|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Jul 2006, 15:00 (Ref:1648933) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 180
|
Official: Bridgestone for 2008-2010
|
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 15:11 (Ref:1648939) | #2 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
I would think that slicks would be on the cards for next year.
|
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 15:23 (Ref:1648948) | #3 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Also,Microsoft MES are to be official ECU supplier.http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns17087.html
|
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 15:44 (Ref:1648964) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 180
|
Last edited by KevinS; 5 Jul 2006 at 15:46. |
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 16:10 (Ref:1648979) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 180
|
|||
|
5 Jul 2006, 16:22 (Ref:1648986) | #6 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
To switch off your engine click on start. Let's hope Bill Gates doesn't get too involved.http://www.musclecarclub.com/humor/h...ve.shtml#gates Last edited by Marbot; 5 Jul 2006 at 16:28. |
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 17:03 (Ref:1649012) | #7 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
That's a good one !
OH, and 2007 Bridgestone will be sole supplier due to absence of "others" suppliers... |
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
5 Jul 2006, 17:08 (Ref:1649013) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Not sure why you have quoted a word that wasn't used, Bon, but, yes, it rather confirms no Michelin for 2007.
Btw, martyn, the original link of this thread tells us about the Microsoft MES supplying ECU's. Anyway, as to the subject at hand: no surprise at all. As has been said, all that waits to be seen is whether or not we'll see slicks come in for '07. Last edited by Dutton; 5 Jul 2006 at 17:11. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
5 Jul 2006, 17:15 (Ref:1649015) | #9 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
5 Jul 2006, 17:21 (Ref:1649020) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
I am not sure.
It would remove one level of *****ing and moaning about Ferrari getting golden rubber (note that none of the other Bridgestone runners would gain an advantage...). It could be introduced if there is adequate agreement, but, well, we all know how tricky that can be. I am not worried either way; however, some others wil be. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
5 Jul 2006, 17:45 (Ref:1649034) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Taken from the ITV-F1 site...
"In addition, the World Council agreed to consult with F1’s Technical Working Group to devise ways of reducing cornering speeds, which have risen sharply this year due to advances in aerodynamics and tyre technology..." Now for the sake of almighty, attack the aero and not the tyres this time!!! Knowing the FIA and the TWG we will get a 5th groove in the tyres, woopee, I wonder how long it will take them to come up with that plan... etc etc. |
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 18:43 (Ref:1649060) | #12 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
That's more likely than a complete change to slicks, now having only one supplier and being Bridgestone, they can argue that they won't have time or resources to change it for the next season.
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
5 Jul 2006, 19:23 (Ref:1649085) | #13 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
Can't really see why Bridgestone would continue with the grooves.It would obviously help Ferrari if they did and we'd just get loads of conspiracy theory threads. |
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 19:27 (Ref:1649088) | #14 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 20:14 (Ref:1649112) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,312
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Jul 2006, 20:47 (Ref:1649128) | #16 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,196
|
1972?
I am disappointed with all this, but it has all been said before so I won't go on about it. Let us hope that they don't go boring and safe. Make a tyre that needs looking after by the teams and drivers. As for the ECU. Again disappointing, but if it gets rid of TC (etc...) then maybe it is a necessary evil. Evil it is though. Standard parts? boo.... |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
5 Jul 2006, 21:21 (Ref:1649156) | #17 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
ECU I am in favour of as it has been said this will get rid of driver aids. And that would be magnificent.
Tyres. It's a silly idea really, as F1 is no doubt doomed to run on granite compounds now. |
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 21:26 (Ref:1649164) | #18 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 236
|
My first instinct on the tyre thing is that its a big edge for Ferrari at least at the start of the season.
Seems to me the competitive Michellin teams (Renault, McLaren, ???) will have a lot of work to do the get their cars to work with their new suppliers. Plus, Ferrari and Bridgestone are *cough* *cough* 'very close friends'. Not that I would imply that Ferrari would do anything to pressure Bridgestone to give them any kind of preferential treatment. I would never imply that. Never. |
|
__________________
Racing is life. Everything that happens before or after is just waiting. |
5 Jul 2006, 21:27 (Ref:1649166) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
I still think it would be cool if we had like 5 manufacturers, and the teams could take any compound of any brand at any point in the weekend.
I guess the one thing with getting rid of the tyre war is the removal of tyre testing. This will supposedly reduce the testing load...although, tbh, I would think they will just test other stuff instead. I am fortunate, I guess, in that I like both tyre wars and single suppliers (different pros and cons), so either way I am happy enough. Regarding Ferrari preferential treatment: If Bridgestone are providing every car of the field, then what does it matter to them who wins the race? What about the other Bridgestone teams, in the aftermath of the switch, do they not get an advantage over Michelin runners? Actually, nevermind, yes, absolutely, it is all a conspiracy to help Ferrari (oh, wait, no, the tyre war was...)... Last edited by Dutton; 5 Jul 2006 at 21:30. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
5 Jul 2006, 21:28 (Ref:1649167) | #20 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I think that is a forlorn fear.
The team that does the best job with the tyres will win. Bridgestone are guaranteed to win, so I assume they won't care which team does it for them. As for getting rid of tyre testing.....well, there will still be some tyre testing for various reasons. And when they aren't testing tyres, they will test aero parts. |
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 21:46 (Ref:1649189) | #21 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,196
|
The Ferrari/Bridgestone fear is unfounded. It is easy to make the connection, but ultimately has no credence.
There may well be an advantage at first because they work with them now, but I feel some of this may be logistical rather than knowledge of the tyre. The tyre is likely to be quite different. Beside as time moves on then any initial advantage will reduce as everyone gets used to it. Then there is the suggestion that Bridgestone will somehow favour them by giving them better tyres. This is false. The tyres will be allocated randomly and compounds checked. |
||
__________________
Brum brum |
5 Jul 2006, 21:49 (Ref:1649198) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Ah, Adam, you forget that it is the FIA randomly (rather, "randomly") allocating the tyres.
It is a rather big mover and shaker in the Grand Conspiracy. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
5 Jul 2006, 23:38 (Ref:1649265) | #23 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
I'm sure that the ECU's will still allow for remapping etc and will also allow the driver to play X-box games whilst waiting in the garage during qually.
Not be too long now before the tyres are just those "round black things". |
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 23:43 (Ref:1649267) | #24 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Don't get your hopes up...
|
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 23:49 (Ref:1649272) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
There could be an argument that maximising your tyres is going to be more important than ever: if you do it better than your opponents, then you have this advantage over EVERYONE.
There will be no differences between manufacturers (duh!), but also no inter-team compound variations (beyond the hard/soft option). Also, tyres is just one part of the puzzle. Those who are expecting it to make a massive difference to the racing on the track should not get overly excited. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coupes from 2010 | isynge | Sportscar & GT Racing | 427 | 20 Aug 2008 19:54 |
Champ Car extends contract with Edmonton until 2010 | drewdawg727 | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 20 Nov 2005 19:03 |
...Tassie...on the map ;-/ ...until 2010... | retro | Australasian Touring Cars. | 19 | 17 Nov 2005 03:10 |
V8SC in Darwin beyond 2010 | Kerri | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 29 Nov 2004 07:46 |
Australian GP to stay in Melbourne until 2010 | Andy H | Trackside | 4 | 18 Aug 2000 11:32 |