|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Feb 2008, 18:09 (Ref:2121822) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
Road supercars vs. race supercars
I'm quite confused as far as the main principle that makes a racecar so much faster than a road car is concerned. Which are the main factors that make the racecar lap a track so much quicker than a roadcar? For instance, you'd expect a car like the Bugatti Veyron, with its 1001 hp and 407 km/h top speed, to be comparable to an LMP1 car, or at least to a 1995-1998 era GT1. But if you compare its times on let's say Nordschleife to that of a Porsche 956 of the 1980's, it's 1 min 30 sec slower! Why is that? Because if you compare the performance statistics, the Veyron seems to beat many racecars: 1001 hp, even with 1800 kilos, is comparable to 600 hp at 900 kilos. And it's not just about the Veyron, it's about the whole elite bunch of road sportscars. This was just an example.
For a while I thought the acceleration might be the main factor, but the LMP1's don't reach 100 km/h in less than 2.5 seconds... I guess the Ferrari 333SP was declared to hit 100 km/h in about 3.1 seconds, from 0 km/h. |
|
|
5 Feb 2008, 18:14 (Ref:2121827) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
There are more things then just HP and TOP speed that go into making a sports car, let alone a super car.
Look at the Circuit LaSarth. P1 cars are allowed to run down to 3:30 per lap, no faster. With top speeds just under 200+/- mph on the straights. Several years ago 240-260 mph was realistic, but rules and safety ( plus chicanes) slowed the P1 cars down |
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
5 Feb 2008, 18:18 (Ref:2121832) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
a 360 NGT is quite a bit faster on fiorano than an enzo.. that's the difference between racecars and supercars
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
5 Feb 2008, 18:58 (Ref:2121861) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
it's obvious that there is a great difference... the question is what is it, actually, if not pure statistical performance (top speed, hp etc)?
|
|
|
5 Feb 2008, 19:02 (Ref:2121862) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,618
|
tyres is a big difference .. so braking cornering mostly
|
||
__________________
Apocalypse becomes creation / Gor-Gor shall erase the nation Before you leap into his gizzard / Fall and worship Tyrant lizard Ciao Marco |
5 Feb 2008, 19:17 (Ref:2121873) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
|
||
|
5 Feb 2008, 19:23 (Ref:2121878) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Quote:
|
||
|
5 Feb 2008, 19:28 (Ref:2121882) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 573
|
Top speed is irrelevant if the car can't brake and handle corners quickly. The Veyron would feel like a truck in the corners compared to an LMP1.
|
||
|
5 Feb 2008, 19:29 (Ref:2121883) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
yap, those look like pretty good answers!
|
|
|
5 Feb 2008, 20:25 (Ref:2121921) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
Coming out of a corner you'll see something like an R10 make mincemeat of a GT1 car, which itself is massively quicker around a lap than it's supercar equivalent. This is a good comparison:- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufQxcsHlMnQ DBR9 10 seconds a lap quicker than an MC12 road car over a short lap. |
||
|
5 Feb 2008, 20:39 (Ref:2121934) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
The Group C Nissan in 1990 did a 3.27 in qualifying with 1200bhp, but was running 3.35-40 race pace. The R10/908 with 700bhp ran 3.26 qualifying and 3.26-3.35 race pace. The fastest ever qualifying lap was a 3.21 by a Peugeot 905 in '92 (way quicker than even the Toyota TS010), but during the race it again was running 3.32-3.40 laps. |
||
|
5 Feb 2008, 20:46 (Ref:2121938) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 761
|
theres a massive difference......
