|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Jun 2011, 03:05 (Ref:2894876) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 690
|
Delta Wing Discussion ONLY
Roughly 13 months ago I suggested the ideas behind the Delta Wing come to sportscars
http://tentenths.com/forum/showpost....0&postcount=24 Now my wildest dream will come true http://www.motorward.com/2011/06/del...-2012-le-mans/ This car will win top speed on the Mulsanne at just 325 HP What do you think? Last edited by Bentley03; 5 May 2012 at 10:03. |
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 05:28 (Ref:2894889) | #2 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 50
|
Car has rear wheel steering
Try driving backwards at speed and see how well that works. Thrust SSC had rear wheel steering, but it didn't have to make the Arnarge corner. Front of car Has no room for front tunnel/ground effect generator. Has no room for front suspension. Rear of car Very little package for tunnel(s). Steering and power delivery to rear tires. Power/engine Can M-mike run a CoD study for 300hp and typical lemans speeds pls? where are the cooling ducts? Radiators? Air intake? Take a 300hp caterham and see if it can break 5minutes at lemans. We'll not be seeing a car resembeling a lawn dart this time next year, I wager. |
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 06:01 (Ref:2894892) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 981
|
Quote:
However, I do agree about the front aero... will they generate enough downforce with the underbody tunnels (again look at the rear view of the indycar proposal... big tunnels!) to negate the need for front wing? Last edited by Try Hard; 10 Jun 2011 at 06:19. |
|||
__________________
watch this space :) |
10 Jun 2011, 07:08 (Ref:2894911) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 593
|
I see a bigger problem: look at the width of those front wheels... combined they are about 1/3rd of the width of the frontwheels of other prototype cars! And less width=smaller contact patch with tarmac=less grip. No way they can steer this car through the various chicanes in anger. And I doubt as to wether the increased downforce the body of the car generates can make up for this.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 07:10 (Ref:2894912) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 280
|
I want to see how many rear corners are removed by clipping inside walls.. with the front being so much narrower than the rear I expect the drivers to misjudge where the back end is....
|
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 11:39 (Ref:2895032) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 12:38 (Ref:2895073) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 944
|
If they run the engine at Le Mans they were planning to in Indycars they'll run out of horsepower on the Mulsanne I'd reckon.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:19 (Ref:2895093) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
|
I think safety could be an issue. If a Delta wing center-punched a car like the #1 R18 did on Wednesday it could end up with some very unfortunate results.
It's also pretty unattractive, and you can't discount looks and mass appeal of any car. I a pretty positive, glass is half-full person when it comes to motor racing, but this thing is just....wrong. Rather than trying to re-invent the proverbial wheel, why not re-legalize ground effect tunnels for Prototypes, and limit the more drag-inducing external aero elements? You get better efficiency, better looks, and don't have to worry about all the stuff like fitting in a pit lane designed for normal cars, garages designed for normal cars, safety for other competitors, marshals, etc. Someone else mentioned this on the Midweek Motorsport forum, but the fact that the Mulsanne is fairly rutted, and the two rear wheels will be riding in the ruts and the front wheels on the crest of the road will promote a very unstable condition. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:20 (Ref:2895096) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,884
|
Oh yes, I'm sure the designers at Delta Wing have completely forgotten that Le Mans has corners, back to the drawing board for them I guess
Seriously guys, come on, why would they design a car that they think can't turn a sharp bend? |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:22 (Ref:2895097) | #10 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 385
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:29 (Ref:2895103) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
My question is why? What does this achieve?
My contempt is the money being spent by various groups of Americans, including the ALMS principle, when the money could be spent on a REAL entry, that could run LM and support the ALMS. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:34 (Ref:2895106) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
As for the Sausagemobile, well, it's an interesting concept. Low weight, low drag, low horsepower. Ok, that's about all the positive things I have to say about this thing. The 56th car "reserves" are a lot more interesting technologically (although they perhaps may not be as fast) and I'm sure they will look a lot better. I don't usually wish failure upon racing teams, but let's hope this thing never hits the track. It's hideous and I also wonder about the safety of this thing. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:38 (Ref:2895108) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
|
I wonder who in the motorsport community will be the first to mention that the emperor is wearing no clothes? I can't imagine the paddock is full of enthusiasm for this thing.
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:42 (Ref:2895110) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,884
|
Tell you what I'm fed up with in motorsport, is leaders of bizarre projects such as these who tell us what they think the fans want.
The Delta Wing crew clearly have no idea what we're after. I want racing cars that look like racing cars and sound like racing cars. They could run on nail clippings for all I care - so long as the sound is there. That's what most of us want. This looks like something which might go for the land speed record, not victory at Le Mans. It's ridiculous. Endurance racing will lose a lot of its true fans very quickly if cars begin to look like this. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:49 (Ref:2895115) | #15 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 305
|
What the hell is this project about. In my opinion this car has no place at LM! And shouldn't the prototypes look rectangular from above and with the front wheels being in the same place as the rear wheels?... Thought that was one of the design rules for LMP?...
