Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Jul 2008, 20:40 (Ref:2256159)   #1
jonners
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 312
jonners should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Is it worth lowering the engine?

Lotus Cortina - about as mechnically sophisticated as a wheelbarrow.

Used for hillclimbing.

Always looking for the ultimate but getting to the point where the nth degree of modification is not going to make a vast amount of difference.

The question is whether lowering the engine by, say 1 - 2 inches is worth bothering with.

Will necessitate some expensive mods but I was contemplating some of them anyway

I know its difficult to answer a question like this in a vaccuum without more info but what I'm looking for is whether in principle it's a very worthwhile mod in any circumstances or if it's a bit over the top for a low level clubman
jonners is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jul 2008, 21:28 (Ref:2256192)   #2
GORDON STREETER
Veteran
 
GORDON STREETER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Spain
Kent+Mojacar Spain, but not always ?
Posts: 9,441
GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!GORDON STREETER is going for a new world record!
Anything that puts weight lower down is a plus point for handling.
However the mods needn't be that difficult or expensive depending on your expertise and ability.
Presumably you have a dry sump set up so you could mod the crossmember to take the sump rail and starter motor
The main problems start with the standard steering assembly and would probably need a rack and pinion in front. Also the gearbox will be lower and ground clearance may cause a problem on the bellhousing especially on excursions off the track!!
Seems a shame to do it to a LC
GORDON STREETER is offline  
__________________
Balls of steel (knob of butter) They're Asking For Larkins. ( Proper beer) not you're Eurofizz crap. Hace más calor en España. Me han conocido a hablar un montón cojones! Send any cheques and cash to PO box 1 Lagos Nigeria Africa !
Quote
Old 22 Jul 2008, 21:29 (Ref:2256193)   #3
Alex Laidlaw
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 21
Alex Laidlaw should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You want the engine as low and far back as possible, if it can be done without causing further issues then the advantage will be considerable.
Alex Laidlaw is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Jul 2008, 22:10 (Ref:2256218)   #4
Zico
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 253
Zico should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Every little helps. It wont knock many seconds of your times in itself but will certainly help give you a better foundation on which to base your chassis dynamics.

If you choose to do it I would also use the oportunity to try and move the engine back for improved PMI.

At the moment we are in the process of building a Grp4 mkII Escort rallycar for the forrests, we decided that it made sense to start with the very best possible chassis foundation we could, within the constraints and regs we had, while still at fabrication stage.

We fabricated an extremely large gearbox/propshaft tunnell to aid chassis stiffness and allow for excellent engine/gearbox positioning options and to accomodate any future suspension travel modifications we might want to do.
We replaced and moved the front bulkhead rearwards which allowed us to mount the engine 20cm further back which in turn allowed us to make the most of moving the drivers seat position rearwards by the same amount.
We had to build a new steering collum and fit a floor mounted peddlebox which can adjust for reach rather than compromising by moving the seat forwards.

We have also purchased a Fuel cell which will allow us to site it behind the drivers seat mid-ship due to having no need for a firewall.

We've yet to decide where the spare wheel will be sited (probably beaneath the navigators footrest) but hopefully the end result will be to have the very best weight distribution and PMI by moving as much weight as possible to the centre of the car.
This perhaps sounds very OTT for most but it makes sense when building from scratch..


Might be a bit of work involved but every little helps and its a free gain.. I guess its down to how serious you want to take your hillclimbing.

Last edited by Zico; 22 Jul 2008 at 22:17.
Zico is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jul 2008, 07:37 (Ref:2256374)   #5
greenamex2
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,686
greenamex2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
We did the Corolla's engine last winter. It wasn't difficult at all.

Just moved it back as far as the firewall allowed and down as far as the cross member would allow so not a great amount (and 1.5 inches or so back and 5/8 of an inch lower).

The car now doesn't understeer but we also changed some other stuff at the same time so I not sure how much difference just moving the engine would have made.
greenamex2 is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jul 2008, 12:57 (Ref:2256571)   #6
jonners
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 312
jonners should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Interesting stuff - thanks to all for your comments.

Hillclimbing allows flexibility in terms of the tech regs so more or less anything goes but we won't be relocating the bulkhead or anything like that.

We don't run a dry sump at the moment so that's where most of the expense lies but that has advantages in itself.

We would weld engine mount brackets to the chassis rails and modify the cross member. Might be able to move the engine back a fraction but not much so probably won't bother.

It's a Mk 2 Lotus \Cortina so there's more space than a Mk 1 - should be ok with the steering and we're already using a small starter so hopefully ok there too.

Exhaust manifold will need looking at and we're using a Sierra Type 9 gearbox casing which is bigger than standard so that's going to hang down a bit more than we'd like.

What I want to achieve is better handling - finding really beneficial improvements on a car such as this isn't hard because the standard set up is so crude and we've already worked on that but the more I learn the more I realise we're way off as good as we can get.

The point is - and this is the mission statement behind the whole project that has been running now for years and years - we want to make the car as good as possible by doing the right things not just by whacking on the stiffest springs and turning it into a nightmare. I should add that we don't have a trailer...

So 1 - 2 inches is enough to make a difference then? Our engine block is heavier than standard as it's both chunkier and taller so it's got to be a step in the right direction - just wondering if in reality 1 - 2 inches is not enough to make a big difference in the crude world of 60's Fords....
jonners is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Jul 2008, 13:34 (Ref:2258522)   #7
boyracer
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location:
western australia
Posts: 153
boyracer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There's maybe better things to be spending your money on, but most of racecar performance is not about the big things, it's about all the little things. Don't know if it's possible to offset the motor slightly in the chassis at the same time, allow for some compensation on driver weight. Shouldn't need to move it much for that.
boyracer is offline  
__________________
Happiness is seeing the race ....... in your rear view mirror
Quote
Old 29 Jul 2008, 20:56 (Ref:2259876)   #8
JohnD
Veteran
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
North West UK
Posts: 1,074
JohnD should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJohnD should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
jonners,
Lowering the engine in stage rally car? With a standard sump, rather than a dry one with greater clearance? You'll know better than I, but is that wise?

What do other Cortina drivers do? Is this a common mod? They've been around so long, I would have thought there was a consensus on the 'standard' mods and what was unwise.

John
JohnD is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Jul 2008, 19:16 (Ref:2260486)   #9
Zico
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 253
Zico should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
jonners,
Lowering the engine in stage rally car? With a standard sump, rather than a dry one with greater clearance? You'll know better than I, but is that wise?

What do other Cortina drivers do? Is this a common mod? They've been around so long, I would have thought there was a consensus on the 'standard' mods and what was unwise.

John
His Lotus Cortina is a hillclimb car.
Zico is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Sep 2008, 21:55 (Ref:2292120)   #10
morninggents
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
England
Up north, near York.
Posts: 2,852
morninggents should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
In my experience even half an inch lower made a difference.
morninggents is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
This is worth a look! turbolag Rallying & Rallycross 4 29 Nov 2006 13:43
Anything worth seeing at... Logrence Trackside 3 26 Jul 2004 09:12
How much are you worth vortexo Cool Sites 4 11 Sep 2003 23:14


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.