|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Jan 2006, 00:12 (Ref:1503467) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
|
Panoz In Wind Tunnel!!
http://www.champcarworldseries.com/N...le.asp?ID=9915
And it looks better than in the original drawings. |
||
__________________
"My Maserati does one-eighty-five, I lost my licence, Now I don't drive" -Joe Walsh |
18 Jan 2006, 00:27 (Ref:1503471) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 662
|
Wow that's a good looking car. Looks like everything is going well in getting the chassis ready for its debut next year. Here's hoping everything goes well.
J.D. |
||
|
18 Jan 2006, 00:39 (Ref:1503475) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,064
|
It certainly looks better than in the drawings. However, I still think that the nose cone stops too high which makes the front of the car look, not messy, but just unsophisticated.
|
||
__________________
RIP Dan Wheldon, 1978-2011. 2005 & 2011 Indy 500 champion, 2005 Indycar champion RIP Marco Simoncelli, 1987-2011. 2008 250cc champion |
18 Jan 2006, 03:22 (Ref:1503507) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 996
|
I agree. The nose is a bit high. I would prefer a lower pointed nose like that of the current Lola, but it helps with the downforce without creating turbulence, so I guess it's necessary.
The rest of the car looks killer! |
||
|
18 Jan 2006, 03:37 (Ref:1503515) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Agreed it really does look great. I'm looking forward to when it hits the track.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
18 Jan 2006, 08:34 (Ref:1503593) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
I was not able to see the picture. Can someone post the picture on this thread?
Thanks! Amar |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
18 Jan 2006, 10:48 (Ref:1503653) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Seems someone got cold feet and pulled it. Figures. Would have been nice to see what it looked like.
|
|
|
18 Jan 2006, 21:15 (Ref:1504013) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
I saw an image of it in a news item on SpeedTV's site...
Try there... I like the looks of it... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
18 Jan 2006, 21:31 (Ref:1504027) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 689
|
|||
__________________
Congratulations Kimi! |
18 Jan 2006, 22:32 (Ref:1504066) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Thanks for the heads up. Not sure what to think of it myself - looks a bit too much like the myriad of open-wheel cars in Europe, to be honest. Champ Cars have always had something special to them, something rough. Something American.
That said, if the new car does indeed improve passing (I'm still in believe-it-when-I-see-it-mode on that one), I'm all for it. |
|
|
18 Jan 2006, 22:59 (Ref:1504090) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Nice looking machine. The rear wing is quite-noticably smaller, I guess it's a necessary evil when balancing it against sponsor space.
Surprised me to read that it's being tested at a Penske facility. Why would that be? |
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
18 Jan 2006, 23:43 (Ref:1504121) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Quote:
Just wondering...not meant as a jab at out, rustyfan... |
|||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
19 Jan 2006, 01:30 (Ref:1504142) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
it does look nice, good change-
but doesn't the angle of the pushrods for the front Suspension look a little steep? and doesn't the car look rather frail now compared to the Lola and Reynards of old? oh and Tim-i think he meant the UK built Lolas "looked american" as these were much porkier looking |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
19 Jan 2006, 07:26 (Ref:1504211) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,419
|
Quote:
Ah well, it doesn't matter - Champ Car has abandoned most of its American heritage already anyway, so the new car is just another step in that process. |
||
|
19 Jan 2006, 07:49 (Ref:1504213) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Oops |
19 Jan 2006, 07:51 (Ref:1504214) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
Well the thing that is most glaring to me about the Panoz is how it really doesn't look like the IRL cars. That new nose really makes a difference.
To me, in addition to being sleeker than the current Lola, it still retains an American menacing look with that separation between the nose and wings. Those forks make the car look meaner than the Lola. And with the manufacturer being American, I think that Champ Car is going back to its American roots! I can't wait for the Panoz to show its teeth at the July tests! |
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
19 Jan 2006, 14:10 (Ref:1504451) | #17 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 341
|
the side view from the champcar site.
http://www.champcarworldseries.com/c...0117P_0002.jpg Looks good. |
||
__________________
. |
19 Jan 2006, 19:34 (Ref:1504652) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
It doesn't look too bad. It reminds me of the Penske PC27, which I loved, even though it didn't win a single race. The DP01 looks like a compressed version of that Penske.
I'm just glad it looks a hell of a lot better than the first drawing that was shown. |
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
19 Jan 2006, 19:35 (Ref:1504653) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
Oh yeah, baby... I can't wait!
|
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
31 Jan 2006, 01:52 (Ref:1512397) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 813
|
Have they changed the high cockpit sides since the previous blueprints?
The first pictures I saw made me wonder how the driver could see anything out of his cockpit apart from directly straight ahead. This version however seems to have opened the cockpit up again slightly. |
||
|
31 Jan 2006, 20:37 (Ref:1513000) | #21 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9
|
The car looks like a Champ Car from the front wheels on back. But something still irks me about the front wing.
|
||
|
1 Feb 2006, 15:53 (Ref:1513579) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,065
|
I think we need to see a full-scale model or an actual prototype. At least with the mock-up, they kept those spoked wheels.
|
||
__________________
Cuz trucks need love, too! |
1 Feb 2006, 16:08 (Ref:1513590) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 952
|
I might be able to explain the front!
A little bird told me that the designers of the Champcar Panoz are former Williams F1 designers! Maybe something to do with the raised nose? |
||
|
1 Feb 2006, 16:47 (Ref:1513611) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
well the raised nose in formula cars to my understanding is to allow more usable front wing area as (in F1 and the F3000-have plank flat undertrays) where Champcar has always had underfloor tunnels to produce downforce in addition to the front wing -which is why the nose has alway been lower and (ala reynard) had the wing incorporated closer to it- even the lola of last years fame had a low nose- but it seemed to be rising to get that 'formula' look to the cars...for what?
now with underflor tunnels and a rasied nose how much more down force are they really making? |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind Tunnel Costs? | JulianF | Racing Technology | 22 | 7 Apr 2006 14:46 |
PT on Wind Tunnel tonight | Dov | ChampCar World Series | 3 | 19 Feb 2004 06:26 |
PT on Wind Tunnel tonight | Dov | ChampCar World Series | 11 | 30 Oct 2003 00:55 |
Gentilozzi On Wind Tunnel | muggle not | ChampCar World Series | 18 | 30 Sep 2003 15:01 |