and the 1 mechanic per wheel system. On the other hand they lack speed and it is something that all motorsports lovers love and miss in A1.
|
||
|
26 Nov 2005, 11:20 (Ref:1470665) | #19 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 394
|
i got a question related to the speed of a1gp.
I noticed a1gp is using a 3.4l v8 zytek engine. As some of you might know Zytek already had a 3.4l v8 which is being used in sportcars. The 3.4l v8 that is being used in a1gp is a different one though. The dimensions are different (height, width and lenght all are way different), hp is 520 compared to 540 in sc's and the engine is +-10 kg heavier. Anybody got a clue why A1gp chose to have zytek develop a new engine instead of picking the existing sportcars-engine? It seems to me that the engines are comparable in performance (the engine could also be reduced in performance by a restrictor if it was to fast, as is common practise in sportcars.) and the reliability of course is no problem (it is a endurance engine after all). So why develop a new one? Also, topspeed of a1gp is fairly low (250 kph at sepang if i'm not mistaken), while Team Jota-zytek had a topspeed of 307 kph at le mans this year (they had a minimum weight of 700 kg, 100? kg less than a1gp). Since the engines seem quite comparable, i'm i right if i assume the chassis lola has designed has a very negative downforce setting for topspeed? |
|
|
27 Nov 2005, 04:39 (Ref:1471103) | #20 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 45
|
as far as i know the cars an engines are delevoped to get another 50+ horsepower.they will increase it when they are sure they cars and drivers can handle it
|
|
|
27 Nov 2005, 08:02 (Ref:1471195) | #21 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
The tyres are quite hard too - a softer compound could take several seconds off laptimes
|
|
|
27 Nov 2005, 11:55 (Ref:1471276) | #22 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 351
|
What a fuss! Just leave it as it is.
The last sprint race at Sepang was for me the best high level single seater race that i have seen for at least 10 years from an overtaking point of view. This series IS on the right path so what we don't need to do is fiddle with it yet, let it develop! The speed of the cars is not an issue IMO. |
||
|
27 Nov 2005, 14:37 (Ref:1471359) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,219
|
Thank you paddockman! Are Jani and Premat mismatched? No! Kerr and Jani? No! Is this some of the best racing I have ever seen? Yes!
Sure Premat, Jani etc are mismatched compared with Teng and Shaaban for example, but there is more than enough thrilling dices in an A1 race to keep me on the edge of my seat. I don't know where some of you guys are coming from. There are leaders at tail-enders in any series. I don't remember Mathius Lauda troubling the leaders in GP2 either, and is a Toro Rosso or MF1 driver going to be challenging for a podium next year? |
||
|
28 Nov 2005, 00:56 (Ref:1471778) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,366
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite! |
28 Nov 2005, 08:40 (Ref:1471909) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,968
|
North West Formula Ford Championship, Legends, XR Challenge....
|
||
__________________
...not with a bayonet through your neck you couldn’t. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how quick 0-60 ect for a f1 car? | tangoed sparky | Formula One | 39 | 2 Mar 2004 19:55 |
the quick | gttouring | Virtual Racers | 5 | 28 Jan 2003 17:17 |
My quick intro | Richard Sneader | Marshals Forum | 3 | 8 Feb 2002 10:35 |
DC quick in new MP4-17 | Raven | Formula One | 13 | 25 Jan 2002 18:56 |
Quick Questions | David McManus | Formula One | 9 | 7 Aug 2000 21:19 |