No this just look like one of those kiddy racers which should be left as miniatures to play with... This car doesn't fit in sportscar racing in my eyes. |
||
__________________
Supporting Aston Martin and Corvette in the GT2 (sorry GT1 :( ) |
10 Jun 2011, 13:50 (Ref:2895117) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
Quote:
I'm not a complete stickler for aesthetic racing cars. I'm ok with some unattractive elements of cars if they are there to improve performance. That is the name of the game after all. This thing, however, is the answer to a question that nobody asked. EDIT: Remember, this thing very well may take the spot of a potential class winning GTE car or a decent LMP. Ugh. |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 13:51 (Ref:2895118) | #17 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Supporting Aston Martin and Corvette in the GT2 (sorry GT1 :( ) |
10 Jun 2011, 13:55 (Ref:2895121) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
|
Yes, the first thing I thought when I saw the Delta Wing was "That looks like something an 8 year old would draw on his notebook when bored in history class!"
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 14:24 (Ref:2895142) | #19 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
So may be to gain more credibility they've switched to front steer, only I'm guessing if they have they've not figured out how to do it yet. The under model has no cut outs for steering movement and even if it did I can't imagine how you package a pair of wishbones, springs, dampers and a rack is such a narrow package. I can't see the packaging it especially considering the lock required to negotiate chicanes and Arnarge. The closest thing to delta wing I can think of is the Honda F1 land speed car. Really light, no wings but big power. I'm thinking this project is like Delorian, tax payers beware. (government funding for green energy research) |
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 14:39 (Ref:2895152) | #20 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 385
|
||
|
10 Jun 2011, 14:45 (Ref:2895156) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,456
|
This thing looks like a sidecar attached to an F1 rear !
Spaceballs, here we come |
|
__________________
The advantage of cleverness is that you can play dumb. The opposite is way tougher - Kurt Tucholsky Just because you're breathing, doesn't mean you're alive - Steve 'Stavros' Parrish |
10 Jun 2011, 14:52 (Ref:2895160) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
What's most laughable is the, "That monstrosity doesn't belong in my Le Mans!" posts. Maybe you could turn to spec racing to keep the ugly little things out, then. Le Mans is perfect for the Delta Wing. I find it hilarious some of you are so scared by this little thing. I could understand it from the open wheel crowd, where the cars and the technology hasn't been revolutionized as much as evolved. But from the sportscar crowd? With the open rules and vast diversity of cars in the field? Good god. You'll still get your throaty V8's and your singing V10's. FFS, if you don't like it, just ignore it.
|
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 14:54 (Ref:2895161) | #23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
I don't know about that. There are many contenders for the LMP2 win. A reduction in entries could have left one of those contenders off. I think more than 6 or 7 cars have a shot at the GTE-Pro win much less the GTE-Am win. Last year the Lieb/Lietz Porsche started off on the reserve list as well as the Fisi AF Corse 430. It would have been a real shame not to have those cars, but fortunately those entries got in because some GT1s did not make it.
|
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 14:55 (Ref:2895162) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,217
|
I'm confused as to how close you could be when reading multiple links with interviews with the designers no mention was ever made of it having been a 3 wheeler at any point. In fact they mentioned a couple time that the tight front dimensions made packaging the front suspension was a no-brainer return to dual wishbones with spring and dampers between them. And since the suspension is internal, the components could be built purely for maximum strength without aero needs to compromise design; they referred to both thin-walled round tubing or milled aluminum I-beam designs. It sounds like they have made rolling chassis and have tested the car in a rolling road wind tunnel with Firestone who have developed new fronts (4" wide custom molded) and re-purposed rears (Indy Lights front tires). At the very least Firestone has load tested the tires they developed for the car so far and are comfortable with putting the tires on a track safely.
http://www.gordonkirby.com/categorie..._is_no238.html was posted earlier this year in response to Indy, not sportscars but think the information still applies. And no I'm not a fan of the design, and not sure it would work for multi-class racing and almost positive it will take some adjustment for drivers to remember the rear width. |
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:01 (Ref:2895167) | #25 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 385
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wide Front Wing / Narrow rear wing | browney | Formula One | 30 | 21 Nov 2011 12:13 |
Delta S4's that were in Rallycross | M.Lowe | Rallying & Rallycross | 23 | 30 Aug 2007 11:47 |
Delta wing , inverted delta wing | effuno | Racing Technology | 3 | 8 Apr 2007 13:45 |