|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
7 Aug 2006, 12:53 (Ref:1676520) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 499
|
rallycross weight limits & 2lrs stocks
Over the season so far I've heard numerous stories floating round the paddock about introducing weight limits for stock hatch in 2007 and also stories about introducing a 2ltr stock hatch style class.
Does anybody know anything more about either of these as it's now the time of year that people will start to be thinking about what they are doing in rallycross next season.. I definatelly think the 2ltr class needs to happen really as there needs to be a bridge class between stockhatch and supermod's. It would also open up an entirely new selection of cars to the sport which can only be a good thing. I know there are a lot of stockhatch driver that would like to step up, but can't afford the budgets of a supermod racers so i'm sure the class could be a success. si |
||
__________________
superscooby from lancashire.. and yes we use gravy instead of racefuel up here. |
7 Aug 2006, 15:01 (Ref:1676656) | #2 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 58
|
i agree with Mr horton a 2l standard engined class based on the stockhatch
regs would be an excellent progression for those of us who would like to step up a bit without breaking the bank. Standard engines and restricted regs would keep the same close racing spirit of stock hatch and the extra power might add a bit more excitement. As Mr Horton says it would also open the options for the possible use of different cars,again in my book not a bad thing. |
||
|
7 Aug 2006, 15:07 (Ref:1676659) | #3 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,330
|
You'd have to have weight limits as well to try and prevent one car type dominating in the way the 205 has done in Stock Hatch - 2 litre without those sort of limits just means Civic Type R's all round and that's dull
|
||
|
7 Aug 2006, 15:13 (Ref:1676667) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
Quote:
If there were 2 or 3 times as many cars in stock hatch you'd get more competition. Wouldn't be going any faster though |
||
|
7 Aug 2006, 15:16 (Ref:1676673) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,286
|
Quote:
But to be honest, there is very little difference these days between a Very competitive stockhatch car and a Modified class car. |
||
__________________
Cryos, thats me! To keep the national IQ higher, we prevent links in the signatures. Its clearly in the notice, but that doesn't stop some people moaning about it.. |
7 Aug 2006, 16:14 (Ref:1676720) | #6 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 34
|
To be perfectly honest, the BTRDA Super Modified is the step between the two classes im my opinion.
My budget is alot lower than those in the BRDA class, and the cost of converting my stockhatch to Modified was probably less than it costs to build a top Stockhatch. Running costs so far this year has been just my entry fees and petrol, same as running a Stockhatch, but without having to replace the panels after every meeting. Obvioulsy the initial set up with slick tyres, wets and wheels isnt cheap, but once purchased should last for a while. So why dont people convert to this class? Its certainly poorly supported at the minute, so a place for you to graduate too? |
||
|
7 Aug 2006, 19:43 (Ref:1676931) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 370
|
Hi Guys :
Just had to post this : We have been talking about 2lt 16v Stockhatch since 03 ! Would bring in many makes and models and very close racing! If this happened i would be back and racing at every meeting there was! As for weight limits they should be as 750 motor club , they are still quick and very close racing! How many drivers out there how are not driving at the moment would be back? See you all at Lydden. |
||
|
8 Aug 2006, 17:33 (Ref:1677757) | #8 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23
|
I can see no need for a 2L class. You will have the same problem as there is now. same cars dominating a class. It would just be know as the civic class. Why not improve on what you've already got. Weight limits are a good idea. Success ballast would slow the dominant cars down. You need to get the drivers back. The price of entry fees need to come down. AND THE RULES NEED TO BE POLICED PROPERLY!!
|
|
__________________
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional! |
8 Aug 2006, 21:55 (Ref:1677958) | #9 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,857
|
I am sure it was announced at the begining of the season that the BRDA were looking at introducing weight limits in 2007. I am not sure wether they are thinking of the Irish system, (one weight accross the board for all cars) or the 750 MC system (based on manufacturers kerb weights). I for one would prefer the 750 way. I think it would lead to more variaty of cars.
