|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
8 Jul 2013, 20:00 (Ref:3275557) | #1 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,123
|
The most artificial thing in F1 is safety cars
We saw Webber finishing seventh after being minutes behind. If a driver's just stopped and the safety car comes out, "harsh luck sunshine". I'm surprised there isn't more feeling against this race-spoiling decider.
It's far too big a factor. For safety, the red flag works better (or would if they could speed up the starting procedure). You could restart cars at timed intervals so the drivers are separated by the times they were before. The safety car is clearly not the best solution. It also wastes laps. |
|
|
8 Jul 2013, 21:44 (Ref:3275589) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 390
|
With all the GPS kit onboard they could easily identify the gaps behind the leader at the time of the safety car or red flag, and 'unlock' a cars performance based on gap to the leader as they go green.
|
||
|
8 Jul 2013, 21:50 (Ref:3275592) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
I think the principle of the safety car is fine, the problem I have with it is that is that it has now become part of the show.
The safety car served its function much better when lapped cars stayed where the were. It annoys me now how lapped cars are released as it is surely more dangerous having cars going at various speeds and it also means the safety car remains on track for longer. |
||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
8 Jul 2013, 22:11 (Ref:3275602) | #4 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Safety cars are fine. The regulations that have been put into place for safety car periods are retarded.
All ties into the DRS/Pirelli-addled show though. |
|
|
8 Jul 2013, 23:09 (Ref:3275620) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,660
|
Safety Cars are not remotely artificial - they are used to control the field if needed. DRS in specific zones only, Kers for a certain amount of seconds per lap, Tyres that degrade hyper fast, parc ferme rules between Q and race, split Q sessions - these are WAY more artificial than safety cars.
|
||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
9 Jul 2013, 01:58 (Ref:3275677) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
9 Jul 2013, 10:10 (Ref:3275796) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
If I had asked my customer what they wanted, they would've said a faster horse. -Henry Ford |
9 Jul 2013, 12:06 (Ref:3275856) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Compared with PIT STOPS, tyres designed not to last, Kers, DRS and telemetry, then safety cars are sensible and proportionate.
Jim |
||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
9 Jul 2013, 12:23 (Ref:3275867) | #9 | ||
#WhatAreHashTags
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,526
|
How true. To quote Mario Andretti about safety cars, many years ago "You win some - you lose some"
|
||
__________________
John Smith Clerk of the Course and MSA Steward Race Director for 360MRC |
9 Jul 2013, 12:46 (Ref:3275878) | #10 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
You could make it possible that all drivers must pit for tyres, but some won't have tyres to pit for, nor do they necessarily need new tyres having only pitted for them three laps before the safety car came out. You may also remember the times when the pits were closed during a safety car period? That could work now, since it wouldn't be possible for drivers to run out of fuel because the safety car period prevented them from returning to the pits. |
||
|
9 Jul 2013, 16:22 (Ref:3275957) | #11 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,123
|
Quote:
DRS and KERS is also the same for everyone, whereas you can be screwed by the safety car. |
||
|
9 Jul 2013, 17:11 (Ref:3275969) | #12 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Agreed. Which is why I don't like there to be too long a period of time elapsing between there needing to be a safety car and when one is actually deployed. I'm not saying that anyone would rig the race result by figuring out which team is most likely going to benefit from a safety car, but I would like there to be no time at all in which to even think about it. DRS, KERS and tyres, on the other hand, could never give you that sort of advantage.
|
|
|
9 Jul 2013, 21:26 (Ref:3276066) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,422
|
One thing I remember from the race is that when Webber got released through the field.. his lap catching up to the back of the pack was only .2 off the fastest lap at the time. Also the track was cleared by that time and I think we got at least one extra lap waiting for him to catch back up.
