|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
27 Nov 2008, 21:54 (Ref:2342974) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,789
|
Could Supertouring be a possibility today?
I was looking at the article on Flash Engineering shaking down their Volvo S40 on TcT and though to myself. S2000 has been around for almost 7 years, about the same lifespan as its predecessors group A and Supertouring. And I thought, could Supertouring be reintroduced today with some form of cost cutting? Quite an interesting disscussion point I thought.
|
||
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?' |
27 Nov 2008, 21:59 (Ref:2342977) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
I'm not a tech-guy, but maybe we should first identify the differences between STC and S2000 and then check them one by one.
|
||
|
27 Nov 2008, 22:05 (Ref:2342980) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 168
|
I thought, that the main reason to introduce S-2000 was reducing costs. So It's just cheaper version of ST. Am I wrong?
|
|
|
28 Nov 2008, 01:13 (Ref:2343067) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,919
|
S2000 was a cheaper version of ST. However, I feel that ST was more successful than S2000 currently is in the same amount of time.
It's hard to explain why. The more difficult global/financial challenges? Too many racing series? It's understandable and reasonable--but I feel that b/c of the tougher economic times, every manufacturer would only race/support a race series that they will win at. So globally, you have a bunch of series with only a few manufacturers/cars in each. In an "ideal" racing world, you'll have manufacturers/cars in every country racing to the same championship rules. In some countries, the cars will do better, some other countries, no so well. The other challenge that seems to be occuring is that one manufacturer spends $2M, another $4M and say another spends $10M. While money is no guarantee for success, it seems that the 2M budget manufacturer complains and gets rules breaks so that it will competetive against a manufacturer spending $10M. |
||
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever... |
28 Nov 2008, 01:35 (Ref:2343073) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
The current problem with the S2000 cars, is that it costs a fortune to get those last tenths out of them. The engines doesnt have the torque or the strength, the same with the suspension, you need precious parts.
The same thing with the rest of the car, it is still to much a production car. |
||
__________________
Le Mans Christian Bakkerud, Team Kolles Formula Renault 2.0 NEC Mikkel Mac DTC Martin Marrill, M-Sport |
28 Nov 2008, 06:11 (Ref:2343113) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,919
|
Quote:
OTOH, does the average fan care how showroom or standard the car is? |
|||
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever... |
28 Nov 2008, 08:06 (Ref:2343131) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,087
|
I think its essential the cars look production based so fans can relate to the brand image, Super touring was expensive on two fronts, cars as mentioned but also the drivers it attrached being paid high wages.
Running the cars now with cost measures introduced proberbly would work, the current BTCC cars are ok but could do with more power. |
|
|
28 Nov 2008, 08:48 (Ref:2343147) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,977
|
Quote:
ST, although in theory production based, allowed what were in effect custom build race parts. These were more expensive to start with but less prone to breaking and relatively less expensive to develop. For example one the reasons Class 2/ST allowed sequential gearboxes was that it was cheaper to buy an off the shelf racing 'box and fit inside a new casing than it was to develop a road car 'box able to cope with the demands of racing. |
||
|
28 Nov 2008, 10:41 (Ref:2343185) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,301
|
One thing is for sure though, is that S2000 cars are far more reliable overall than the ST cars of old.
|
||
|
28 Nov 2008, 11:18 (Ref:2343206) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
The griplevel is also vastly improved, compared to a ST car, I am told.
|
||
__________________
Le Mans Christian Bakkerud, Team Kolles Formula Renault 2.0 NEC Mikkel Mac DTC Martin Marrill, M-Sport |
28 Nov 2008, 13:03 (Ref:2343246) | #11 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,615
|
Far more reliable, according to who?
As for the grip-level, the ST cars had narrower tyres but a lot more downforce, what kind of grip do you mean? |
||
|
28 Nov 2008, 14:17 (Ref:2343287) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
Quote:
Could just be down to a modern suspension? |
|||
__________________
Le Mans Christian Bakkerud, Team Kolles Formula Renault 2.0 NEC Mikkel Mac DTC Martin Marrill, M-Sport |
28 Nov 2008, 15:14 (Ref:2343328) | #13 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,323
|
Suspension and tyres have moved on - you're talking 10 years of progress in both areas.