As for the introduction of a 'Super Stock Hatch' class, I'm not sure if the time is right. I think the cons out-weigh the pro's. Will it act as a stepping stone between Stocks and Supermods? I don't think so, 2.0 ltr Stockhatches will still be Stockhatches, ie, standard no modifications. A stepping stone class should allow some modifications. I think the Modified class that the BRDA tried a couple of years ago was a better idea, they just did not give it long enough to catch on. If you want to step up from Stock's to Supermod's As Asa says do the BTRDA series. Will it bring more variaty of models? I don't think so. I can see the one or two models being dominant, and some people will spend an arm and a leg building blueprinted engines, and I can see an influx of 1.9 205 gti's My final reason against it is, The competitor base is still not big enough. If we were getting 20+ Stockhatches entering the BRDA championship meetings fine, but we are not. I don't think the introduction of 2.0ltr Stock's would bring in many more competitors, it would just dilute the current classes even more. In the future a 2.0ltr class may be a good thing but IMHO not yet. |
|
__________________
Rallycross - The Best Motorsport In The World. |
9 Aug 2006, 10:01 (Ref:1678262) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 499
|
I think we could do with getting an official from the BRDA to confirm what is happening with the weight rules for next year as it will have an effect on who races in what classes and in what cars next year.
The 750mc limits seem to work very well from what i have seen with some very close and competative racing. There are plenty of different types of cars in the stock hatch class races which crowds like to see. I for one am already thinking of what i want to do next year and i'm sure other people have it in there minds too. Last edited by sihorton; 9 Aug 2006 at 10:05. |
||
__________________
superscooby from lancashire.. and yes we use gravy instead of racefuel up here. |
9 Aug 2006, 10:22 (Ref:1678273) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 553
|
Quote:
I know the Irish system of weights is not ideal but at least it went some way to addressing the crazy situation where some cars were up to 60 - 70 Kilos lighter than others and it is under review at the end of this season. You do need continuity of classes but you also need to be realistic about times moving on. I think what annoys most is when things get choped and changed and cars become obsolete overnight. I would sympathise with Chris. I think there are many drivers who have done all they want to in stock hatch and need a new challenge but are unwilling or unable to fork out for modified. As I have said before you might be able to build a cheap modified for less then a proposed Hot Hatch but a competitive hot hatch would cost a lot less than a competitive modified IMO. PS Silver do I detect that blue oval fever taking you over again!! leave the poor french biscut tins alone. I'm sure you wouldn't be complaining if there was a full grid of Henry's finest !!! |
||
|
9 Aug 2006, 18:06 (Ref:1678588) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,286
|
Quote:
Where have you been ?? |
||
__________________
Cryos, thats me! To keep the national IQ higher, we prevent links in the signatures. Its clearly in the notice, but that doesn't stop some people moaning about it.. |
9 Aug 2006, 22:45 (Ref:1678822) | #13 | ||||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,857
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That is why the 750mc's Stock Hatch championship is so succesful, very varied grids. If the BRDA adopted the 750mc's weight system, and applied the performance equalising rules that are already written in the rule book, we could have the same. |
||||
__________________
Rallycross - The Best Motorsport In The World. |
11 Aug 2006, 16:12 (Ref:1680098) | #14 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 89
|
Rally-cross, as a sport needs to move forward. The use of new more modern machinery needs to be allowed and encouraged. If this does not happen the sport will stagnate.
The main problem, as I see it, is if the rules are changed to disadvantage the eight valve 205-type cars a lot of competitors will be lost very quickly. A possible compromise could be the inception of a separate, additional stock-hatch class. This “super Stock-hatch” would be aimed at more modern 16valve cars. Engine size, 2ltr or 1600 ? Variable valve timing (Ban it ?) |
||
__________________
With a name this good who needs an alias |
11 Aug 2006, 18:48 (Ref:1680174) | #15 | |||||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,330
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
13 Aug 2006, 16:15 (Ref:1681320) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,286
|
If you did want to have a sub-class for older machinery I think the 750MC again have the right idea. They run a Class B title for older machinery (I think 1992 is the cut-off date). In rallycross it would be very straightforward to run a seperate Class B final if people wanted it.
Alternatively, you could have the MSA/BRDA stock hatch title as an open class (to include more modern machinery) and the BTRDA reserved for older Class B cars? This would mean you couldn't 'double up' so easily and run both series but it might be a logical division. But either way you have to have properly-policed weights... |
||
|
16 Aug 2006, 20:51 (Ref:1684527) | #17 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4
|
stock hatch class
what about if they kept the original stock hatch class and also included 1600 16v cars to allow saxo vts, 106 gti etc to be used but although they would race together they could have them in seperate class to make things fair!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel limits | Asa | Sportscar & GT Racing | 39 | 7 Oct 2004 23:13 |
Question over weight Limits | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 3 | 18 Jul 2003 02:57 |
Cart stocks up 25% | The Snout | ChampCar World Series | 28 | 30 Mar 2003 12:44 |
Speed Limits | racer69 | Road Car Forum | 30 | 19 Dec 2002 08:57 |