|
||
__________________
Local Track: Aldo Scribante What sort of motorist are you... Smooth or Hairy I'm definitely hairy. |
9 Jul 2013, 21:32 (Ref:3276070) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,660
|
Quote:
If you want to look at what things can impact a race result more, then I agree that SC can do that - but that isn't the subject of this thread - this thread is about what is the most artificial thing in F1, not what thing has the biggest affect on a race result. DRS, KERS and the other items I mentioned are very artificial - KERS is artificial as they are only permitted to use so many seconds per lap, if it was available to use at any time subject only to each team's capacity to generate power in the system, that would not be artificial but I take your point that it's the same for everyone - doesn't make it less artificial though. DRS is most definitely not the same for everyone - car in front doesn't get to use it, so it is very artificial in the way it produces passing moves. |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
11 Jul 2013, 04:23 (Ref:3276444) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
I'd say DRS and reverse grids are what you refer to as "artificial", the rest are just aspects of motorsport. KERS and tyres are the same for everyone, it's just another aspect of the sport. Quote:
KERS keeps F1 road relevant and it's limited for good reason, I see no problem there. Last edited by Beryl; 11 Jul 2013 at 04:33. |
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 05:50 (Ref:3276450) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,660
|
Quote:
I'm fine with KERS per se, it's the artificial restriction of the time it can operate per lap that is well, artificial. The best way to have real road relevance would be to have unlimited KERS as that would push teams to develop better and more cutting edge systems, which could then flow back into the road car world in a much better way, provide commercial opportunity for teams and go back to "racing improving the breed". Take your point on cost containment but the time restriction is most definitely artificial - it effectively produces a "push to pass" or "push to defend" system that ends up with drivers taking a punt to use it to for example keep a car behind just enough to avoid DRS. All good, that's a skill but one that the punters can't see and a very artificial form of racing. |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
11 Jul 2013, 06:07 (Ref:3276455) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 06:25 (Ref:3276457) | #18 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,660
|
Quote:
To me, F1 (teams and FIA) brought in items such as DRS, Kers with time limits, split Q combined with new parc ferme structure as artificial means to spice up a Grand Prix weekend, rather than grasping the nettle and evolving the sporting and technical regulations in a more genuine way to achieve a better competition. You are right that they are sporting regs, I simply have said that in my view, they are more artificial than safety cars - and the whole point of this thread is that safety cars are the most artificial thing in F1 but I don't believe that to be the case. |
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
11 Jul 2013, 08:45 (Ref:3276491) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 612
|
I can only agree that DRS is artificial and unneeded.
KERS is limited for the very important reasons I highlighted earlier. If KERS was unlimited, Ferrari wouldn't bat an eye to plunging 100 million euros into developing their system. The sport would eventually kill itself. Sauber is struggling as it is, F1 does not need a KERS war right now. Or probably ever. As for the rest, it's all just there to make the racing better, just like every other racing series does on this planet. The knock-out qualifying is a very entertaining system, the best that has ever been in F1. And I still don't understand how it's artificial. What makes a single session or single lap runs more natural than knock-out qualifying? It's just another form of qualifying, no more or less natural than any other. Parc ferme gives overworked mechanics time off (and makes things more interesting during mixed-condition weekends),and though perhaps it is unneeded, it isn't taking away much from F1 either. The tires are now made fragile to make the racing interesting. It's a welcome change from the Bridgestone days where the tires were practically rocks and hardly wore out. Now it creates more overtaking and strategy is more variable. Good. And since all tires wear out too, it's hardly "artificial". Tire wear is a spectrum and the current tires are near one end of it, but it's still on that spectrum. But safety cars? The FIA could use the same system they use in Dubai, where during caution periods a speed limiter is activated on all cars. Or something else. The safety car is a natural thing, but it affects the racing much much more than anything "artificial". In Germany, the safety car gave big opportunities to Kimi and Webber that they otherwise would not have had. The "artificial" elements are the same for everyone, so they become "natural" in a way. A safety car stands out unnaturally because of how drastically it can alter a race. |
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 10:13 (Ref:3276518) | #20 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
I'm reasonably happy that 2014 will see things like KERS (ERS-K, as it will be known then) are given more freedom with regard to power output and length of time in which they can be deployed during a single lap. I don't think that energy recovery systems are artificial in any way.
|
|
|
11 Jul 2013, 10:23 (Ref:3276526) | #21 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,660
|
Quote:
Agree completely that the sc can impact the race significantly - I don't agree with you that the "Dubai solution" would necessarily be the answer for F1 but that's another discussion - with a lot of detail in it. The point of this thread is not about what impacts the race more but what is most artificial and in my view, the safety car is not the most artificial thing in F1 and is less artificial than the items you and I have been discussing. Quote:
|
||||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
11 Jul 2013, 10:33 (Ref:3276536) | #22 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
||
|
11 Jul 2013, 10:35 (Ref:3276539) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,660
|
|||
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue |
11 Jul 2013, 16:40 (Ref:3276658) | #24 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Jul 2013, 18:55 (Ref:3276717) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
I don't believe that F1 is, or will be in the future road relevant at all, or needs to be for that matter ...
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Team] Sauber F1 in trouble | 321Go | Formula One | 166 | 7 Nov 2013 16:29 |
F1 Safety Cars / Medical Cars | Mark Stevens | Formula One | 8 | 21 May 2004 18:10 |
Artificial Wet Races | Hobson | Formula One | 6 | 1 Apr 2001 21:18 |