|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
28 Jun 2000, 16:25 (Ref:19983) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 482
|
Brands Hatch cleared another major hurdle in its bid to bring the 2002 British Grand Prix back to Kent when its planning application was passed by Sevenoaks District Council last night (Monday).
After a four-hour meeting, the council’s Development Control Sub-committee voted 12 to six in favour of allowing Brands Hatch Leisure to modify the layout of its existing Grand Prix circuit and to build a new pits complex, media centre and several new grandstands to meet the requirements of the FIA, motorsport’s governing body. However, since the development is on greenbelt land, final approval must come from the Secretary of State for the Environment, John Prescott, before work can commence. Sources say that this may not be a formality: although BHL, which has a six-year contract and an option for a further five years, has calculated that the Grand Prix will bring in excess of £30 million and 3000 temporary jobs to Kent every year, opponents argue that this is to the detriment of the area around Silverstone in Northants, the present location of the race. It is understood that a letter was sent by the Secretary of State’s office to Sevenoaks District Council prior to the meeting stressing that the council did not have the right to grant final permission. However, should the Secretary of State veto the application – and a decision is expected within a month - BHL’s contract allows it to place the race at the location of its choice. Opponents of the scheme argued that the development and the running of a Grand Prix would bring increased noise, traffic chaos and the destruction of several hectares of ancient woodland. However, proponents of the scheme, and BHL itself, argued that in return for three ‘noisy days’ – the Grand Prix meeting itself – the circuit would have more days with zero track activity than ever before, and that it would be more accountable to the local community through the setting up of a number of working groups with the power to take the circuit to court over any non-compliance issues. Councillor Edward Quaife, vice-chairman of the committee and proposer of the application, said: "Yes, Brands Hatch is in a green belt, but its very presence is a special circumstance. The British Grand Prix is an event we should all be proud to have here once again. "In return for three days of Formula 1, we as a council have increased control for the rest of the year. We can learn from our past problems and take a pro-active and positive stance. And with the expected turnover from Formula 1, BHL will have more than enough money to honour its commitments." Rob Bain, chief executive of BHL, said: "We have carried out an exhaustive consulting process with the council, the local community and wildlife organisations and we believe our plan delivers major benefits to the community." Despite several leading Formula 1 teams stressing the need for up to 60 days of testing at the track, Sevenoaks District Council confirmed that no extra testing would be allowed under the terms of the agreement. The scale of the re-development means that up to 15 hectares of woodland will be lost within the Brands Hatch site. However, BHL is committed to planting 40 hectares of replacement trees on several sites in the local area, including approximately eight hectares at Brands Hatch itself. Anti-noise measures proposed in the scheme include the building of a noise-retaining wall around the Grand Prix loop and strategic tree-planting around the site. BHL says it will also offer to buy the houses of residents nearest to the circuit at twice the market price and fit triple-glazing to properties most affected by the scheme. |
||
|
28 Jun 2000, 23:33 (Ref:20082) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,964
|
Sorry to be ever cynical, but I think it's those councillor's pockets which were heard jangling with ££££, not the people of Kent's.
Silverstone losing the race is a major loss. |
||
|
29 Jun 2000, 07:20 (Ref:20180) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,211
|
I can understand why they approved it... but I shall be interested to hear what Mr Prescott has to say about the whole affair.
I don't think he'll refuse it, but he may make this the big stand against 'Green Belt' development... we shall have to see.. As for me, if it's approved I may actually be going to my first GP for 15 years... but then again we all lose Dingle Dell!!!! Sob.... |
||
|
12 Jul 2000, 13:56 (Ref:22763) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 482
|
Time for an update...
Brands Hatch not out of the woods yet? A leading environmental group has called on the government to say no to Brands Hatch's plans Environmental group The Woodland Trust has called on the government to turn down Brands Hatch Circuit’s plan to develop the Kent track as a site for the 2002 British Grand Prix. After Sevenoaks District Council gave its permission to Brands Hatch to build a new pits complex, media centre and grandstands – changes insisted upon by the FIA, the sport’s governing body – the final nod must come from Environment Secretary John Prescott, since the circuit is within a greenbelt. But the Woodland Trust says granting permission would go against the government’s policy statements on ancient woodland. Redevelopment would mean the felling of 15 hectares of ancient woodland, but circuit owners Brands Hatch Leisure intend to replace these with 40 hectares at various sites. That pacified the government’s own environmental watchdog, English Nature, but not the Woodland Trust. A Woodland Trust statement said: “During a debate on ancient woodland in the House of Commons on May 10, 2000, Chris Mullin, parliamentary under secretary of state for the environment, transport and the regions, said that if Sevenoaks Council approved the Brands Hatch extension, it would be referred to the secretary of state as a departure from the development plan and that he would have the opportunity to call in the plan should he see fit. The Woodland Trust demands that this now happens.” A decision is expected within the next three weeks. |
||
|
12 Jul 2000, 19:42 (Ref:22834) | #5 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 1998
Posts: 11,001
|
How do we support this lot ? We can't allow Bernie to get his hands on Brands! Save the trees...!
|
|
|
13 Jul 2000, 10:26 (Ref:22942) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 482
|
|||
|
13 Jul 2000, 11:12 (Ref:22950) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,211
|
Here Here!!!!!
Save Brands Hatch GP!!! Save Paddock Hill, save Dingle Dell, save Stirlings!!! Oh, and save the trees!!! Let Rockingham have the GP and then everyone will be happy - apart from the BRDC that is... I think the pressure may be on Mr Prescott... |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DTM at Brands Hatch | Mark Mitchell | Marshals Forum | 124 | 26 Dec 2005 12:34 |
F4 at Brands Hatch | kickstart | Club Level Single Seaters | 4 | 21 Jun 2004 07:49 |
Brands Hatch 22/23 May | adstubbs | Marshals Forum | 12 | 21 May 2004 09:34 |
Brands Hatch GPL | rdjones | Virtual Racers | 15 | 10 Mar 2003 08:21 |
Brands Hatch | pirenzo | Sportscar & GT Racing | 9 | 17 Dec 2002 22:40 |