Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 Nov 2007, 00:28 (Ref:2062573)   #1
ss_collins
Veteran
 
ss_collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Nigeria
Mooresville, NC
Posts: 6,704
ss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridss_collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
New LMP2 engine - and (more) rule changes

well the 4 litre rumours seem to be true - an all new LMP2 engine based on the BMW V8 has been unvieled - its a 4 litre V8 producing 530bhp and 500nm torque - its also very low cost in comparison to other engines.

More details and pics when I'm awake!
ss_collins is offline  
__________________
Chase the horizon
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 00:31 (Ref:2062575)   #2
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
what is the time frame?
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 00:44 (Ref:2062587)   #3
The359
Veteran
 
The359's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
United States
Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,437
The359 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Isn't the maximum LMP2 displacement 3.4 liters? Why would the ACO approve larger engines if they keep trying to slow the LMP2 class down?
The359 is offline  
__________________
Nulla Tenaci Invia Est Via
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 00:58 (Ref:2062597)   #4
chewymonster
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 626
chewymonster should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think you can make a 4.0 but it has to be based on a production engine. This engine would satisfy the rules, but I am sure it won't be competative.
chewymonster is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 01:17 (Ref:2062604)   #5
pirenzo
Veteran
 
pirenzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
London, UK
Posts: 10,241
pirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridpirenzo should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I'd imagine it might not be that competitive now, but if the ACO continues to slowly fall into line with FIA thinking it won't be long before a production based engine block is mandatory, especially for the 'cheap', 'privateer' LMP2 cars.
pirenzo is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 02:04 (Ref:2062611)   #6
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by The359
Isn't the maximum LMP2 displacement 3.4 liters? Why would the ACO approve larger engines if they keep trying to slow the LMP2 class down?
3.4L for a non homologated engine & 4.0L for a homologated engine. If I remember correctly both Porsche and Acura were petitioning the ACO, at least verbally, for the rule to be changed to 4.0L to be able to build more reliability into the engines (supposedly).

L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 07:02 (Ref:2062694)   #7
Justin Moran
Veteran
 
Justin Moran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
UK-ROI
St Helens
Posts: 2,356
Justin Moran should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJustin Moran should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by HORNDAWG
3.4L for a non homologated engine & 4.0L for a homologated engine. If I remember correctly both Porsche and Acura were petitioning the ACO, at least verbally, for the rule to be changed to 4.0L to be able to build more reliability into the engines (supposedly).

L.P.
Given the LMP2 attrition rate at Le Mans this year, thats not a bad idea!
Justin Moran is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 09:08 (Ref:2062768)   #8
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I know Heini-Mader did a 4 Litre BMW V8 in the late 90's for the IRL series, they leter converted it to a sports car engine, then Mechachrome bought them out, and its now the basis of the Renault GP2 engine.......wasnt Kruse running a 3.4 version of this GP2 engine, but the transporter and car burnt out and killed the project a few months back

but your saying its all new, so I'm guessing its based on the new M3 V8, which I'm told is much lighter than the previous V8, by about 30 Kg I think......which is a step in the right direction, as the old BMW V8 was very heavy.......will be interesting to see whos doing it!
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 10:36 (Ref:2062848)   #9
The359
Veteran
 
The359's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
United States
Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 2,437
The359 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by knighty
I know Heini-Mader did a 4 Litre BMW V8 in the late 90's for the IRL series, they leter converted it to a sports car engine, then Mechachrome bought them out, and its now the basis of the Renault GP2 engine.......wasnt Kruse running a 3.4 version of this GP2 engine, but the transporter and car burnt out and killed the project a few months back

but your saying its all new, so I'm guessing its based on the new M3 V8, which I'm told is much lighter than the previous V8, by about 30 Kg I think......which is a step in the right direction, as the old BMW V8 was very heavy.......will be interesting to see whos doing it!
T2M was using the Mader V8 back down to 3.4 liters before they dropped out of the series. They were way off the pace.

Kruse used a normal Judd XV.
The359 is offline  
__________________
Nulla Tenaci Invia Est Via
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 10:45 (Ref:2062853)   #10
zac510
Veteran
 
zac510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
zac510 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sam is this production block going to be stressed?
zac510 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 10:47 (Ref:2062855)   #11
WouterM
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Netherlands
Posts: 306
WouterM should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by zac510
Sam is this production block going to be stressed?
I think there are only very few stressed engines in LMP1 and none in LMP2 at the moment. So that would be an interesting development.
WouterM is offline  
__________________
No soup for you!
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 11:01 (Ref:2062864)   #12
zac510
Veteran
 
zac510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
zac510 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well more, being based on a production engine.

