|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
4 Apr 2005, 16:52 (Ref:1270045) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,043
|
Sand traps
As I watched experienced drivers like MW, Kimi, MS and Pedro (a couple of times) leave the track, I couldn't help but wonder how these guys would have fared on other less forgiving circuits. Bahrain has generous amounts of pavement and one could speculate that it is for that reason that the drivers take advantage of that, and drive closer to the edge, knowing they will not be beached. It can be quite exciting. This leads to the questions. Should there be more designs like Bahrain? Are sand traps too abundant and over used in F1?
|
|
|
4 Apr 2005, 16:54 (Ref:1270047) | #2 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,959
|
Well I think we should have some variety, so some circuits like that are great. There should also be a Monaco and Spa though. Mix-'em up.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
4 Apr 2005, 16:56 (Ref:1270049) | #3 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Agree with Adam - a variety of tracks is good.
And I agree that Bahrain does encourage people to push the envelope. |
|
|
4 Apr 2005, 17:01 (Ref:1270052) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,168
|
On TV, of course, it's great, but not so for the spectators at the circuit. Did you notice the long-distance views of the circuit - all the grandstands are on the S/F straight, and just around the first and last corners. There is nowhere to go to look at the rest of the circuit and, even if there was, you wouldn't be able to see much of the race cos you'd be bleeming miles away beyond a massive run-off area and a debris fence.
Imagine if they did that at Silverstone! Feeling "close to the action" is hard enough already. |
||
|
4 Apr 2005, 17:15 (Ref:1270068) | #5 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Variety is good but the wider tarmac run offs are safer and result in less retirements IMO.
The issue with gravel traps is they are designed assuming that the car will need to reduce speed very quickly. The flip side of this (literally) is that if the angle of entry is side on, gravel traps simply flip the cars over and when they are airborne they have no braking! As we saw in Bahrain, Webber was going at quite high speed when he went off, but because it was tarmac the car was still braking and able to stop without hitting anything - and of coures continue. Adam is right we need circuits like Monaco where there is no margin for error (which is part of the drivers art), but maybe more hard standing run off's rather - maybe gravel (or a similar speed retarder) should be used at the end of straights, and use tarmac around other corners? Another point is does the track 'safety' impact on how drivers attack the track, or does it become less of a factor when the lights go green? |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
4 Apr 2005, 18:35 (Ref:1270129) | #6 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,959
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
4 Apr 2005, 21:05 (Ref:1270233) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 518
|
Sakhir's run off areas surely encourage overtaking attempts, even clumsy (DLR) ones. I hate seeing drivers with carspeed advantage stuck behind slower guys because they know that anything but a perfect passing opportunity will result in a beached car. In Pedro's case, for example, he could have a shot knowing he had nothing to lose, he could fly off, catch up and have another go.
As others have said though, you must have variety. Gotta have the unforgiving armcomonster tracks to really sort 'em out! BTW, regarding Webber's off : wtf happened there? |
||
|
4 Apr 2005, 22:09 (Ref:1270288) | #8 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,454
|
Quote:
If there's no real penalty for a mistake (at Spa it wasn't even slower to get it wrong at Eau Rouge) then the drivers are more likely to risk it. |
|||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
4 Apr 2005, 22:36 (Ref:1270310) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,376
|
It takes an awful lot of space to get runoffs like Bahrain has, and like Mathias said, the crowds would be a mile from the action... Then again, there were no crowds at Bahrain.
But thats another issue... |
||
__________________
"I don't feel insecure about 'being girlie'. I do as much media as I can because I want this IRL series to be so kick-butt that NASCAR goes, 'Huh?'" Danica Patrick |
5 Apr 2005, 00:49 (Ref:1270374) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Apr 2005, 06:06 (Ref:1270477) | #11 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
Not so much that. Bahrain's population is only 800,000. And the race was held on a weekday. It would be equivalent to having the British Grand Prix on Tuesday afternoon. |
||
|
5 Apr 2005, 06:51 (Ref:1270545) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Is sunday a weekday out in Bahrain then? :confused:
|
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
5 Apr 2005, 07:16 (Ref:1270556) | #13 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Yes, it is.
The weekend is Thursday and Friday. |
|
|
5 Apr 2005, 08:44 (Ref:1270613) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
But is it a good thing?