aero, suspension, tyres, set up. what make a race car fast? tyres suspesion aero engine in that order.... just because you have 1000hp doesnt mean a 240hp exige cant show you the way around the track |
||
|
5 Feb 2008, 21:34 (Ref:2121973) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
The last 2 minuet on the clock of the Super Bowl really takes 15 mins |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
5 Feb 2008, 22:50 (Ref:2122020) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,306
|
Quote:
They used
|
|||
|
5 Feb 2008, 23:57 (Ref:2122062) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 254
|
From a comparison of GT3 RSR and Carrera GT by Road and Track:
Quote:
|
||
|
6 Feb 2008, 03:20 (Ref:2122134) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
They could function as a sort of unit, there was no fumbling disconnect between members. |
|||
|
6 Feb 2008, 07:26 (Ref:2122185) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 626
|
Tires, aerodynamics, brakes. The first two are the main difference between super cars and race cars. Race cars come with slicks that are only used for an hour or so, even supercar tires will last you 5,000 miles (not on a race track)
Aerodynamics, almost all very fast cars still generate lift at high speed. The best ones (like the Veyron) make some downforce at speed. On a road car you will max out at about 1 g of grip on a skidpad. Race cars such as the Aston Martin GT1 generate about 1.15 gs on a skidpad, but that's at 40 miles per hour. At speed they are good for 2.5 Gs, while a supercar is far, far behind. Stuff like special gearing contributes as well. Of course even supercars are designed to run for a long time and not a couple of races, so there is a lot of insulation and other stuff that adds on weight. BTW, the Veyron is a luxury speed rocket. There is a lot of unecessary weight that you can remove if you wished to race it. Last edited by chewymonster; 6 Feb 2008 at 07:28. |
|
|
7 Feb 2008, 11:42 (Ref:2123193) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
Yes, it was indeed interesting! Thanks! So a road car in the class of the Carrera GT would be significantly slower even than the GT2 category, not to mention GT1s or LMPs. I wonder if that stays that way for Le Mans too, considering the huge straights of the French circuit. The GT2s hit their peak speed on the Mulsanne at about 290 km/h, I guess a Carrera GT (or a Bugatti Veyron) would beat that. But still, on an overall lap time, I guess they'd get beaten even by the GT2s and certainly by the GT1s.
|
|
|
7 Feb 2008, 17:15 (Ref:2123373) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
For the most part Supercars are built for wealthy consumers, not really to race.
|
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
8 Feb 2008, 14:59 (Ref:2124172) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
however, this way, paradoxally, the road supercars actually become a lot more dangerous than racecars... i mean, all these inherent characteristics of the racecars (especially downforce etc.), plus the permanent changes of the regulations in safety directions really put a race pilot in a much more secure position than a normal driver in a high-performance car. |
||
|
8 Feb 2008, 15:01 (Ref:2124173) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
so ultimately what's the big idea behind all of these safety measures of the fia?? the racecars are anyway much safer than those sold to the large public...
|
|
|
8 Feb 2008, 15:13 (Ref:2124180) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
Quote:
a roll cage is much stronger then a cars body structure. But road going cars with air bags helps saves lives by softening the blow of an impact. However, even with a roll cage, race seat and 6-point harness, helmet with HANS, a 200 kpm impact is going to hurt like heck if not move internal body parts and rip them apart as the drivers body stays in firmly in place belted into the race seat. This might be why we see race car drivers TRY to spin or graze a hard object vs smashing into it directly. Grazing or glancing blows defects or redirects the energy of that crash. |
|||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
8 Feb 2008, 15:20 (Ref:2124184) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
interesting point there. and of course, the racecars are driven at their maximum at all times, on the other hand, the race drivers have a much greater experience than everyday rich people who buy a bugatti or a mclaren.
still, i see no real safety point in reducing the racecars performance - ultimately, what's the big difference between a 350-380 km/h impact versus a 320-340 km/h? i guess a 330 km/h hit is more than enough for serious trouble, if that's the case. |
|
|
9 Feb 2008, 07:16 (Ref:2124695) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
An Acura ARX-01b was able to take Turn 1 at Sebring flat. That's a result of mechanical grip (suspension and tires), and aerodynamic downforce. No street car could do that, regardless of horsepower or any other routinely used "statistical" measures of performance or characteristics.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Supercars out, real Supercars in at AGP? | inpitlane | Australasian Touring Cars. | 192 | 17 Nov 2006 11:13 |
V8 Supercars to Race In Bahrain | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 27 | 4 Mar 2006 11:15 |