Schumi blames Villeneuve for the booing - Page 2

freud · 11 Jun 2002, 17:38 (Ref:310797)

A R R O G A N C E

senna12 · 12 Jun 2002, 03:15 (Ref:311204)

It is rather presumptuous (bold, impertinent, fresh, imprudent, rude, or forward) of him to assume that Jacques will never compete with him again. Who does he think he is, bloody Nostradamus?

freud · 12 Jun 2002, 04:01 (Ref:311213)

LOL... Completely agree with you!

Mr V · 12 Jun 2002, 04:01 (Ref:311215)

Quote:

Originally posted by Bibendum

On a related front, I see MS implies that Ferrari have promised their fans that they will not do it again. This contradicts both Todt's and Brawn's rather emphatic public statements that they will indeed "do it" again if the occasion should arise.

as TGF is the one whose bore the brunt of the fans disapproval over the Austrian farce, given that he's the only one who opperates the loud pedal on the No 1 Ferrari, will he, should The Toad or/and Brawn instruct him to go past Rubens again as we saw in Austria, actually do it? or will he dis-obey a team order?

freud · 12 Jun 2002, 04:05 (Ref:311216)

Imho TGF will do it again...

Jukebox · 12 Jun 2002, 04:06 (Ref:311218)

I think Ferrari are going to let Poopens win a race after this cause clearly he was given the chance in Canada but it was just not his luck on that day.

Mr V · 12 Jun 2002, 04:09 (Ref:311220)

Canada would have been Rubens ideal oppertunity, but luck doesn't come into it Juke imo, on the day, he wasn't fast enough!

Jukebox · 12 Jun 2002, 04:16 (Ref:311223)

That's for sure mr v....Poopens had always have this inconsistent problem. That's why he's the second fiddle and i for one wouldn't count on him to be the first driver in any team for that matter.

Valve Bounce · 12 Jun 2002, 04:21 (Ref:311225)

The cars' electronics can be adjusted from the pits now. The TOAD won't have to instruct anybody to do anything - he holds the controls, and can cause the engine to run lean, fat, slower, or even CROAK. TOAD intimated s much aftr Austria when he said that he could have slowed Rubens by other means, but decided to let everyone know that it was really Rubens's race. Now wasn't that nice.

Don't forget, the electronics controls the gearbox, diff, valves, TRAX, and so on. No!! The order to move over will nevr be given again - I promise you.

Gee!! It's difficult to sit on crossed fingers.

Valve[img]http://www.**************************/smilies/bouncy.gif[/img]

freud · 12 Jun 2002, 04:27 (Ref:311227)

Quote:

Originally posted by Jukebox
Poopens had always have this inconsistent problem. That's why he's the second fiddle and i for one wouldn't count on him to be the first driver in any team for that matter.

he's never had the equal machine under his

bum.

Jukebox · 12 Jun 2002, 04:34 (Ref:311231)

Funny for a guy who dosen't get an equal machine managed to get a better setup and outqualify TGF occasionally

think about that freud

Gt_R · 12 Jun 2002, 05:33 (Ref:311258)

Freud... evidence that Rubens did not get equal machine?

If none, how about some logical reasonings to back up your false presumption?

Or is it just an insensible statement?

Red · 12 Jun 2002, 05:47 (Ref:311262)

Gt-R, are you serious?

Anyway, let's summarize.

Michael needs teamorders to win.

Waitaminute, he doesn't. He makes Ferrari hire only 3rd rate slaves because he's afraid of serious competition. (how does that still a mystery, I mean insignificant detail)

Waittwominutes, that's not true either! Since he sabotages an already second rate car it means that he has competition in the team.

Jukebox · 12 Jun 2002, 06:06 (Ref:311273)

And lets not forget that TGF always cheats and has no passion towards the sport and his mum would be ashamed of having him as a son and all that sort

Red · 12 Jun 2002, 06:12 (Ref:311274)

That's so true, how could I miss it...

And let's not forget Bill Clinton.

Anyway. Senna12, to call Jacques a "past competitor" is definitelly not nice. But at the moment you don't have to be Nostradamus to actually realize that he's not a current competitor" and since no Williams deal is feasible for the next year, and Jacques repeatedly rejects every offer that comes from Maranello he won't be a "future competitor" anywhere soon.

calais · 12 Jun 2002, 09:51 (Ref:311352)

Quote:

Originally posted by Jukebox
And lets not forget that TGF always cheats and has no passion towards the sport and his mum would be ashamed of having him as a son and all that sort

very true, jukebox

Jukebox · 12 Jun 2002, 10:18 (Ref:311387)

tsk..tsk..tsk...can't you see we are teasin you guys including you calais

calais · 12 Jun 2002, 10:28 (Ref:311400)

what????
i thought that was your most intelligent post!!!

Red · 12 Jun 2002, 10:34 (Ref:311406)

Well, it was an intelligent post calais. But you "missed" the point...

BBKing · 12 Jun 2002, 12:53 (Ref:311526)

When was the last time you saw a guy in a two stopper having a 10 seconds pit stop? Did you see Barrichello telling those mechanics cleaning his car to **** off? ....LOL

I don't think it would be smart for Schumacher and his lackeys Brawn and Toad to repeat Austria. Even if they say they would. Is better to make sure Barrichello is never in front of Schumacher.

Superior equipement? What about Brazil? or Japan 2001? Yea right Schumacher is the safer bet blah blah blah. But don't say Barrichello, a third class driver, gets the same car/treatment from Schurarri

Wrex · 12 Jun 2002, 12:59 (Ref:311535)

Quote:

Originally posted by Red
Well, it was an intelligent post calais. But you "missed" the point...

Why do I get the feeling I've heard that before, and will here it again?

Red · 12 Jun 2002, 13:06 (Ref:311541)

BB, I'll draw you a sketch:

1 car + 2 drivers = 1 of them is more equal than the other ==> if Rubens got that car the "public" would cry that either:
a) Schumacher is persecuted
or
b) Rubens got out of gas because they gave him an untested car (besides, why did not Schumacher drive one? Because he knew it's not reliable etc.)

BBKing · 12 Jun 2002, 13:11 (Ref:311548)

Yeah right. The F2001 was reliable for Barrichello .....LOL

Do you remember Schumacher taking the T-Car from Barrichello because "it was faster"? How can you guys be so blind?

Red · 12 Jun 2002, 13:15 (Ref:311554)

The F2001 WAS reliable. Rubens ran out of gas. Still you have to explain me why they should give the (only) new car to Rubens.

BBKing · 12 Jun 2002, 13:28 (Ref:311572)

Run out of gas? that is something new.

They only 1 F2002 because they said it was not tested. Why would they risk to put Schumacher in an untested car an give Barrichello the reliable F2001? I forgot. Ferrari wanted to give Barrichello the best equipement for his home race ....LOL

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Illien blames Montoya	Marbot	Formula One	36	30 Jan 2006 12:18
Cromley blames Ritter!	Camaroz	Australasian Touring Cars.	32	11 Oct 2005 05:56
HEAD blames FERRARI and FIA...	ralf fan	Formula One	60	20 Nov 2003 13:28
MS blames Sato	neilap	Formula One	31	14 Oct 2003 00:21
Irvine blames PDLR	Wrex	Formula One	31	26 Sep 2002 12:07