|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Nov 2003, 14:19 (Ref:772757) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Zanardi praises Dallara
In the latest issue of italian magazine Autosprint there is an article by Alex Zanardi about Renna's death.
he gave it such a title "let's give great honours to Saint Dallara" He says it's no surprise that Dallara cars, despite many flying accidents, granted drivers survival, indirectly meaning that GForce didn't. He particularly claims that people who historically were interested at safety , like Mr. Dallara, should get more attentions in the high skies of motorsport government; he says (about racing on ovals): "competent people like Mr Dallara and his equipe could study the problem without distorting the rulebooks, like it happened in F1..." What do you think about it? |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
4 Nov 2003, 19:53 (Ref:773025) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
|
Brack and Andretti were both in Dallaras. That Renna was in an unsurviveable accident isnt the fault of GForce.
Maybe Zanardi should be praising Lola? Afterall no one's lost their legs in one of those. |
|
|
4 Nov 2003, 22:30 (Ref:773195) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
But then, there hasn't been an accident like that other than in a Reynard.
The indirect meaning climb gives to Zanardi's article is not necessarily the meaning Alex meant. I think he's more than anything prasing a man. |
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
5 Nov 2003, 07:45 (Ref:773487) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
I have the article under my eyes right now; I can read:
"I think that many drivers shold light more than a candle to Saint Dallara" from Parma, since during the IRL season we saw many spectacular accidents, where drivers just got a big fright...." It's arguable that Brack's crash didn't cause just a fright, but its result was anyways way different from Renna's. From what we know it's impossibile to say that it was or it was not GForce fault. The two cars are built differently, after all. Brack had a terrible crash, too; it originated ina totally different way, but both wnet against the fence. One chassis kinda protected the dirver's life, the other one didn't. Last edited by climb; 5 Nov 2003 at 07:47. |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
5 Nov 2003, 12:03 (Ref:773716) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
Quote:
I don't think you can compare these two accidents at all, certainly not to prove how well each make of car stood up. I saw Kenny's crash and the cockpit didn't take the force of the impact with the gatepost - the rear of the car did. Watching the crash live I assumed he must have been killed from the sheer force of that hit, but when I saw it again on replay I realised that the cockpit was clear of the main impact that caused the car to disintegrate. Kenny was extremely lucky, his cockpit broke from the rest of the car and spun down the track, dispersing the energy of the accident. I haven't seen Tony's crash obviously, but I imagine from the description of the aftermath that in his case the cockpit area took a major impact with the safety fence. Reports say it remained tangled in the fence. If his car did come to an almost instant halt on impact (I am making an assumption here), then that would explain why he succumbed to blunt force injuries while Kenny escaped with his lesser injuries. It is absolutely meaningless to imply that the G-Force failed to "protect the driver's life" by simply comparing Renna's crash with Brack's. The circumstances of both accidents were clearly different. And I agree with Jordi as to Zanardi's intended sentiments. I think you may be misinterpreting him, climb. |
|||
|
6 Nov 2003, 22:10 (Ref:775276) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
And since we do not have a clue as to how Renna's crash happened, we can't really compare it...
|
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
7 Nov 2003, 07:58 (Ref:775677) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 431
|
Maybe Alex speaks in an ironic tongue?
|
||
|
7 Nov 2003, 13:42 (Ref:775964) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Not at all, it's a serious article written by himself about safety: no room for irony indeed.
|
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
8 Nov 2003, 00:51 (Ref:776457) | #9 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,455
|
I watched Brack's shunt on a frame by frame slo-mo. The deciding factor was undoubtably the fact that he personally made no contact with the fence due. Nobody's seen poor Tony's accident, but the report that the tub remained stuck in the fence tells you all you need to know about the forces involved. Alex is a hero, in the true sense, but once a car leaves the ground, the end result is purely down to luck.
|
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
9 Nov 2003, 18:53 (Ref:778068) | #10 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20
|
If Rennas car did come to a sudden stop in the catch fencing it wouldnt matter what he was in be it a dallara or a tank the internal injuries are going to be just as severe
|
|
|
9 Nov 2003, 20:37 (Ref:778155) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,125
|
Thoughtful post, UMBOP, and welcome to the forum!
|
||
__________________
Don't make a fuss, just get on the bus! |
9 Nov 2003, 22:46 (Ref:778268) | #12 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,455
|
Yes, my point exactly. It matters not what you are in, somtimes physics is against you. RIP Tony.
|
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
10 Nov 2003, 13:04 (Ref:778772) | #13 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,344
|
what would happen if they gave the cars ground effects or a skirt: sucking them to the ground, would that be safer?
|
||
__________________
"Abe will be remembered as a fighter" - RIP Abe. |
10 Nov 2003, 14:55 (Ref:778886) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
No, because cars are already well sucked under normal circumstances. If, however, the car is unsettled, it will fly...
|
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
11 Nov 2003, 02:00 (Ref:779399) | #15 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,344
|
damn that sucks.
|
||
__________________
"Abe will be remembered as a fighter" - RIP Abe. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ross Brawn praises Kimi | ljakse | Formula One | 32 | 22 Dec 2003 11:50 |
Head Praises Montoya | Led ZeppF1 | Formula One | 25 | 25 Sep 2003 11:33 |
Michael praises helping hands. | z2252314 | Formula One | 13 | 4 Jul 2003 22:24 |
Montoya praises Raikkonen | neilap | Formula One | 4 | 10 Mar 2002 22:48 |
Williams Praises Ralf Schumacher | Schumacher | Formula One | 4 | 16 Apr 2001 19:28 |