|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 May 2000, 18:40 (Ref:6069) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 211
|
When an Indy car can run flat out through all four corners at Indianapolis because it doesn't have the horsepower to pull the downforce, the NASCAR equivalent is restrictor plate racing. Except in NASCAR it's illegal to back off on the downforce to the point where the car is just as likely as not to spin going through a corner.
|
||
|
22 May 2000, 22:27 (Ref:6070) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 9,208
|
Restrictor plate racing is so popular though, isn't it?
|
||
|
23 May 2000, 15:33 (Ref:6071) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 211
|
NASCAR when they can avoids restrictor plates like the plague.
Not killing spectators is the only reason they mandate them at tracks such as Daytona and Talladega. |
||
|
23 May 2000, 16:39 (Ref:6072) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 1998
Posts: 2,762
|
The IRL reduced available horsepower through displacement limits at 3.5 liters from 4.0 liters. They also mandate a minimum wickerbill or gurney flap at Indy.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Restrictor Question | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 1 Jun 2004 18:07 |
2004 Restrictor Regs | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 2 | 23 Oct 2003 16:49 |
Letter to ACO about M3 restrictor issues | Fogelhund | ACO Regulated Series | 35 | 12 Jun 2003 12:40 |
restrictor plate tracks? | 24thunder | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 11 | 17 Feb 2003 08:30 |
Indy Racing | Craig | Announcements and Feedback | 24 | 1 Feb 2002 20:37 |