|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
2 Jun 2011, 18:43 (Ref:2890113) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 141
|
Is lambda and knock sensors necessary on a race engine
I am running a E46 M3 S54 BMW race engine on standalone ecu with 12.5/1 compression ratio (Standard is 11.5/1) and was told if the car is mapped properly on race fuel it is not necessary to run Lambda control
The engine is also not running knock sensors what is the difference between wideband and standard lambda Any info would be much appreciated |
||
|
2 Jun 2011, 20:50 (Ref:2890186) | #2 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 253
|
Wideband Lambdas have a much higher resolution, see this link for a full explanation..
Planar Sensors Before discussing Wideband sensors it should be noted that whilst the Wideband sensor is sometimes termed 'Planar', Bosch make a narrowband sensor that also has a planar construction. Instead of the solid electrolyte of the Zirconia types, this is replaced by ceramic laminate layers, and these laminate layers are silk-screen printed to configure them. The big advantage with this method of construction is that the heater can be buried within the sensor layers, thus making the sensor heat up to operating temperature much more quickly. Wideband sensors The current generation of sensors are termed Wideband, Planar, UEGO or 'A/F ratio sensors' (Air/Fuel ratio sensors). They are much better at gauging exactly how much Oxygen is in the exhaust stream, rather than the simple switching action of the narrowband sensors. The term 'planar' comes from the shape of the sensing element which is a flat strip (plane), rather than the thimble shape of traditional sensors. Figure 11 - Cutaway view of a planar wideband sensor Wideband sensors have only become necessary as engine management systems have evolved to the point where a more accurate sensor is required to meet low-emission vehicle targets - the old style of sensors had their characteristic 'switching point' for various historical reasons. The wideband sensor is an absolute requirement for lean-burn and fuel ionising mixture control strategies (eg. Volkswagen FSi) as well as diesel vehicles. The wideband sensor allows the ECU to gauge how well combustion is occurring right down to very lean mixtures. Figure 12 - Wideband sensor output curve (red) compared with narrowband sensor output range (green) The sensor works on broadly the same principle as an ordinary sensor (Nernst cell) but with an added internal system (a device called an oxygen pump), and the output current varies in proportion to the Oxygen present in the exhaust. As can be seen from the graph, it can measure a far wider range than a traditional sensor, but more importantly when it is within the range that we are most interested in (from Lambda=0.9 to Lambda=1.1) the response graph is fairly linear, meaning that we can determine the exact oxygen content of the exhaust gas, rather than a steep switching point around the central area. Under cruising conditions in a modern engine, the AF ratio can extend to about 20:1 and the wideband lets us measure accurately at these lean mixtures. Another, more complex method of decoding the signal is needed by the ECU using a custom ASIC, and the sensors are incompatible with earlier types. This type of sensor is only operational at temperatures of 600 degrees C or more, requiring a powerful heater. Wideband sensors can be identified by their multi-wire harness (five, six or more wires), and are generally fitted to:
Wideband sensors for Motorsport applications Wideband sensors are used by racing teams to accurately gauge high performance tuned engines. Lambda meters can be purchased that use a wideband sensor to allow data logging of mixture strength and other engine paramenters. It should be noted that WB lambdas designed for passenger cars are not the same as the ones designed for motorsport use, and are thus not compatible. As well as being engineered to be more resilient, motorsport WB sensors are calibrated to have a wide output response, whereas the passenger vehicles are calibrated to have most accuracy around stoichiometry and very lean mixtures. A racing car will spend much of its time at the opposite end of mixture strength, over-fuelling for maximum performance. http://www.lambdapower.co.uk/TechNotes/Tech-8.asp Im no expert and I dont know how consistant in RON, race fuel is but it sounds a bit risky to me. |
|
|
5 Jun 2011, 23:48 (Ref:2891825) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 141
|
So what do the experts on here think
|
||
|
8 Jun 2011, 09:26 (Ref:2893321) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,010
|
Lambda, yes because you want to be able to optimize your air fuel ratios.
Knock, no, because you'll be hard pressed to find a standalone ecu which will be able to make sense of a knock sensor input. |
||
__________________
Keep living the dream! |
8 Jun 2011, 14:13 (Ref:2893477) | #5 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 44
|
If you are running something like Omex then you can run a knock sensor.
I would run a knock if you can because then you can advance the ignition map safe in the knowledge that if it goes a little too far at times the knock sensor will protect it. |
|
|
10 Jun 2011, 15:09 (Ref:2895176) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 9,718
|
Given the damage I've seen when pushing the limits of tuning I'd run both if I could, melted pistons etc are expensive.
|
|
|
15 Jun 2011, 08:34 (Ref:2899276) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 509
|
Since you said lambda control then I'd say now, it is not necessary. It's nice but you also have to remember that not all ecu's do decent lambda control. If the engine was mapped and set up properly it should be fine. Logging lambda is an excellent tool for diagnostics and is worth keeping an eye on for problems popping up.
Knock control is not necessary at all if the engine has been mapped properly. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Formula ford pics from knock hill this year | POAH | Club Level Single Seaters | 2 | 21 Sep 2005 21:53 |
Don't Knock Skaife | pete55 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 22 | 5 Mar 2003 13:58 |