|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Jun 2006, 03:04 (Ref:1641266) | #1 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
|
Help Please
Is there a rule of thumb for Shutter speed when taking pics at Circuits.
I am trying to get nice sharp photos that avoid the wheels looking like they are not moving I have tried 60, 125 - too slow and blurred 1000+ - the car looks like it is parked as there is no movement, but nice and sharp. I have had some success panning at around 250 but inconsistent. What do people usually use Many thanks for your help regards Mike |
|
|
26 Jun 2006, 10:07 (Ref:1641464) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 441
|
I advise practise.
The slower the shutter speed the harder it is to take, but it's also where you'l get more movement in your picture. So just develop your techique. I'd say though go no higher than 250 for a "moving wheels pic" and go as low as you can get away with. Personally I find the focus just as important as shutter speed in regards to the sharpness of a shot, more important. So also make sure your focus is right, and if you're on auto focus, concentrate on your timing. Sometimes AI Servo can be a bit slow and you end up with a soft picture because the cars not quite in focus. |
||
|
26 Jun 2006, 12:36 (Ref:1641582) | #3 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
HTH |
|||
__________________
"If something's worth doing, it's worth over doing", Justin Hawkins |
26 Jun 2006, 12:49 (Ref:1641593) | #4 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
|
Thanks
Many thanks for the help
really appreciated Good luck in the World Cup Maybe AUS v England in Final????? here's hoping regards Mike |
|
|
26 Jun 2006, 13:02 (Ref:1641606) | #5 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If something's worth doing, it's worth over doing", Justin Hawkins |
26 Jun 2006, 14:52 (Ref:1641697) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 441
|
I use both a 10D and a 20D.
And I still tend to get better results in my view, with the 10D. Maybe getting the 20D calibrated isn't a bad idea. Because in theory, I should not still be getting better results with the 10D. |
||
|
26 Jun 2006, 15:33 (Ref:1641722) | #7 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If something's worth doing, it's worth over doing", Justin Hawkins |
27 Jun 2006, 07:29 (Ref:1642297) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,189
|
I agree about the 10D vs 20D ...the 20D in all the reviews was supposed to have improved the AI issues the 10D had but my experience has been just the opposite
|
||
__________________
"we love the winter, it brings us closer together" |
29 Jun 2006, 15:47 (Ref:1644249) | #9 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 25
|
I would suggest that you have a problem with your 20D if you think the 10D gave better photos.
The 20D shots that we get from our photographer's are excelent and consistent. Frank Motorphotography Australia |
||
|