|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
27 Apr 2000, 19:08 (Ref:2451) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
Ford are in trouble with their rivals for using 'flat-bottomed' cars in the first two rounds of the championship.
While undertrays are banned, Prodrive have interpreted the rules a different way and used a flattened exhaust system, catalitic converter and oil catch tank. This was done to increase rear-end grip and eliminate ill-handling. Triple Eight, who prepare the Vectras, are said to be working flat out to prepare their cars to 'flat-bottom' spec for this weekends races at Thruxton. Other teams are unhappy, but the BTCC tech chief Peter Riches has declared the Prodrive cars fully legal. He said that it's within the letter of the rules, if not the spirit. Meanwhile, Ford have been doing rather well in the series so far, and even with the 'Success ballast', were almost 2mph faster than both Vauxhall and Honda. Could this aero advantage be their ace card? Is it true that TOCA are reluctant to penalise Ford/Prodrive, simply because to do so would affect one third of the works cars on the grid? If half the teams in F1 were found to be using traction control last year, would that be reason to ignore it. What do you say? Could this be almost as big as Alfa's 'Silverstone' aero-kitted 155's dominated way back when? |
||
|
27 Apr 2000, 20:37 (Ref:2452) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 928
|
Dunno but if the Swiss oaf wins another race I'm off to watch something else.
|
||
|
27 Apr 2000, 23:06 (Ref:2453) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 788
|
Ford say that their system is legal, so does TOCA's technical bod. What was outlawed was a flat undertray with a venturi at the back.
Ford introduced this because it was the only way to get any grip at the back end on the Mondeo, remember how bad they were last year... Vauxhall will catch up real quick, and as for Honda, they have a serious oversteer problem, so the last thing they want is more grip at the rear. Apart from which they have parted company with Fosstech, the people who build the cars. |
||
|
27 Apr 2000, 23:40 (Ref:2455) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
|||
|
28 Apr 2000, 03:28 (Ref:2454) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,919
|
Hmmm, Ford's interpretation of the rules sounds like Alfa's interpretation (aero aid) back in '93 and BMW's interpretation (of wheel well widening) back in '97? hmm, kinda makes me a little less impressed with Ford. =(
OTOH, everybody cheats--the successful ones just remain a secret! =) |
||
|
28 Apr 2000, 21:02 (Ref:2456) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 928
|
Blimey Sparky, you were concussed for longer than they thought
Vauxhall are busily flattening everything that will flatten before Thruxton including Yvan's hat. |
||
|
28 Apr 2000, 23:33 (Ref:2457) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 161
|
That's a coincedence actually, as in a recent interview Rickard was asked by a Swedish journalist what the reason was for the Ford's success this year. Rickard laughed and replied, "We cheated of course!" But he was only joking, he said the real reason was that they'd improved the engine in the winter.
I agree with Invader, if Menu wins another I'll have to get the old gun out and shoot his tyre... Hehehe... |
||
|
29 Apr 2000, 14:49 (Ref:2458) | #8 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,697
|
Wonder what they've done about the DGH?
|
||
|
29 Apr 2000, 15:33 (Ref:2459) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 788
|
I expect they stiffened it up using the roll cage
|
||
|
29 Apr 2000, 17:12 (Ref:2460) | #10 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,697
|
Hmmm,
Possibly... |
||
|
29 Apr 2000, 19:10 (Ref:2461) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
|||
|
30 Apr 2000, 17:25 (Ref:2462) | #12 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,697
|
Easy,
A clothes peg. |
||
|
1 May 2000, 00:31 (Ref:2463) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
Would that be a seamless T45 steel cross-braced clothes peg?
|
||
|
1 May 2000, 15:20 (Ref:2464) | #14 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,697
|
Yeah, but they still need to TIG the connections.
|
||
|
4 May 2000, 23:50 (Ref:2465) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
Ford and Vauxhall have been ordered to return their cars to pre-flat bottom spec.
Prodrive technical boss Dave Lapworth said the team agreed to the changes as "a gesture on our part to try and create a feeling of goodwill". Interestingly, Alain Menu drove the revised Mondeo at Millbrook and reported no change in the car's handling! |
||
|
4 May 2000, 23:54 (Ref:2469) | #16 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,697
|
Definitely a case of CB because if there's no difference then why do it in the first place?
The performance at Thruxton may well have been due to the penalty weights imposed. Thruxton is basically flat out all the way so the heavy braking into the chicane and the need to accelerate out of it would be more dramatically affected there than say at Donington or indeed Brands Hatch. I await the next round to see if the anno FB Mondeo is really as good as the PFB version. |
||
|
5 May 2000, 02:26 (Ref:2466) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 1999
Posts: 3,919
|
What is DGH or TIGs? Can someone shed some light?
|
||
|
5 May 2000, 08:16 (Ref:2467) | #18 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,697
|
LOL.
For the benefit of our non-technical colleagues. DGH or "Dirty Great Hole" refers to the hatchback on the Mondeo and was coined by my good mate Sparky during a long discussion concerning the merits of the saloon (4 door)rather than hatchback (5 Door) Mondeo. TIG is the acronym for Tungsten Inert Gas welding and has absulutely no direct connection with the topic. Hope this helps Did they return the cars to "pre flat bottom" or what we can now call BFB (before flat bottom) spec prior to Thuxton? |
||
|
5 May 2000, 08:24 (Ref:2468) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,512
|
So it seems Big M.
The Mondeo has grown a regular front-mounted catch tank (FMCT) again (why they didn't leave it out back I'll never know - the problem is it's shape, not it's location!) What do you make of Menu's assertion on the handling front? Company blurb, or inept Test Driver Syndrome? (TDS!) |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
98 mondeo engine | Kev_205 | Touring Car Racing | 6 | 11 Jan 2005 08:01 |
SuperTouring Mondeo for sale - 6K? | supertouring | Touring Car Racing | 25 | 10 Jan 2004 15:48 |
Please don't moan at our Mondeo... | Tedebear | Road Car Forum | 29 | 22 Aug 2003 13:06 |
Belgian Procar Mondeo | touringlegend | Touring Car Racing | 11 | 18 May 2002 21:01 |