|
||
|
28 Nov 2008, 15:26 (Ref:2343332) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,706
|
Quote:
What would be an improvement for touringcarracing is that they should be harder to drive fast. When you have a car that is 1 second slower, but a fantastic driver can win 1 second on drivingskills versus a good driver, it makes sense to hire the fantastic driver. And that's the one I'd like to see. Nowadays (so I've heard) the cars are much easier to drive compared to ST-cars. Another thing that is alright to a certain level, but could be improved still, is the mixture of several formats and tracks for the championships. There are offcourse already twisty tracks and slow tracks, and also the weatherconditions are different for other races, but the WTCC, and maybe also the other championships could do with an endurancerace or 2, so that not only the fastest car wins all the races, but cars with a low fuelconsumption or tirewear have a chance asswell. This may especially be nice in national championships where there isn't a lot of variety in tracks, although otoh the extra costs and the physical ability of the average driver might be a bigger problem over there. |
|||
|
28 Nov 2008, 22:50 (Ref:2343586) | #15 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Yeah, 1-2 endurance races per year, would be both good to watch and for sure lower maintenance costs for S2000 cars as well (ensuring cardesigns would be less close to the limit so they can last a full endurance race).
|
|
|
29 Nov 2008, 03:43 (Ref:2343677) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,919
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Supertouring Forever and Ever... |
29 Nov 2008, 11:02 (Ref:2343753) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,153
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
29 Nov 2008, 14:21 (Ref:2343833) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,977
|
Quote:
Back then fleet sales were a huge part of the UK market. If you had a company car you paid tax on it, and generally the rate of tax was determined by the size of the engine. 2.0l was at the top end of the most common tax band. There was no (tax) benefit having a 1.8 and anything larger than 2.0 put you into a higher tax band, so 2.0 became the most popular seller. The details would have been different in other European countries but the principal was similar. These days fewer people drive company cars and tax rules have changed so a lot of manufacturers sell more 1.8l or 2.2l cars. I guess the advantage of sticking with 2.0 now is that even if you don't build a 2.0 model it's relatively easy to bore out a 1.8 or sleeve down a 2.2 to suit. If you went to 2.5 it's unlikely you could use a 1.8 block and expect it to work, which potentially rules out more manufacturers. |
||
|
29 Nov 2008, 14:36 (Ref:2343839) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,301
|
Quote:
I remember attending BTCC races throughout 1997 - 1999, and there would always be one or two cars retire through engine problems. I cant remember the last time a leading S2000 car failed in the WTCC, probably one of the SEAT TDi's, but as they are new tech thats bound to occur I guess. |
|||
|
29 Nov 2008, 17:18 (Ref:2343893) | #20 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,863
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Nov 2008, 20:15 (Ref:2343974) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 682
|
Quote:
I was/am a big fan of Supertouring, the cars were brilliant, but am I the only one that thinks S2000 produces much better races more consistently? Yes there were great races, Donington '98 spring to mind, but there could be some real processions, even Murray Walker mentioned in one of his books that ST races could be as boring as Formula 1. If S2000 had the same Manufacturer support as ST, had the same amount of National series using it as ST did and only allowed 3 box cars to be homologated (I can't stand the hatchbacks), I would have to say of the two, that I prefer S2000... |
|||
__________________
Taki Inoue, the only driver in F1 history who's been driven into by a course car, twice! |
29 Nov 2008, 20:55 (Ref:2343986) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Nov 2008, 21:18 (Ref:2343992) | #23 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,863
|
I don't Eurosports involvement blocks other channels (e.g. BBC, ITV) to cover WTCC. In Holland RTL is covering WTCC. German ZDF covered a few years the German round. I don't know about other countries.
Last edited by FIRE; 29 Nov 2008 at 21:20. |
|
|
29 Nov 2008, 21:28 (Ref:2343993) | #24 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,961
|
Quote:
Yes I remember that appearance on A Question of Sport - to be honest I thought the other 5 participants were a bit bemused and hadn't a clue who this guy was!! The thing I found most entertaining about Super Touring car's was the actual noise they made - they sounded like a 'real' racing car. The S2000 cars (and to a larger extent the BTC spec cars) have this cringeworthy pop when changing gears.. Although to the original question - could ST work today - doubt it. Look at the privateer input there has been especially in domestic championships - and for the better in my eyes. |
||
|
29 Nov 2008, 21:55 (Ref:2344013) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 682
|
Quote:
I would suggest Eurosport do something radical, pay major broadcasters around Europe (RTL (Germany, Netherlands) RAI, TF1 (easy as they own Eurosport), BBC, ect...) to show an hour long WTCC highlight show early on a Sunday evening the week following a meeting. They should make them put a good effort into it like they would for something like F1. The next year they should do the same thing but ask for a small fee, then increase the price of the rights year by year if popularity is sustained or increases. |
|||
__________________
Taki Inoue, the only driver in F1 history who's been driven into by a course car, twice! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SuperTouring Vs New BTCC | ADnet | Touring Car Racing | 13 | 5 Jun 2003 08:14 |
SuperTouring web site | supertouring | Cool Sites | 10 | 15 May 2003 15:42 |
BMW 3 series (Supertouring) | alesi95 | Motorsport History | 1 | 27 Jun 2002 12:24 |