|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
27 Oct 2005, 08:28 (Ref:1444834) | #51 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
The FIA diagram's been put out to get a debate among the experts on how to achieve the aims of aiding overtaking - I doubt it was ever intended to be definitive
|
|
|
27 Oct 2005, 08:57 (Ref:1444855) | #52 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
|
Well, its a little more than a diagram. The FIA have done some R+D too. I think the thrust of Gary's argument is that their suggested proposals are based on analysis which is of the level of "the work of a first year computer student". This is a direct quote from page 7 of Autosport this week. As is always the case, teams will not agree anything, and have to be dictated to. Gary seems to be saying that the dictation should be done on the basis of more professional and thorough studies.
Somebody else in Autosport "a senior technical source" [whatever that means] has said that when a car pulls out to overtake, they will hit the wake of those side wings and probably crash ! Whatever, I guess it keeps us on 10-10ths talking crap for the winter doesn't it. |
|
|
27 Oct 2005, 14:22 (Ref:1445134) | #53 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 330
|
I was reading a performance magazine today while my volvo was in surgery in the garage. There was an ad about nitrogen. It made me wonder what kind of air is being used now in F1 and other series also - and what would the difference be on track between nitrogen and regular old air being used? I presume that is governed by a Rule too as to whether or not either could be used?
|
||
|
27 Oct 2005, 17:30 (Ref:1445298) | #54 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 377
|
bog standard air. blueberry flavour will be the next change
|
||
__________________
I'm semi evil, i'm quasi evil. I am the Diet Coke of evil. just one calorie, not evil enough. |
27 Oct 2005, 17:40 (Ref:1445313) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
|
Quote:
|
||
|
27 Oct 2005, 17:52 (Ref:1445329) | #56 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 377
|
no, you're techincally right.
|
||
__________________
I'm semi evil, i'm quasi evil. I am the Diet Coke of evil. just one calorie, not evil enough. |
27 Oct 2005, 18:45 (Ref:1445366) | #57 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 330
|
Thanks!
|
||
|
28 Oct 2005, 15:38 (Ref:1446129) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 605
|
Williams will be even happier with there timing switching to Bridgestone then
|
||
__________________
What's this for anyway? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No radical wing for 2007 | Stargazer7 | Formula One | 38 | 7 Dec 2005 16:39 |
rear wing | fetus | Road Car Forum | 2 | 7 Dec 2004 16:13 |
New rear wing test. | Adam43 | Formula One | 14 | 20 Aug 2004 09:38 |
New Audi Rear wing | Try Hard | Sportscar & GT Racing | 29 | 12 Apr 2004 15:21 |
BAR weird rear wing | Nicholas | Formula One | 14 | 21 Apr 2002 10:02 |