|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Jul 2009, 08:25 (Ref:2495994) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
New information on the new car
http://www.trackforum.com/forums/sho...53#post2080153
- 2011 (or maybe 2012 ) - More than one supplier? - 'Radically different from the last 30 years' - whatever that could mean |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
6 Jul 2009, 05:20 (Ref:2496372) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Hey John,
Thanks for posting that link...interesting read. |
||
|
12 Jul 2009, 22:11 (Ref:2500407) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,789
|
Front engined? Based on new Panoz LMP1??
|
||
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?' |
13 Jul 2009, 01:59 (Ref:2500472) | #4 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 117
|
Odd. I've been looking forward to a new car, but I had hoped it would be a step forward in technology, something that takes advantage of the aero revolutions of the last twenty years, with raised noses and barge boards and such. Something to makes the cars look modern. Instead I see a drawing of a car that was made absolute in 1959.
I have never threatened to stop watching any form of motorsport before, but front engines indycars just might do it. |
|
|
13 Jul 2009, 03:02 (Ref:2500491) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes |
14 Jul 2009, 16:59 (Ref:2501686) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 798
|
Quote:
The way I see it IRL now has a pretty unique chans to set at new standard within open wheel racing since they're the only top level series that run both types of circuits. Ovals + Road courses + Modern tech. Don't worry so much about traditions vs change. |
|||
|
14 Jul 2009, 19:22 (Ref:2501793) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Don't assume anything based on those images from that site...
There are a lot of "old School" fans over there that would like to see front-engined cars come back....Those are renderings from someone who still has that itch. Ain't gonna happen.... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
14 Jul 2009, 20:55 (Ref:2501857) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
The way I see it is that people who want to see an all-oval open-wheel series with front engined cars should just watch USAC, which looks rather entertaining, especially on dirt
|
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
16 Jul 2009, 13:09 (Ref:2502751) | #9 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,311
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund |
16 Jul 2009, 16:29 (Ref:2502854) | #10 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 71
|
I dont know why they dont just use the Panoz champcar it was a good car and only used for one season.
|
||
|
16 Jul 2009, 17:01 (Ref:2502879) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Quote:
When the DP01 was created, it was also revealed that it would have taken Panoz 3 years of additional cars, parts and other bits supplied to teams just to break even on the project...They lost their shirts in the deal and took a pennies on the dollar settlement from Champ Car as part of CCWS's bankruptcy. I loved the DP01, but the reality of our times is that it can't be revived...at least by Panoz at this time... |
|||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
16 Jul 2009, 17:13 (Ref:2502882) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,311
|
I think it could be done for 2012 (if Panoz was interested)
|
||
__________________
It's time to switch to Whiskey, we've been drinking Beer all night - Corb Lund |
16 Jul 2009, 17:33 (Ref:2502888) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
It is my understanding that Panoz/Elan Motorsports Technologies has reduced its workforce to the bare bones...the only person on-staff who could even remotely design these changes is underqualified to do so...that person is a mere draftsman...
Their aero people and engineers were all laid off...can't design or implement the proper changes that would be needed if you don't have the qualified personnel to do the job... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
16 Jul 2009, 23:58 (Ref:2503062) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 6,038
|
Tim's right and it's a shame, as the DP01, with the Ford XFE engine will go down as one of my favourite cars of all time. It looked great, provided great racing on circuits as tight as San Jose and was a bargain compared to the previous chassis Champ Car was running and even more so compared to the IRL's Dallaras. Sadly, I think we'll only be seeing these cars in Euroboss and other old-car series. Still, that doesn't mean the IRL couldn't make a similar looking car for their new chassis...or at least one that looks more like the old Lolas - those did ovals.
|
||
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes |
19 Jul 2009, 17:10 (Ref:2504265) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
Well that car turned out to be the Formula Superleague car and judging on the races I've seen from it this season it races well and looks damn good too! A little "what might have been..." for CC fans I guess. Onto the next IRL car and, well I'm worried. It has depressed me to hear of the recent problems with the IRL car on ovals and then having the IRL itself have a think about the issue and decide more downforce was the solution. Until the IRL gets out of its "less power than grip" mindset and keeps chucking downforce at the cars, we'll never get a decent racing machine out of these people. We haven't had one in the 15 year history of the IRL and we won't in 2012 unless they drop their whole philosiphy. If they went with something with a big grunty engine and gained the majority of its downforce from ground effect so it didn't disturb the airflow for the car behind too much then you'd get better racing and a spart of interest returning to the series. Only time will tell which path they choose to go down, but as I've said, I won't hold my breath. |
|||
__________________
We need to win like you need to breathe.... |
20 Jul 2009, 19:52 (Ref:2505049) | #16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
The problem is, there's always been a divide in American motorsports between those that want a more diversified series with a more road/street circuit focus and those that want a more oval track focus - with the later tending to want to make things 'the way it used to be'. That was used as justification for the original split (even if it was purely over one man's ego). Right now, the later bunch are controlling the show and likely want to map out the future of American open-wheel to look something like Indycar pre-CART. Unfortunately for them, any American open-wheel series will have to satisfy the fans of both forms of racing (e.g. IRL and Champ Car) if they want to survive in the long term. I'm not sure of those in charge of the IRL realise this... I have my doubts. |
|||
__________________
"I used to hate writing, but now I enjoy it. I realized that the purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog!" - Calvin and Hobbes |
20 Jul 2009, 21:25 (Ref:2505095) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
We need to win like you need to breathe.... |
20 Jul 2009, 23:50 (Ref:2505157) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,244
|
Too late to edit now (but I hope the automerged doublepost thing goes through!) but as an addendum to my last post I have to also say you cannot make the best decisions for all of North American Open Wheel racing while focusing on the legacy of but one racetrack.
#edit It seems this forum doesn't do that, many apologies! |
||
__________________
We need to win like you need to breathe.... |
21 Jul 2009, 03:43 (Ref:2505200) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
Overall it was a good car at the end of the day and it did the job, but it's already several years old so there is no future in reviving it. In regards to a new car I think it's clear it's a necessity, but the problem is the money has run out and with the turmoil at ims, there seems to be no clarity as to what will happen. Probably one reason tony got the boot was he couldn't get manufacturers on board anymore to bankroll his series. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Source of information | ljakse | Announcements and Feedback | 14 | 17 Nov 2003 12:30 |
Useful Information | EvilPumpkin | Marshals Forum | 10 | 3 Jun 2002 09:35 |
A.L.D. Information | Charles Warner | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 30 Jul 2001 19:09 |
Looking for information on the Japanese Domo Race car was it ever raced | carmaginfo | Motorsport History | 4 | 17 Apr 2001 20:27 |