Quote:
I never realised before that if a car was airborne it wasn't slowing down! I was sure air-resistance would actually lead to a slight slowing effect? Personally I would be all in favour of a wide tarmac run-off area that a) slowed the cars BUT b) penalised the drivers who took to them. I wouldn't want to see the cars damaged by going off but there ought to be someway to cause a penalty for the driver who takes to the run-off area. As far as more tracks like Baharain is concerned they could only spring up where it was a new development. It would cost almost as much to change say Brands Hatch to the Baharain model as it would to build a new circuit from scratch. There are too many nondiscript tracks currently on the Grand Prix schedule. If the cars are getting too fast for the tracks it is the cars that should change not the tracks! |
|||
|
5 Apr 2005, 09:29 (Ref:1270655) | #15 | ||
TT Photo Of The Year Winner - 2009 & 2010
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 533
|
Replacing sand/gravel with tarmac is fine as long as the driver still has the ability to control the car in terms of brakes & steering. However if you go into a corner and suffer brake failure (for example) you will hit the wall harder since the gravel does have some retarding effect. The answer to this in Bahrain is to make the runoffs the size of airfields since they have plenty of space to play with - most other tracks don't have this luxury and has been mentioned already the spectators are far enough away from the track as it is.
So IMHO 99% of the time the tarmac works better than gravel since spin and recoveries are now spin and continues. And yes it does mean that drivers are "braver" going into corners with tarmac runoffs since they are less worried about making a mistake that results in their dropping out of the race. |
||
__________________
Don't shop hungry; Don't drive angry. |
5 Apr 2005, 09:42 (Ref:1270672) | #16 | |||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Quote:
The point I was making about gravel traps is the increased danger of a car digging in and flipping over at which point the driver is a passenger waiting for the momentum to stop and with no possiblity of slowing or steering the car, as opposed to tarmac where the drive is able to continue to brake, steer and gain control. I appreciate that few circuits in the world can afford the luxury of run off's like Bahrain, however one of the talking points of the race - the duel between Webber and de la Rosa - was only possible because both drivers were able to push to the limit and beyond and continue. If there had been gravel both would have finished their race in it. |
|||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
5 Apr 2005, 10:26 (Ref:1270702) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,508
|
It must also be remembered that most tracks are used by both cars and bikes. While tarmac runoffs may be a good idea for cars they would greatly increase the danger factor for bikes. Sand/gravel traps are designed to retard the speed of the car/bike as quickly and safetly as possible. When are car has an off it is (usually) still on 4 wheels and can be controlled whereas a bike is riderless and without the sandtrap to slow the bike you would have 150kg+ high speed missile potentially aimed at the rider, crowd, flag marshalls etc.
For mine, leave the sandtraps. It is the driver/rider's job to stay on the track. If they leave the track then the focus should be on the safety of everyone concerned, not giving the driver a second chance. |
||
__________________
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. {Oscar Wilde} |
5 Apr 2005, 10:30 (Ref:1270706) | #18 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Good point about the tracks needing to be bike compatable as well.
|
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
5 Apr 2005, 12:47 (Ref:1270815) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Apr 2005, 12:53 (Ref:1270822) | #20 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
The penalty is they lose time and or track position, but can carry on and try to regain them.
|
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
5 Apr 2005, 13:52 (Ref:1270865) | #21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,043
|
Yes, it cost Webber a podium finish in Bahrain but that beats a dnf. To see a driver hung up in gravel and unable to continue, is most disappointing for me.
I DO like the fact that drivers can push harder; but as has been pointed out, for many "traditional" circuits, it is not feasible to have those huge paved run-offs. Still, for the future, I'd like to see more tracks like Bahrain. Last edited by Kirk; 5 Apr 2005 at 13:54. |
|
|
5 Apr 2005, 14:45 (Ref:1270920) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,493
|
Inconsistant?
Quote:
Kimmi's blooper only lost him time, if he had done something similar at Spa he would have been out of the race! |
|||
|
5 Apr 2005, 20:00 (Ref:1271215) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 518
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Apr 2005, 20:05 (Ref:1271219) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,575
|
Talking about mixing up tracks what about having a different race every year for the European GP? I thought that was the original and great idea and makes things more interesting. I want to see F1 back at Donington! Its a much better for spectators regarding your view of the track.
|
||
__________________
#teamyorkshire |
6 Apr 2005, 20:41 (Ref:1272041) | #25 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 198
|
Can F1's have a race there without destroying the track?...as in larger runoffs being built and all that rubbish
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sand in Engines this weekend | sawbench | Formula One | 5 | 1 Apr 2004 23:50 |
IRL IndyCars = Death Traps? | DNQ | IRL Indycar Series | 46 | 3 Jun 2003 04:30 |
Wills And Cat Car In The Sand | Seton_5 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 17 | 19 Sep 2002 21:33 |
Sand traps at Sears Point. | 24thunder | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 69 | 5 Jul 2002 03:56 |
Gravel Traps | NICKR | National & Club Racing | 28 | 9 Sep 2001 04:14 |