I always thought most engines in protos were stressed/semi stressed.
zac510 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 11:36 (Ref:2062893)   #13
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
update is on DSC.......Sodemo are the people behind the proposal to the ACO.....aparrently they are considering 4 litre for production derived LMP2 engines only for 4 litre rules, weight is predicted at 140Kg, power 530bhp.

the only thing that worries me about this engine is the alusil bores, they dont like much more that what they were designed for, otherwise they scuff up badly, buth this can easily be fixed with liners or nikasil coating.

140Kg is a big improvement over the last BMW motor......it was around the 180 to 200Kg I think......I think the Porsche, Judd and Honda units are around 100 to 110Kg......so 140Kg is not a bad starting point.

the 4.0 will have more torque and rev lower, I wonder if this will make Honda nad Porsche adapt production based units too......as this is what LMP2 should be all about......cost effective racing.
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 11:46 (Ref:2062901)   #14
WouterM
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Netherlands
Posts: 306
WouterM should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I wonder how deep BMW is involved in this.
WouterM is offline  
__________________
No soup for you!
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 12:13 (Ref:2062915)   #15
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by WouterM
I wonder how deep BMW is involved in this.
I reckon they would give the project their blessing, but in all reality this engine seems to be aimed at teams that cant afford a Judd, Honda or Porsche unit.......so I doubt BMW will be involved from a technical or commercial point of view.......but I'm happy to be proven wrong!
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 12:22 (Ref:2062916)   #16
gwyllion
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Belgium
Posts: 8,738
gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!gwyllion is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by knighty
but in all reality this engine seems to be aimed at teams that cant afford a Judd, Honda or Porsche unit.......
Our teams that want a LMP2 engine that can run reliably for 24 hours
gwyllion is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 12:28 (Ref:2062923)   #17
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwyllion
Our teams that want a LMP2 engine that can run reliably for 24 hours
you said that, not me!.....cough....as you all know, I'm a real fan of the LMP2 engine reliability over 24 hrs.......
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 12:40 (Ref:2062928)   #18
Tom908V12
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
France
Paris(France)
Posts: 1,122
Tom908V12 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Welter Racing should also come in 08 LMP2 world with a diesel/diester V8 probably based on Peugeot engines


But I still wait the presentation of the team that was scheduled for end october but postponed for later...
Tom908V12 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 13:03 (Ref:2062958)   #19
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwyllion
Our teams that want a LMP2 engine that can run reliably for 24 hours
Then you sure as heck dont what an engine based off a 'production' engine.

and any 'production' engine that is reliable for 24 hours would be almost double the cost of the 'production' car.
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 13:31 (Ref:2062978)   #20
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom908V12
Welter Racing should also come in 08 LMP2 world with a diesel/diester V8 probably based on Peugeot engines


But I still wait the presentation of the team that was scheduled for end october but postponed for later...
you what?.....where did you hear this?.........I thought diesel wasnt yet allowed LMP2.......does anyone know anything about diesel LMP2 regs?.......
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 14:14 (Ref:2063028)   #21
Tom908V12
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
France
Paris(France)
Posts: 1,122
Tom908V12 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I've read that in a thread(in french)on the Endurance-Info forum...
Tom908V12 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 14:45 (Ref:2063055)   #22
knighty
Veteran
 
knighty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Essex
Posts: 1,406
knighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridknighty should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
hmmm.....I'll believe it when I see it

But back to the 4.0 LMP2 regs…… if the 3.4 porsche is revving to 10,500......with some rough maths, that would imply for a 4.0 to produce equivalent power, it would need to rev to 8925rpm…….thats still a bit of a screamer in my book!……also, the BMW engine will only be able to use its bare block and head, its still going to need a new flat plane crank, new rods & pistons, plated/linered bores, new cams, valvetrain, dry sump…..by the time they have done all that, its still going to be a pricey bit of kit.
knighty is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 17:46 (Ref:2063196)   #23
zac510
Veteran
 
zac510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
zac510 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
sam's having a pretty long sleep!
zac510 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2007, 22:19 (Ref:2063414)   #24
Bob Riebe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Minnesota
Posts: 2,351
Bob Riebe User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
Then you sure as heck dont what an engine based off a 'production' engine.

and any 'production' engine that is reliable for 24 hours would be almost double the cost of the 'production' car.
Well you could always run for twenty four hours in the back of the pack.
Bob Riebe is offline  
Quote
Old 9 Nov 2007, 00:47 (Ref:2063436)   #25
Nick6
Racer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States
Posts: 409
Nick6 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Link?
Nick6 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ferrari LMP2 engine? FIRE Sportscar & GT Racing 17 18 Oct 2007 08:22
New Judd engine for LMP1/what about LMP2? Bentley03 Sportscar & GT Racing 20 14 Jul 2006 12:04
LMP2 engine changes? (merged) JAG Sportscar & GT Racing 31 20 Jun 2006 10:20
engine rule billiaml Formula One 4 30 Jul 2002 13:51
One engine rule Roselady3 NASCAR & Stock Car Racing 28 29 Dec 2001 16:08


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.