Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 Jan 2008, 13:31 (Ref:2113354)   #26
F360
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 151
F360 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Do any set of proposed rules cater for someone to add turbochargers (as an off the top of the head example !) to say, a 430 to allow one to run in GT1 ?

Can't seem to find definitive regs for 2009 and on that clarifies that....
F360 is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2008, 14:39 (Ref:2113386)   #27
chunterer
Race Official
Veteran
 
chunterer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Now about halfway down my road!
Posts: 15,949
chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!chunterer is going for a new world record!
Interesting question but I took the 'new' GT1 as to cater for normally aspirated cars with engines bigger than 5.5 litres? Have I missed something out?

On the subject of Fiat's sportscar activities. I thought that there would be either a new Ferrari or Maserati based GT1 contender with the 430 being replaced by the Alfa 8C as a GT2 esque level car?

I don't see tham bothering with LMP stuff really.
chunterer is offline  
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?"
"No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!"
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2008, 14:44 (Ref:2113389)   #28
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by F360
Do any set of proposed rules cater for someone to add turbochargers (as an off the top of the head example !) to say, a 430 to allow one to run in GT1 ?

Can't seem to find definitive regs for 2009 and on that clarifies that....
Those wont be out untill Dec of 2008.

Look at teh ACO rules for for 2008 regs: http://www.lemans.org/sport/sport/re...4hauto_gb.html

Art. 5.5 GT1 at this time.

5.4 - Normally aspirated engines :
5.4.1 - Displacement : 8 000 cc maximum.

5.5 - Turbocharged / Supercharged engines :
5.5.1 - Displacement : 4 000 cc maximum.

However, just taking a car designed under the GT2 regs, putting a turbo on and racing in GT1 would not work. That particular car needs to be built that way with 50 or more units built with that turbo for commercial sale. IIRC


2008 & 2009 regs are very close, with the big changes in 2010. Full details still being worked out.

Remember last Dec the World Motorsports Counsel and the Manufactures in GT racing rejected SRO's ideas.

Last edited by AU N EGL; 25 Jan 2008 at 14:48.
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2008, 15:52 (Ref:2113422)   #29
F360
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 151
F360 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thank you AU N EGL,
Just the info I was looking for.

I guess my question stemmed from looking at how Aston Martin now have DB9 variants in GT1, GT2 and GT3.
So, in THEORY (I stress THEORY !), it could be done, albeit with some serious development...
Maserati didn't seem to have too much trouble shifting 40-odd road going examples of the MC12, and I guess there are likely to be 50 plus eager Ferrari collectors who'd jump at the chance of a "Super-430".

I still can't see a factory blessed 599 happening although the Alfa 8C might, as previously mentioned - remember that the 8C is built at Maserati.

From a personal point of view, I'd love to see a proper LMP1 Ferrari - I just don't think thats ever gonna happen either..
F360 is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2008, 16:04 (Ref:2113429)   #30
PorscheFanNo1
Veteran
 
PorscheFanNo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Sweden
Winner's Circle
Posts: 1,484
PorscheFanNo1 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridPorscheFanNo1 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
Those wont be out untill Dec of 2008.

Look at teh ACO rules for for 2008 regs: http://www.lemans.org/sport/sport/re...4hauto_gb.html

Art. 5.5 GT1 at this time.

5.4 - Normally aspirated engines :
5.4.1 - Displacement : 8 000 cc maximum.

5.5 - Turbocharged / Supercharged engines :
5.5.1 - Displacement : 4 000 cc maximum.

However, just taking a car designed under the GT2 regs, putting a turbo on and racing in GT1 would not work. That particular car needs to be built that way with 50 or more units built with that turbo for commercial sale. IIRC


2008 & 2009 regs are very close, with the big changes in 2010. Full details still being worked out.

Remember last Dec the World Motorsports Counsel and the Manufactures in GT racing rejected SRO's ideas.
But the big difference is in the air restrictors. A turbo engine is not competetive against NA engines under FIA rules. When FIA took over after BPR in 97 they decreased the air restrictors for turbo cars both in GT1 and GT2, Porsche estimated they lost about 50hp by that. At LeMans however ACO did not follow FIA so they could run the same old bigger restrictors, and they won. This still 10 years later are embedded in the FIA rules and a Turbo car will still be about 50hp down (at least) on the NA cars.
PorscheFanNo1 is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2008, 17:08 (Ref:2113478)   #31
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by AU N EGL
Arn not the Maseratis built in the same plant as the Ferrari's? So the money would come from Ferrari, to Maserati's budget?
It was stated a while ago Ferrari would concentrate on F1.

Both brands can accomodate smaller GT2 type projects, but if ever the Fiat Group went for an overall Le Mans win, I'm certain it would be with the Maserati brand.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Jan 2008, 17:21 (Ref:2113492)   #32
AU N EGL
Veteran
 
AU N EGL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
United States
Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 4,418
AU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAU N EGL should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by PorscheFanNo1
But the big difference is in the air restrictors. A turbo engine is not competetive against NA engines under FIA rules. When FIA took over after BPR in 97 they decreased the air restrictors for turbo cars both in GT1 and GT2, Porsche estimated they lost about 50hp by that. At LeMans however ACO did not follow FIA so they could run the same old bigger restrictors, and they won. This still 10 years later are embedded in the FIA rules and a Turbo car will still be about 50hp down (at least) on the NA cars.
Correct O Mundo
AU N EGL is offline  
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASCAR Car of the Future Plans kingfloopy NASCAR & Stock Car Racing 24 18 Jan 2006 10:31
PI Future plans revealed inpitlane Australasian Touring Cars. 14 26 Nov 2005 06:54
TC's plans for the future... retro Australasian Touring Cars. 17 17 Aug 2004 03:33
PG's Plans for Future of OWRS ?!?! zerO ChampCar World Series 19 9 Jan 2004 16:30
Future Plans racer69 Australasian Touring Cars. 9 12 Jun 2001 17:35


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.