|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
30 Jun 2006, 16:38 (Ref:1645032) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 588
|
Removing lapped cars under SC (re-named)
Towards the end of the Montreal race, Kimi Raikonnen got stuck behing 2 lapped drivers under yellow flag circumstances, thus giving Alonso an 4 second lead.
Do you think that drivers should be allowed to overtake lapped drivers under yellow flag conditions? Does it make sense for the 2nd driver to be stuck behind 2 backmarkers because of the yellow flag. Read more here |
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 16:42 (Ref:1645037) | #2 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
It is frustrating, but only fair I feel.
Alonso has lapped the cars, Kimi hasn't. So why should Fernando lose out by having Kimi moved directly behind him. It's bad enough he has lost a thirty second lead! |
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 16:59 (Ref:1645054) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,359
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Doing an important job doesn't make you an important person. |
30 Jun 2006, 17:14 (Ref:1645070) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 238
|
Under local yellow, definately NO. The rule is there for the safety of workers. Under safety car conditions, again no, unless in controlled shuffling of the pack -- so go full course, clear up the incident, then spend a lap getting the backmarkers out of the way, then go green. That could work, but that's the only way it could work.
Even then -- do you want to? The sfety car freezes the race where it was -- why give the trailing driver free passes past backmarkers? It could have been the case that the leader lost time spending 2 laps going past -- why give the second place car an advantage? Luck of the draw -- leave it the way it is. |
||
__________________
President, MMS, Canada |
30 Jun 2006, 17:34 (Ref:1645092) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,968
|
I think the original poster is referring specifically to situations where the safety car has been deployed and not in normal yellow flag conditions, although this isn't very clear.
|
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 18:00 (Ref:1645115) | #6 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 Jun 2006, 18:04 (Ref:1645119) | #7 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,957
|
Quote:
I am against it. If you have two back markers between you then you should have overtaken them before the yellow like the leader had. You have already gained from the SC by getting all that time back. However I do think it was daft how the first lapped car behind Alonso didn't get a move on at the restart and thus held Raikkonen up. They need to be told to get on with it. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
30 Jun 2006, 18:06 (Ref:1645121) | #8 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,957
|
Thread title changed to reflect the topic more accurately
Here is another link for those Autosport subscribers: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/52814 |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
30 Jun 2006, 18:30 (Ref:1645141) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,445
|
It may be frustrating for a driver behind to have to overtake lapped cars before getting to fight with the leader after a safety car period, however, I feel that no rule changes should be implemented regarding this. If it were to be introduced for the first and second placed runners, then why not the third and fourth placed? This would probably result in a need to get all entrant on the lead lap together, then those a lap behind following them, then drivers two laps down thereafter and so on. With all the overtaking that would need to take place, I think it would probably negate the purpose of a safety car. Also it could be argued that by leaving lapped cars in order, then it offers some compensation to those who may have seen big leads disapeer.
|
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 19:43 (Ref:1645180) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,710
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 Jun 2006, 20:07 (Ref:1645194) | #11 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
|
Totally unfair to give them a lap back just for the sake of giving the second place man a run on the leader.
Because that's what this is about, isn't it - introducing an artificial closeness to the race... |
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 20:29 (Ref:1645216) | #12 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 146
|
I understand your point there...but F1 is supposed to be thinking of the fans, and working out how to 'make the show better'. It would certainly help to do that. But yes, its perhaps not fair on some drivers.
|
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 20:36 (Ref:1645230) | #13 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,957
|
Show? Or Sport?
