|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Apr 2000, 04:27 (Ref:10940) | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all. This is an article i am in the process of writing up for my web page ( http://www.qrda.asn.au ). Have a read through it, its not finished yet, but if you could give me any feedback, it would be greatly appreciated.
The naive will tell you that V8 Supercars will last forever. These were most probably the same people who would have told you that Group C, Group A and Super Tourers were to last forever. It is the nature of touring cars, situations change. Group C finished when the power that be decided Australia needed to step in line with the world and Group A was introduced. The men in charge had to make another change when crowds dwindled, and one car, the Nissan GT-R ruled supreme at the end of Group As reign ended. Next up was V8 Supercars. Super Touring cam along as the new Group A; a world wide formula, which proved to be very successful in it’s homeland of England. However ever rising costs and low attendances have brought it to an end I am not coming to you as the grim reaper, telling everyone V8s are dead. Motorsport at the top level in Australia has never been better, and it continues to grow. Attendances are huge, as are competitor numbers, at this stage of the ball game there are possibly 10 to 15 or more years left in the series. Possible reasons for the downfall of V8 Supercars include: The amount of money to be successful may become excessive, and force a decline in competitor numbers. Factory support ceases. Domination from one team discourages other competitors, crowds and sponsors. Another category comes along and proves to be more successful, and draws people and resources from V8s. Where V8s are failing under these rules: At present HRT are spending more than $300,000 on each individual new car the factory makes. They are the only team which can afford to spend that much money, and this can also be a part of the reason why their cars are so far ahead of the competition. The reason why Super Touring has failed here and in England was in part due to factory support. Without continuing money and support, it would prove hard to survive, and teams like HRT and FTR would have to find sponsorship, where there was previously no sponsorship to be found. Much like the days after Cigarette advertising finished, but when that happened, factory support came along and topped up the banks of several sponsorless teams. One shinning example to this is Transam in the USA, it continues to grow despite the recent pull out of GM and Ford. At the moment HRT fairly well has a monopoly on the top step of the podium. Whether this is discouraging fans etc is debatable, it may in fact be a good thing. However, just remember back to the final days of Group A, the Nissan team went from something that was cheered to victory in 1991, to be being booed on the podium in 1992. GTP has drawn some competitors away from V8 Supercars for various reasons, the main one being costs. For a smaller amount of money, competitors can get more TV time. Drivers to switch include Wayne Russell, Kevin Heffernan and Darcy Russell. Although it is not a threat at present, it could develop into one if disillusioned continue down this path. However, V8s have got a lot going for them, which includes: More active competitors than any other closed circuit class. More money in sponsorship than any other sport in Australia. Largest crowd figures in modern Australia motorsport. A sound and atmosphere which the crowd loves. My Draft Proposal This is simply an idea for some time in the future if ever there is need for a replacement category for V8 Supercars. What is needed is something which is: Affordable. Something the public can relate to. Something that the public would get just as much, or more enjoyment out of. Even parity. Controlled, yet very adjustable, so smart competitors can still gain an advantage, not necessarily the rich ones. I draw parts of the regulations from several different existing categories which include: Existing V8 Supercars Sport Sedans Nascar Transam Chassis/Bodywork A spec tubular space frame chassis, with fibreglass body work. Addition bars may be added to the roll cage structure, however bars from the spec cage may not be removed without approval. The outer body work is to resemble the road going variety of the race car. Put basically, a Ford, Holden or any other manufacturers skin would go over a standard chassis. Exotic materials such as carbon fibre and kevlar are to be used at a minimum, with standard carbon fibre fittings such as the dash board, and front passenger door insides for safety reasons. All of the chassis are to be made by an appointed firm, to ensure consistency throughout all of the cars, and that there are no discrepancies with the standard chassis. The chassis are to be set at a pre-arranged price from the builder to all competitors. The