Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > IRL Indycar Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 Jan 2007, 15:57 (Ref:1823872)   #1
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
New Rules for 2007

http://tentenths.com/forum/newthread...newthread&f=43

An interesting list of changes. Going back to the 3.5L engine is surprising, but I suppose it should allow them to run very low revs and have the engines survive for a long time.

I'm not sure what the rules were in 2006 with respect to front wing angles on short ovals and road courses. I thought in the past they mandated rear wing angles for each track.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 23 Jan 2007, 16:54 (Ref:1823902)   #2
Xpunk75
Racer
 
Xpunk75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
United States
Detroit
Posts: 294
Xpunk75 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I suspect this has something to do with Honda and their deterating relationship with the IRL.
Xpunk75 is offline  
__________________
The Best Racing I've Ever Seen IndyCar 1979 - 1995.
Old 24 Jan 2007, 07:09 (Ref:1824355)   #3
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It's just relates to IRL's intention to reduce costs for entrants.The longer the duration of the engine, the lower the costs; not very difficult of a question.
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Old 24 Jan 2007, 10:10 (Ref:1824450)   #4
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,195
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by climb
It's just relates to IRL's intention to reduce costs for entrants.The longer the duration of the engine, the lower the costs; not very difficult of a question.
I'm not that sure. The total costs depends on both the production and development costs.
Pingguest is offline  
Old 24 Jan 2007, 10:13 (Ref:1824455)   #5
climb
Veteran
 
climb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
St Pierre and Miquelon
closer than you thought!
Posts: 4,512
climb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridclimb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yes, but the engines are the previous ones, therefore there are no development costs connected with this choice.
climb is offline  
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly
P.Simon
Old 24 Jan 2007, 22:24 (Ref:1825215)   #6
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the 3.0L engines use the same block as the 3.5Ls? I thought they did a kind of patch work solution where they just reduced the stroke?
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 24 Jan 2007, 23:10 (Ref:1825262)   #7
drewdawg727
Veteran
 
drewdawg727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
United States
New York
Posts: 865
drewdawg727 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the griddrewdawg727 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't know if it's just me but that link that you provided isn't working for me, it's a link for constructing a new thread.
drewdawg727 is offline  
__________________
"Be good to your friends; for if it weren't for them, you'd be a total stranger!"
Old 31 Jan 2007, 20:06 (Ref:1830541)   #8
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
^ Sorry, it's everywhere now though. Check on SpeedTV.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DMN 2007 - rules, regs, drivers, cars. (Formerly DTRC) Tim Wilkinson National & Club Racing 1021 23 Nov 2007 08:14
2007 rules david_james2000 Formula One 31 27 Sep 2004 21:22
I know already...rules again Lotusonpole Formula One 34 25 Aug 2004 16:55
New Rules macdaddy ChampCar World Series 12 22 Jun 2002 06:18


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:29.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.