Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 Jun 2000, 16:19 (Ref:16093)   #1
Franklin
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location:
Orlando, Florida, US
Posts: 211
Franklin should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Given that Indy cars are interface vehicles rather than land vehicles (i.e., vehicles operating in the air/ground interface), there are a variety of past and present design features which would make 300 mph top speeds with Indy cars much more manageable.

1. Steering fins (first tested by Hermann Lang in 1952 for a Mercedes entry at Indy and since used on various land speed record cars).

2. A LARGE tail fin located BEHIND the gearbox (virtually standard equipment on many Bonneville streamliners).

3. Variable incidence wings (now being used on Sprint cars and Super Modifieds).

4. Air (i.e., speed) brakes (first used in the thirties on land speed cars even before being adopted for airplanes and used over thirty years later on the 1967 STP gas turbine car).
Franklin is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2000, 02:54 (Ref:16225)   #2
Liz
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location:
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12,451
Liz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridLiz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tech Forum, I think. Thank you.
Liz is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2000, 05:49 (Ref:16269)   #3
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well i could go on and on...but...

Of course they could make the cars go at 300mph, but why would they do that? The things are unsafe as they are (and dont give us the parachute lecture again), do you think making the cars faster will make it safer? Aren't they trying everything in their power to slow things down and make them safer?



Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2000, 14:44 (Ref:16309)   #4
Franklin
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location:
Orlando, Florida, US
Posts: 211
Franklin should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
What they've been doing, Crash Test, is applying bandaid solutions to 20 to 30 year old configurations that have long since been pushed beyond their limits.
Franklin is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2000, 23:21 (Ref:16356)   #5
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well why dont they have parachutes or ponds of water?

Another thing, it would be fine to have the cars going at 300mph, but even a small accident at that speed would be like a plane crash. They first have to develope a more solid human being, because currently they are the softest part of the vehicle...
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rallycross past and present King Arthur Rallying & Rallycross 7 25 Nov 2004 12:52
Toyota Allegations Past and Present Korr Formula One 16 3 Dec 2003 15:32
adding oil at Le Mans in the past and present? djb Motorsport History 6 8 Sep 2001 08:15
Drivers poll - past and present vauxhall Touring Car Racing 12 13 Mar 2001 22:22


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.