Is the principle aim to entertain the fans (falsely?) or to find the fastest? If it entertains along the way then great, but let us do it naturally. If we force it then it isn't real sport or even the best entertainment. If we do it falsely then we can never have the ultimate highs and we are settling for a mediocre middle ground. To improve the sport (and show) we should concentrate on the cars and the racing. We should not help those who are behind, we should not penalise those who have done well to lead. Those who demonstrate the skill we crave to see. It is not meant to be easy to beat the best. Last edited by Adam43; 30 Jun 2006 at 20:44. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
30 Jun 2006, 20:38 (Ref:1645234) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Presumably maltafan also thinks that, when a soccer team has a player sent off, the score should be reset to 0-0, so as to make it 'fairer' for the 10 players they have left? Alonso had lapped 2 extra cars and deserved an advantage from that. NASCAR is welcome to rules designed to contrieve a show, but F1 should never lower itself to that.
|
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 20:40 (Ref:1645235) | #15 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
And that is spot on, Adam.
|
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 20:51 (Ref:1645241) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
It's a lot more interesting when the competitors get bunched up together for a restart. F1 has a chronic problem with providing excitement, moving lapped cars out of the way would improve it.
|
||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
30 Jun 2006, 20:54 (Ref:1645243) | #17 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Oh yes, immeasurably.
Perhaps they could bring out the pace car at five lap intervals as well, to provide a-thrill-a-second. |
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 22:40 (Ref:1645350) | #18 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
|
It's funny how these things are so-often knee-jerk.
A slow Jarno Trulli at a restart in Canada and suddenly people want the rules overhauled. |
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 22:48 (Ref:1645367) | #19 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Yes. I mean, it seems the race was much more open until the safety car came out and gave Jarno Trulli the chance to wreck everything.
In fact, seriously, we got a position change out of the safety car. Michael got past Kimi after all. |
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 22:50 (Ref:1645370) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
|
Absolutely - a safety car ultimately changed the order of the top three (and fooled some people into thinking Ferrari were on the pace )
|
||
|
30 Jun 2006, 22:55 (Ref:1645375) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,739
|
In regards to Champ Car I like the idea. But SC periods or full-course yellows are more prevelant in American racing and thus this type of situation is accounted for in the race strategy.
In regards to F1 I am against the idea. A SC period is pretty rare so for some driver it would be like winning the lottery. I have to say however at the time of the race I did wish they would move the backmarkers out of the way. However after my head cleared , I am glad they didn't. Alonso fully deserved the win and it would have cheapened the race IMO, and I am a Maclaren supporter. |
||
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !" |
1 Jul 2006, 09:18 (Ref:1645546) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
I can't believe some people are in favour of this idea. there are much better non-artificial ways to increase the excitement in races, changing the aerodynamics or using less Tilkerings for example. Alonso had 2 cars in between him because he'd lapped them and Kimi hadn't. Imagine a situation where a team-mate of the 2nd place driver intentionally crashes to trigger a safety car, so as to increase his team-mate's chance of snatching victory.
|
||
|
1 Jul 2006, 11:19 (Ref:1645585) | #23 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,359
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Dave Brand; 1 Jul 2006 at 11:26. |
||||
__________________
Doing an important job doesn't make you an important person. |
1 Jul 2006, 11:36 (Ref:1645596) | #24 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
"It is not meant to be easy to beat the best".
Yes,spot on Adam (even if it is a little bit hard to take). Last edited by Marbot; 1 Jul 2006 at 11:38. |
|
|
1 Jul 2006, 11:38 (Ref:1645597) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
How about introducing a 'double row' system like in NASCAR (Oh my God!), where cars on the lead lap stay right and the lapped cars stay left of the track?
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
yellow flag and lap times | cdn girl | Marshals Forum | 22 | 18 Nov 2004 14:34 |
Yellow Flag between sessions | Flagman | Marshals Forum | 104 | 13 Jun 2003 09:18 |
Yellow Flag Laps | GoFaster | ChampCar World Series | 8 | 1 Jun 2003 17:56 |
Overtaking under yellow | Peter Harding | Marshals Forum | 104 | 18 Mar 2003 22:20 |
Now I Know What The Black and Yellow 1/4 flag is for! | robert77 | Marshals Forum | 2 | 26 Aug 2002 19:04 |