standard chassis is top be upgraded every so often by the ruling body to keep the cars evolving from one year to the next. The changes aren’t to differ greatly with the previous spec chassis. Pneumatic air jacks are permitted. Aerodynamic Aids Standard front and rear spoiler, with the rear having adjustable height, as well as tilt. Suspension McPherson Struts, live axel with Watts linkage. Pick up points are fixed. Springs etc are free. Brakes Brakes may only have 6 pistons, 1 calliper and 2 pads per wheel. Exotic brake pads are banned, only ferrous materials may be used. Electrical A standard electronic dash and telemetry system is to be used by all competitors. Fuel and Fuel Tank A standard unleaded fuel is to be used by all competitors, and the fuel is to be provided by the organisers. The fuel tank is to be of standard construction with standard pick up points. Tyres The tyres are to be made by an appointed company who will provide 2 different compound tyres for every event. The dimensions of the tyres are to be of the following dimensions: 18X10 inch front 18X12 inch rear Engine The engine is to have a maximum displacement of 5000cc, have a standard engine block, pistons and camshaft, and be fuel injected. The engine is to have a speed limit of 7000rpm. Exhaust and Cooling System Free. Transmission Gearbox The gearbox is to be of Hollinger H type arrangement, with a maximum 6 forward gears and one reverse. Each forward gear is to have the option of 2 different ratios. The clutch is free. Rear Axel A selection of 3 differentials with ratios of 3.2:1, 3.5:1, and 3.8:1 can be used at any circuit. Weight A set weight which includes driver. Ballast to be positioned in one of 4 preset positions: front, left side, right side, boot. Testing Testing is only to be carried out on approved days, either before each race meeting or on designated days set out by the series organisers. Reasoning Chassis/Bodywork The standard space frame chassis is to ensure parity amongst difference “makes” of car. To have it built by an outside company is to lower costs (to make sure no competitors spend excessive amounts of money on construction) It ensures that all of the cars are the same (taking the manufacturing out of the hands of the individuals, so that the rules can’t be read differently by different teams). Having the outside company build all of the cars in a field is not uncommon, just look at spec open wheel classes such as Formula 3000. The standard chassis is to be upgraded after every season, mainly to keep with upgraded safety standards, as well as making the cars different for the next season. Thus if a team has an advantage with a certain set up at a certain track, if the chassis is changed slightly it gives the opportunity for another team to perform. Aerodynamic Aids Having standard aerodynamics |
|
22 Apr 2000, 04:27 (Ref:10941) | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
18 May 2000, 00:36 (Ref:10942) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
Crash, my sincere apologies old chum, I didn't spot this first time round!
Your proposals sound remarkably like Andy Rouse's 'Supercars'. His plan was for recognisable bodyshells - 25 to choose from, with all external trim, and a bespoke chassis with Lotus Esprit V8 power. Unfortunately, the idea has been largely rejected by the British motoring press. The biggest innovation was the fact that there would be three drivers per car. Rouse hoped that this might attract an established star, a junior and a financier, each scoring points towards the drivers and team championships. Each of the twelve meetings per season would consist of three qualifying sessions and three sprint races. The permutations of new, inexperienced drivers and established 'stars' would mean exciting racing, and create a 'wild card' element. The stats read like this: Supercars - 400bhp, 300lbs/ft torque, 18x10 wheels, 14" discs/6 pots, 6 speed/RWD, 1100kg, 165mph. SuperTouring - 300bhp, 200lbs/ft, 18x8.5 wheels, 14" discs/6 pots, 6 speed/FWD, 975kg, 150mph. National Saloons - 220bhp, 170lbs/ft torque, 15x7 wheels, 11" discs/4 pots, 5 speed/F&RWD, 1020kg, 135mph. As you can see, the Supercars would have been a pretty good spectacle. Who are the promotors? BMP - the same people who have just taken over the BTTC. Is this a good thing? We'll have to see! |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new GT3 class | gttouring | Sportscar & GT Racing | 11 | 8 Oct 2005 15:55 |
Difference between F3 Scholarship class and A class F3 | hys911 | National & International Single Seaters | 3 | 8 Feb 2004 14:09 |
Class 'A' and Class 'B' in CART... | spider | ChampCar World Series | 12 | 19 Nov 2003 04:28 |
Crash Test's tipping comp? | tickfordchick | Australasian Touring Cars. | 6 | 22 Apr 2002 14:26 |
Rudd's crash at Pocono. Did anyone else get a little too nervous about his crash? | Joe Fan | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 1 | 28 Jul 2000 02:57 |