Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 Jun 2011, 18:43 (Ref:2890113)   #1
Porscheman
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Ireland
Dublin Ireland
Posts: 141
Porscheman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Is lambda and knock sensors necessary on a race engine

I am running a E46 M3 S54 BMW race engine on standalone ecu with 12.5/1 compression ratio (Standard is 11.5/1) and was told if the car is mapped properly on race fuel it is not necessary to run Lambda control

The engine is also not running knock sensors

what is the difference between wideband and standard lambda

Any info would be much appreciated
Porscheman is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Jun 2011, 20:50 (Ref:2890186)   #2
Zico
Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 253
Zico should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Wideband Lambdas have a much higher resolution, see this link for a full explanation..
Planar Sensors

Before discussing Wideband sensors it should be noted that whilst the Wideband sensor is sometimes termed 'Planar', Bosch make a narrowband sensor that also has a planar construction. Instead of the solid electrolyte of the Zirconia types, this is replaced by ceramic laminate layers, and these laminate layers are silk-screen printed to configure them. The big advantage with this method of construction is that the heater can be buried within the sensor layers, thus making the sensor heat up to operating temperature much more quickly.
Wideband sensors

The current generation of sensors are termed Wideband, Planar, UEGO or 'A/F ratio sensors' (Air/Fuel ratio sensors). They are much better at gauging exactly how much Oxygen is in the exhaust stream, rather than the simple switching action of the narrowband sensors. The term 'planar' comes from the shape of the sensing element which is a flat strip (plane), rather than the thimble shape of traditional sensors.
Figure 11 - Cutaway view of a planar wideband sensor

Wideband sensors have only become necessary as engine management systems have evolved to the point where a more accurate sensor is required to meet low-emission vehicle targets - the old style of sensors had their characteristic 'switching point' for various historical reasons. The wideband sensor is an absolute requirement for lean-burn and fuel ionising mixture control strategies (eg. Volkswagen FSi) as well as diesel vehicles. The wideband sensor allows the ECU to gauge how well combustion is occurring right down to very lean mixtures.
Figure 12 - Wideband sensor output curve (red)
compared with narrowband sensor output range (green)

The sensor works on broadly the same principle as an ordinary sensor (Nernst cell) but with an added internal system (a device called an oxygen pump), and the output current varies in proportion to the Oxygen present in the exhaust. As can be seen from the graph, it can measure a far wider range than a traditional sensor, but more importantly when it is within the range that we are most interested in (from Lambda=0.9 to Lambda=1.1) the response graph is fairly linear, meaning that we can determine the exact oxygen content of the exhaust gas, rather than a steep switching point around the central area. Under cruising conditions in a modern engine, the AF ratio can extend to about 20:1 and the wideband lets us measure accurately at these lean mixtures.
Another, more complex method of decoding the signal is needed by the ECU using a custom ASIC, and the sensors are incompatible with earlier types. This type of sensor is only operational at temperatures of 600 degrees C or more, requiring a powerful heater.
Wideband sensors can be identified by their multi-wire harness (five, six or more wires), and are generally fitted to:
  • Any recent car utilising lean-burn or direct-injection engine technology
  • Diesel engined vehicles equipped with lamda sensors
  • Some Honda vehicles from about 1990 onwards used this type of sensor (L1H1)
  • Volkswagen FSi systems, and other stratified charge systems
  • Some non-automotive applications such as rolling roads and specialised laboratory gas-testing equipment
We now stock Bosch and NGK sensors for a number of wideband applications. The wideband sensor is especially suited to lean-burn, supercharged, turbocharged and high performance vehicles (eg. Subaru impreza 2002 onwards), as ignition detonation or 'knock', the enemy of the high-performance engine, can be avoided under all engine operating conditions by keeping a much closer check on the air/fuel ratio than would ever be possible with a narrowband sensor. This also applies to lean-burn engines, where the average (mean) mixture strength is very weak.
Wideband sensors for Motorsport applications

Wideband sensors are used by racing teams to accurately gauge high performance tuned engines. Lambda meters can be purchased that use a wideband sensor to allow data logging of mixture strength and other engine paramenters. It should be noted that WB lambdas designed for passenger cars are not the same as the ones designed for motorsport use, and are thus not compatible.
As well as being engineered to be more resilient, motorsport WB sensors are calibrated to have a wide output response, whereas the passenger vehicles are calibrated to have most accuracy around stoichiometry and very lean mixtures. A racing car will spend much of its time at the opposite end of mixture strength, over-fuelling for maximum performance.




http://www.lambdapower.co.uk/TechNotes/Tech-8.asp

Im no expert and I dont know how consistant in RON, race fuel is but it sounds a bit risky to me.
Zico is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Jun 2011, 23:48 (Ref:2891825)   #3
Porscheman
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Ireland
Dublin Ireland
Posts: 141
Porscheman should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So what do the experts on here think
Porscheman is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2011, 09:26 (Ref:2893321)   #4
Alex Hodgkinson
Veteran
 
Alex Hodgkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
England
Derby
Posts: 1,010
Alex Hodgkinson should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Lambda, yes because you want to be able to optimize your air fuel ratios.

Knock, no, because you'll be hard pressed to find a standalone ecu which will be able to make sense of a knock sensor input.
Alex Hodgkinson is offline  
__________________
Keep living the dream!
Quote
Old 8 Jun 2011, 14:13 (Ref:2893477)   #5
elitemotorsport
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 44
elitemotorsport should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
If you are running something like Omex then you can run a knock sensor.

I would run a knock if you can because then you can advance the ignition map safe in the knowledge that if it goes a little too far at times the knock sensor will protect it.
elitemotorsport is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jun 2011, 15:09 (Ref:2895176)   #6
zefarelly
Veteran
 
zefarelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
European Union
Posts: 9,718
zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!zefarelly has a real shot at the podium!
Given the damage I've seen when pushing the limits of tuning I'd run both if I could, melted pistons etc are expensive.
zefarelly is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jun 2011, 08:34 (Ref:2899276)   #7
EfiOz
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 509
EfiOz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Since you said lambda control then I'd say now, it is not necessary. It's nice but you also have to remember that not all ecu's do decent lambda control. If the engine was mapped and set up properly it should be fine. Logging lambda is an excellent tool for diagnostics and is worth keeping an eye on for problems popping up.

Knock control is not necessary at all if the engine has been mapped properly.
EfiOz is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Formula ford pics from knock hill this year POAH Club Level Single Seaters 2 21 Sep 2005 21:53
Don't Knock Skaife pete55 Australasian Touring Cars. 22 5 Mar 2003 13:58


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:24.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.